Speaking of Student Debt

My university definitely communicated major specific starting salaries to undergraduates. I used this information to help guide my major choice.

Neat. Any idea on how they got the information? Care to share the university name? Did you consider more than one school and find this was common? (It's been a decade since my youngest was a freshman, so maybe things have changed since then.)
 
Student lending regulations need to be updated. Universities need to keep at least 1/2 of the total loan on their books, so if a graduate doesn't pay back the loan they are the losers. How long would it take for this excess student debt problem to become "less excessive"?

College: so son, what do you want to study?

Applicant: I dunno. Liberal arts, I guess.

College: Our tuition is $25K and the total 4 year cost is over $200K. How much you got?

Applicant: Uh, I'm looking to borrow

College: Next!
 
+1. Parents should share some of the blame too for letting their kids follow their "passion".
I think a big part of the problem is that kids are lied to in their youth. They're told they can "be anything they want to be," and they must "follow their dreams," no matter what. So you get kids following that advice, and spending $12,000/year studying art history (their "passion"), only to find that nobody is impressed.
 
Student lending regulations need to be updated. Universities need to keep at least 1/2 of the total loan on their books, so if a graduate doesn't pay back the loan they are the losers. How long would it take for this excess student debt problem to become "less excessive"?

College: so son, what do you want to study?

Applicant: I dunno. Liberal arts, I guess.

College: Our tuition is $25K and the total 4 year cost is over $200K. How much you got?

Applicant: Uh, I'm looking to borrow

College: Next!

Looks good to me. Simple and effective.
 
Since you mentioned Chem E I wonder if you are in the hydrocarbon biz of some sort. Salaries in that field are mind blowing (from my perspective) and the salaries of the professors at my alma mater are maybe a good indicator of market value - the ChemE's get roughly 2x the salary of the civil E professors.

I am in the chemical/gas side of chip making, used to be in telecom. Thanks for taking the time to update me. I must admit I am quite saddened to see eng jobs being paid this way, but with all the outsourcing and manufacturing that has moved offshore and the weak economy, I guess it should not be a surprise. Although I am a EE, early in my career I moved to the business side of things. I still wonder about what would have happened had I stayed on a technical track.
 
Unfortunately the US of A. Must be a regional thing (southeast). I'm talking mostly folks with a civil engineering background, although there are other types (industrial, computer/electrical, etc). Not saying $55,000 is a great salary for these folks, just some are stuck with what they have, pay cuts, stagnant wages, etc. Some work for the government.

I know this seems like a strange concept for some on the board who work in high tech high demand fields and have done really well, but there really are a lot of people out there making less than $75,000 a year even ten years out of engineering school. And of those that I know, that is the rule, not the exception.

This study summarizes data from the American Community Survey, which surveys hundreds of thousands of people. The authors only selected people who were working full-time, year-round. http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/whatsitworth-complete.pdf

I pulled data from page 114 for a couple popular engineering categories:

Electrical Engineering 60,000 85,000 110,00
Civil Engineering ____ 57,000 78,000 103,000

The numbers are 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile earnings. So this says about 25 percent of the engineers in these categories are earning less than $60,000.

I don't think the survey narrowed this to people whose jobs are a straight line connection to the degree. Some of the low salaries could be people who dropped out of engineering, some of the high salaries could be people who have moved into general management etc.
 
Do colleges actually have this information? I've earned 3 degrees from different institutions and I never reported to them where I went to work or what I made.

i don't mind sharing mine, as i was looking at it just last week. If you google career center + institution name, the career center home page popped up and even had this bit of information.

Supply parents with the information and materials to encourage their sons' and daughters' exploration of career possibilities and the development of lifelong career success skills, from the first day on campus, through graduation, and into the early days of an exciting career.

nonetheless, here is the salary information from my college (and i actually view it every year or so).

http://careers.mines.edu/Files/2009-10 Salary (updated).pdf

I do think these kids in the article absorbed a gross amount of debt based on a thought of entitlement. getting any old college degree isn't like rounding second in the game of becoming a CEO. the unfortunate thing is, most students have a gross misunderstanding of the real world, what people actually make opposed to how they act/say they make and their real value in society.

also, these statistics can be very deceiving. law school is a perfect example. they'll report they have an average starting salary of $80k. so, what does that say? most people think, if i do ok and am just average and get through law school, i'll be making $80k. wrong, no one actually starts making $80k. There are people who are way over and even more people who are way under that average. seeing the actual distribution helps.
 
ronocnikral said:
If you google career center + institution name, the career center home page popped up and even had this bit of information.

I never thought of doing that, but tried it.

Here's the information from Texas A&M University, where I got my BSEE:

Survey Results for Texas A&M University Post Graduation Plans <br />Fall 2010 (Generated 02/11/2011)

It doesn't have complete salary information for all grads, or even most of them, though.

I recall just before graduation, as we were all standing there in caps and gowns, the head of the electrical engineering department came by with a clipboard and asked each of us in my graduating EE class what job and salary we had accepted. I guess the department kept its own statistics as well, or maybe supplemented those collected by the career center.
 
