|
|
Social Security: Is It Really A 'Surplus' ?
04-08-2017, 01:33 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,554
|
Social Security: Is It Really A 'Surplus' ?
I'm going to do my absolute best to keep this non-political.
If you reply, please do the same.
Here's a scan from a pamphlet that was included with my quarterly 401(k) statement from Vanguard in 2006. Sorry about the quality.
I agree with what the woman says, that it really isn't a surplus.
Agree/disagree ?
FYI: I'm approximately 7 years away from being able to collect, & as it stands now, even if the absolute worst case scenario took place, & I was never allowed to collect a single penny, I'd probably be OK.
So it's not about me.
__________________
"No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity, but I know none, therefore am no beast"
Shown @ The End Of The Movie 'Runaway Train'
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-08-2017, 01:56 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,246
|
Why does it matter?
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 02:24 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
|
Quote:
I'm going to do my absolute best to keep this non-political.
|
Rest of the post is a political rant. For some years more SS tax was collected than was paid in benefits. That's a fact and not particularly political. Arguing about whether a 9 year old brochure should call it a surplus, or that anyone who doesn't agree with you is ignorant, is blatantly political.
Is your purpose only to stir up controversy?
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 02:52 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by growing_older
Rest of the post is a political rant. For some years more SS tax was collected than was paid in benefits. That's a fact and not particularly political. Arguing about whether a 9 year old brochure should call it a surplus, or that anyone who doesn't agree with you is ignorant, is blatantly political.
Is your purpose only to stir up controversy?
|
I edited the post.
I was not trying to stir up controversy.
Is it OK with you now ?
__________________
"No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity, but I know none, therefore am no beast"
Shown @ The End Of The Movie 'Runaway Train'
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 03:17 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Limerick
Posts: 5,638
|
Well, the only political problem is both sides are irresponsible and we continue to vote out anyone who whispers about changing anything. So I just plan on taking at least a 70% haircut at some not too distant future date and am glad we've saved more than we need. No controversy, just fact.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 10:28 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dash man
Well, the only political problem is both sides are irresponsible and we continue to vote out anyone who whispers about changing anything. So I just plan on taking at least a 70% haircut at some not too distant future date and am glad we've saved more than we need. No controversy, just fact.
|
Thanks Dash man. That's the type of reply I was hoping to see.
No ranting, no raving, no politicizing, just a straight up & sensible response.
__________________
"No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity, but I know none, therefore am no beast"
Shown @ The End Of The Movie 'Runaway Train'
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 02:29 AM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,789
|
Back in the early 80's, I was learning to sell investment products for a well known financial services/insurance company. Most retirement planning literature I read on the subject at that time promoted the 3 stool (pension, savings, SS) theory of retirement planning. Most also predicted the demise of SS in 20 years or so....
Well, here we are, 35 years later. Very few pensions left, but SS is still chugging along. Call me skeptical, but I'll worry about SS cuts when I see them.
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 06:29 AM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dash man
Well, the only political problem is both sides are irresponsible and we continue to vote out anyone who whispers about changing anything. So I just plan on taking at least a 70% haircut at some not too distant future date and am glad we've saved more than we need. No controversy, just fact.
|
I think you have it reversed. Isn't it a 30% haircut leaving you 70% of current benefits if no change is made?
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 06:37 AM
|
#9
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,508
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
I think you have it reversed. Isn't it a 30% haircut leaving you 70% of current benefits if no change is made?
|
As a result of changes to Social Security enacted in 1983, benefits are now expected to be payable in full on a timely basis until 2037, when the trust fund reserves are projected to become exhausted.1 At the point where the reserves are used up, continuing taxes are expected to be enough to pay 76 percent of scheduled benefits.
see: https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/...v70n3p111.html
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 07:14 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
|
24% haircut. If we can invade Iraq while cutting taxes we can make up that trifling difference for the good of all.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 07:26 AM
|
#11
|
Gone but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Peru
Posts: 6,335
|
Know the details are involved. We left the workforce to make room for others to take our place. Social Security was part of our plan.
Hope to keep SS for another 6 years. After age 86, thinking we'll be ok.
__________________
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion.
--Dalai Lama XIV
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 07:38 AM
|
#12
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,375
|
If Congress would just raise benefits we could take a bigger haircut in the future.
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 08:12 AM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Limerick
Posts: 5,638
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
I think you have it reversed. Isn't it a 30% haircut leaving you 70% of current benefits if no change is made?
|
What you are saying is the common belief. I believe further cuts will be in store for those with other means of support...asset testing. I was wondering if anyone would catch that.
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 08:24 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,326
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeea
As a result of changes to Social Security enacted in 1983, benefits are now expected to be payable in full on a timely basis until 2037, when the trust fund reserves are projected to become exhausted.1 At the point where the reserves are used up, continuing taxes are expected to be enough to pay 76 percent of scheduled benefits.
|
I'm betting that if it comes to a "haircut" (whether direct or via back-door methods such as additional taxation of benefits) the effect won't be the same for everyone and those with low SS benefits and little or no other income sources will see less impact. As usual, high earners and those who saved a lot for retirement will bear most of the impact.
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 08:24 AM
|
#15
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,173
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
I think you have it reversed. Isn't it a 30% haircut leaving you 70% of current benefits if no change is made?
|
I ran Firecalc assuming a 70% of SS benefits. For some odd reason I survive the cut without giving up any necessities or even some extras.
Of course, I never assumed SS would be all that was needed to retire well. A radical thought, I know.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 08:28 AM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,995
|
I would have no problem if we raised the cap on SS payments to allow the plan to continue on past 2037 without a shortfall. But I would be very disappointed if my benefit was cut or means tested. I've been paying into the system since I was 14 years old. Cutting the benefit now would make me feel like I was scammed by the government. I hope we figure out a solution.
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 08:34 AM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dash man
What you are saying is the common belief. I believe further cuts will be in store for those with other means of support...asset testing. I was wondering if anyone would catch that.
|
common belief? Check out joea's link to the info from the SS actuaries. More like a 24% haircut. Even with some means testing there would be no need to go over 30% for anyone. SS is not in the dumpster.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 08:41 AM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ormond Beach
Posts: 1,407
|
How are obviously political threads like these ok (speculating about the future of SS), but threads talking about the future of the ACA are not?
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 09:00 AM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTFan
How are obviously political threads like these ok (speculating about the future of SS), but threads talking about the future of the ACA are not?
|
i see significant differences. This thread has focused on how deep the SS shortfall is. So far nobody has tossed aspersions on what one party or another proposes to do about it. Once that emerges Porky won't be far behind. The moderators understand that ACA discussions head that way quickly so they keep Porky in ready reserve for those threads.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
04-09-2017, 09:49 AM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,686
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerntz
If Congress would just raise benefits we could take a bigger haircut in the future.
|
In the future many of us won't need a haircut.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|