Join Early Retirement Today
View Poll Results: What percentage of your expenses will SS cover
0-25% 55 42.64%
25-50% 49 37.98%
50-75% 13 10.08%
75-100% 12 9.30%
over 100% 0 0%
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
SS as a %age of your income
Old 11-23-2009, 09:29 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,844
SS as a %age of your income

Over the last 20 years it's been fashionable to down play the role of SS in retirement planning, and given the government's deficit we may have to wait a little longer before we collect. However, SS isn't going to go away so I'd be interested what %age of income you see it replacing.

I'm single, have a good job and live fairly modestly so once the house is paid off SS will cover 60% of my living expenses.
__________________

nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 11-23-2009, 09:34 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
calmloki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Independence
Posts: 5,603
Something under 6%. Perils of rental property generating what the gubermint calls "unearned income". S'OK. I trust me more than them anyway.
__________________

calmloki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:40 AM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 40,159
It looks like SS will comprise about 24% of my total income in retirement if I claim it at age 66, 18% if I claim it at age 62. Haven't completely decided yet although I am tentatively planning on age 66.

Edited to add: I live a fairly simple lifestyle too, but I am planning to "ramp it up" to more nearly match my retirement income level. That will be easier to do after we have moved, probably in about a year or a little more. Right now, every time I see something I want, I think, "Do I really want to lug that to Missouri?"
__________________
5/17/2018: Retired a second time, this time from my volunteer Admin duties. After 10 years of being on the team, and 40,000+ posts, the time just seemed right. It has been such fun to work with all of our Mods and Admins and I plan to stick around as a regular member.
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:59 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Gotadimple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,841
Would that be before or after taxes?

Before taxes, about 24% after taxes about 12%. At some point I will need to take RMD and when that happens the percentage of expenses that SS provides will shrink.
__________________
Only got A dimple, would have preferred 2!
Gotadimple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:03 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indialantic FL
Posts: 1,212
I'll be happy if it covers medicare costs. Anything more than that will be a bonus.

Jim
__________________
JimnJana
"The four most dangerous words in investing are 'This time it's different.'" - Sir John Templeton
jimnjana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 12:00 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Rustic23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Livingston, Tx
Posts: 3,654
While SS is about 25% of my before tax income, yet SS alone will cover about 60% of our current expenses.
__________________
If it is after 5:00 when I post I reserve the right to disavow anything I posted.
Rustic23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 06:33 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
TromboneAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,407
At 66 I'd get 1,826/month and DW, 1,398/month. Quicken says our expenses for the last month totalled $30,142. So SS would cover 128% of expenses.

I voted "75-100%" so as not to jinx anything.

NOTE: Title says "As a percentage of your income," but poll says "As a percentage of your expenses."
__________________
Al
TromboneAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 06:50 PM   #8
Moderator
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,624
With current assumptions according to the PEBES we receive, around 50%. Like most people not very close to the age of collecting it, I don't expect to see the benefit levels being touted for me today.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)

RIP to Reemy, my avatar dog (2003 - 9/16/2017)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 06:59 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by TromboneAl View Post
At 66 I'd get 1,826/month and DW, 1,398/month. Quicken says our expenses for the last month totalled $30,142. So SS would cover 128% of expenses.

I voted "75-100%" so as not to jinx anything.

NOTE: Title says "As a percentage of your income," but poll says "As a percentage of your expenses."
Yeah you right - maybe ballpark 25% the last couple years - BUT since I have a lot of latitude in retirement - the cheap SOB in me says I could run it toward 100% (17k at 62 took it in 2005). FireCalc and the ORP says at 10k final estate I could maybe go 19% by spending more - not taking it with me and croaking precisely at 84.6 + or - a tad.

heh heh heh - Katrina altered my bullet proof I'm gonna live forever attitude hence 62 versus stretching to 66 or even 70.
unclemick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 07:18 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
calmloki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Independence
Posts: 5,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by TromboneAl View Post
.... Quicken says our expenses for the last month totalled $30,142...."
Is that even with cutting paper towels in half? Heard California was an expensive place to live, but....
calmloki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 07:42 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
73ss454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaLa Land
Posts: 4,378
Hey Al, I think you gotta drop the Zero.
73ss454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 08:32 PM   #12
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 531
For those of us who are many years away from SS, what percentage of our current projected benefits are we likely to actually receive? That's what makes answering this question the most difficult for me.