Last edited:
When I was in college in the early 1980s, I recall hearing a joke (maybe from Jackie Mason) about choosing a major and its job prospects upon graduation:

"Philosophy majors.......they can't get jobs.......but at least they know why!"
 
+1. Parents should share some of the blame too for letting their kids follow their "passion".

I'm all for loving what you do for a living. However, how is an 18-year old college student supposed to know what s/he loves to do before doing it? There are majors that will give a college student a solid education that can be applied to dozens of fields. Good examples are business administration, accounting, finance, mathematics, biology, physics, etc... These are all generally rigorous majors that provide a fundamental understanding of the basics of a particular field, but which don't lock someone into a particular career right out of school. Conspicuously absent are majors like history, art, philosophy, gender studies, English, etc... While intellectually stimulating, they simply aren't practical in today's competitive marketplace. If someone wants to "minor" in them, I'm all for it.
 
I never thought of doing that, but tried it.

Here's the information from Texas A&M University, where I got my BSEE:

Survey Results for Texas A&M University Post Graduation Plans <br />Fall 2010 (Generated 02/11/2011)

It doesn't have complete salary information for all grads, or even most of them, though.

I recall just before graduation, as we were all standing there in caps and gowns, the head of the electrical engineering department came by with a clipboard and asked each of us in my graduating EE class what job and salary we had accepted. I guess the department kept its own statistics as well, or maybe supplemented those collected by the career center.

Your data is from the fall of 2010 which wasn't too good a time to be graduating with an engineering degree. Texas A&M is definitely one of the better engineering schools and is a bargain compared to many other schools. I have never heard of any company paying a premium for people from any specific university. Some schools get slightly higher offers than others (like MIT) but that difference disappears within 3 years of graduation.

I'm more familiar with chemical engineering salaries. I have heard that the current graduates are getting $80 - 85K right out of school. As an old fart I am being paid considerably more.

As for all this student debt discussion, the debt is taken on for "lifestyle." Students and parents want their children to go to the prestige university. They want to live comfortably and enjoy spring break. They never think about what happens when that debt must be paid back.

I worked my way through college with help from grants, loans and scholarships. I never spent my loan money which I was forced to take with my grants. It was sitting in the bank when I graduated. I paid my student loans off within the first year after graduation. I didn't do it right away because it was my "emergency fund." I believe that a committed student can work, keep their grades up and make enough to pay for a reasonable state school education.

People graduating with burdensome debt are victims of self-inflicted wounds.
 
People graduating with burdensome debt are victims of self-inflicted wounds.

+1

I never borrowed any money for college, either in a student loan or from my parents. I worked several jobs while going through, instead, and paid my own room, board, books, and tuition for both undergrad degrees. I chose the schools I attended because they were cheap and nearby. I had assistantships in grad school so tuition was waived and I earned enough to live on.

Tuition today is higher and books cost more, but I still see little reason for a college student to borrow too much more than the cost of tuition and books. It seems like those who that borrow several hundred thousand more than that, just because they can, may be shooting themselves in the foot.

At the time I attended Texas A&M, the chemical engineering department was new and extremely small. As far as I know it may still be small and the salaries listed may not be typical.
 
Last edited:
The concept of having to take out loans for college is a choice that does not need to happen with planning.

Never saved a dime for my kids college -- But also never planned to make kids borrow for college or borrow ourselves for their college....

We always adjusted our lifestyles and made choices so that we could live on ONE income.
Smaller house, not as nice of cars, etc etc.
One spouse ( DW ) was in and out of the workforce as the kids allowed her to be based on their needs...... The idea was that when old enough to attend college that the 2nd income would pay for the college costs on a "as you go" basis.

We did one better -- When oldest was approaching HS senior year we found a high dollar private college locally that charges about $800+ per credit hour and DW applied to work there , taking ANY job (since moving up a couple times) ----- Big Benefit to employees is 100% tuition remission so kids both get to attend nice college tuition free and oldest is now in her senior year at college and has ZERO debt and is now working as an intern at a bank as an auditot to boot! Second child just began College Freshman year summer courses and is right on same track.

Wife's income is used for college books, vacations and additional savings.
 
Neat. Any idea on how they got the information? Care to share the university name? Did you consider more than one school and find this was common? (It's been a decade since my youngest was a freshman, so maybe things have changed since then.)

The data came from student surveys run at graduation. Being self reported, it is probably prone to some sort of bias. For me, it was the relative numbers that mattered. Here's a copy of the results from 2005:

http://www.northwestern.edu/careers...__Employers_and_Job_Titles_by_School_MEAS.pdf

It seems they moved to posting it on facebook...
 
At the time I attended Texas A&M, the chemical engineering department was new and extremely small. As far as I know it may still be small and the salaries listed may not be typical.


It's not small now. I think it's one of the largest programs in the country and very well rated. To qualify for admittance the first two year's GPA in their general engineering program has to be very good. UTx also has a large, well rated program.

Right now the big money is in petroleum engineering. ChemE grads get pulled into that too.
 
Three points:
  1. Local junior college then state university.
  2. Get a degree in a field in which there are available jobs.
  3. Not everyone needs a college degree.
There are some fine technical training opportunities in just about every state. Even the local high school offers welding, certified nurses assistant training as well as pharmacy tech training. These young people have jobs waiting for them when they pass the certification requirements.
 
i don't mind sharing mine, as i was looking at it just last week. If you google career center + institution name, the career center home page popped up and even had this bit of information.



nonetheless, here is the salary information from my college (and i actually view it every year or so).

http://careers.mines.edu/Files/2009-10 Salary (updated).pdf

I do think these kids in the article absorbed a gross amount of debt based on a thought of entitlement. getting any old college degree isn't like rounding second in the game of becoming a CEO. the unfortunate thing is, most students have a gross misunderstanding of the real world, what people actually make opposed to how they act/say they make and their real value in society.

also, these statistics can be very deceiving. law school is a perfect example. they'll report they have an average starting salary of $80k. so, what does that say? most people think, if i do ok and am just average and get through law school, i'll be making $80k. wrong, no one actually starts making $80k. There are people who are way over and even more people who are way under that average. seeing the actual distribution helps.

That's excellent information. I'm not surprised that an engineering school would be happy to provide it.

I'm thinking all schools should do that with all their majors. I'm pretty confident that engineering grads often get good offers, the real issue is "What do English Lit grads do after graduation?" and "What's the gap between English Lit grads from Harvard and those from MyStateU?" I'm thinking that's where the dollars get wasted.

A couple details. It seems that "outcomes" should be "employed". I'd rather see actual salaries for accepted positions (probably 25th and 75th percentiles) than the average offer. I'm thinking the better students get more and higher offers.
 
I'm more familiar with chemical engineering salaries. I have heard that the current graduates are getting $80 - 85K right out of school. As an old fart I am being paid considerably more.

If the Census data is correct, the median for all working CE's is $86k, so $80k-85k seems possible for the best new grads, but not for the average. OTOH, I've heard that in engineering the experience slope isn't as steep as in some fields.
 
If the Census data is correct, the median for all working CE's is $86k, so $80k-85k seems possible for the best new grads, but not for the average. OTOH, I've heard that in engineering the experience slope isn't as steep as in some fields.

Are you sure the data is for chemical and not civil engineers? My whole department would get up and walk out if we were informed we were going to get an average pay of $86K. ChemE salaries are lower in drug, power and food companies but they don't really hire that many. Most are in the O&G or chemical fields.

As for increases with experience, it really depends on whether you consider management positions that effectively require or strongly prefer a chemical engineering background. True techno-weenies might top out a 150 to 200% of starting salaries but management can go a good bit higher.
 
Are you sure the data is for chemical and not civil engineers? My whole department would get up and walk out if we were informed we were going to get an average pay of $86K. ChemE salaries are lower in drug, power and food companies but they don't really hire that many. Most are in the O&G or chemical fields.

As for increases with experience, it really depends on whether you consider management positions that effectively require or strongly prefer a chemical engineering background. True techno-weenies might top out a 150 to 200% of starting salaries but management can go a good bit higher.

They had Civil Engineers at $78k median.

I have no feeling for how much engineering salaries vary by location - that was the original issue.

All surveys have accuracy issues. My source is this: Center on Education and the Workforce -

Note there's a two page methodological appendix link way at the bottom of the page.
 
It's not small now. I think it's one of the largest programs in the country and very well rated. To qualify for admittance the first two year's GPA in their general engineering program has to be very good. UTx also has a large, well rated program.

Right now the big money is in petroleum engineering. ChemE grads get pulled into that too.

ChemE's currently won't get hired for petroleum engineer jobs and this has been true for the last 3 years. At least for my major oil company and I know of a few others that won't hire any other type of engineer for petro eng jobs. When they were getting hired in the "boom" time, they were intially paid 5 to 10% less than a pet eng. This is just based on being a pet eng. recruiter for a major oil company. ymmv.

As for increases with experience, it really depends on whether you consider management positions that effectively require or strongly prefer a chemical engineering background. True techno-weenies might top out a 150 to 200% of starting salaries but management can go a good bit higher.

I disagree with this as well. for one, after 6 years, I am at 172% of my starting salary. I may have hit the peak, but I have recently put the feelers out for what I could get if I switch to another company, and just switching would put me well over 200%. I also know many "techno-weenies" who make more than their supervisor.

That's excellent information. I'm not surprised that an engineering school would be happy to provide it.

I'm thinking all schools should do that with all their majors. I'm pretty confident that engineering grads often get good offers, the real issue is "What do English Lit grads do after graduation?" and "What's the gap between English Lit grads from Harvard and those from MyStateU?" I'm thinking that's where the dollars get wasted.

I agree all students should see these numbers. but, does it really influence a young adult? for instance, if they are majoring in music, they most likely see some successful musician as their path opposed to a music teacher making $40k. It is most likely tough to "crush" a young adult's "dreams," but i suspect very few are passionate enough about their "dreams" to be scraping by day to day.
 
Back
Top Bottom