I just received my annual statement of projected SS benefits. If I actually receive the number they are showing (in inflation-adjusted dollars) at age 67, I'd be doing great. It's just that I don't believe it.
ksr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:45 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,956
I'm 62. If we wait till 66 to collect, SS will cover 75-100% of our "basic" annual expenses. The big unknown is medical costs.

I'd like to be able to spend 2x our basic expenses, but that's a "like to do" thing that depends a lot on what happens between now and then.
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:00 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
kyounge1956's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,171
I voted for 0-25%. I should be able to cover basic expenses between my pension and my portfolio. That leaves SS for a cushion, to cover the fact that I have probably underestimated how much health insurance costs will go up, that I have probably forgotten something in my plans, and that a huge rise in taxes or inflation or the pension fund going bust or other unforeseen occurrences may throw a monkey wrench in my plans. And I don't think I really believe I'm going to get the full amount on my projection. Something will have to change, the eligibility age will be increased again, or there will be means testing, or more of it will be subject to income tax, or something to keep (make?) SS solvent.
kyounge1956 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 11:35 PM   #15
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 988
Gee, I hate to be the negative guy on this thread, but I am assuming in the next ten years or so Congress will get around to means testing SS recipients. My best guess is that SS will be phased out for anyone with over $100,000 income. Perhaps offset will be you can withdraw from IRSs/401ks tax-free to make up for "stealing" earlier contributions.
LARS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 04:21 AM   #16
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 689
According to our statements, together, we are each "supposedly" getting a decent set of SS payments and will draw in our own names with amounts that are substantially equal (vary only by $4/month)-- so it would cover 68% of expenses. However, we have reduced to 75% the projected statement amounts into our budgets. So then that would be 48% of pretax spending. 9-10 years before we can tap at 62 if that age does not change.
bizlady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 06:39 AM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Rustic23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Livingston, Tx
Posts: 3,654
Lars,
If you are talking 'per individual' then $100,000 may be a good guess. It also may be a good guess if we are talking inflation dollars. However, as the current median household income is between $50,000 and $60,000 dollars with a single earner making around $45,000, I doubt that congress will set the limit as low as $100,000. But who knows, who ever thought you would see Democrats propose a $500,000,000,000 cut to medicare. Of course they have not actually passed that part of the bill either.
__________________
If it is after 5:00 when I post I reserve the right to disavow anything I posted.
Rustic23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 07:02 AM   #18
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eee Bah Gum
Posts: 22,041
I plan on drawing SS in about 10 years and it will be about 25% of retirement expenses.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Now it's adventure before dementia
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 07:50 AM   #19
Moderator
Walt34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 17,402
As with Alan, I think it'll be about 25%. The original plan was to begin SS at 62, but I will delay that if I'm still working at that time. It also depends on whether DW gets a job that she likes.

So we'll just wait and see how things work out.
__________________
I heard the call to do nothing. So I answered it.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 07:55 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Bikerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,901
Single at 62 SS provides 33% of (normal) yearly expenses. Its the third leg of the stool. Pension, SS & portfolio = 100%. That was the plan and it worked.
__________________

__________________
“I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said” Alan Greenspan
Bikerdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is an ideal debt to income ratio? And savings to income? TennisFan Young Dreamers 20 11-18-2008 04:54 PM
When you buy a car, what age or age range do you usually buy? cloudeleven Other topics 21 05-27-2008 08:20 AM
Does passive income = Retirement Income? Bree Young Dreamers 14 05-07-2008 08:53 AM
Equity/Fixed Income Allocation Change with Age Hydroman FIRE and Money 32 08-30-2006 10:05 PM
Income Stream, or Income Lump cfcf FIRE and Money 6 07-03-2006 12:37 PM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.