|
|
12-23-2014, 06:38 PM
|
#21
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,088
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idnar7
I exercised options after I retired each year when they were about to expire.
|
My experience is different.
I was laid off from one company and given 3 months of severance. When that ended, I could begin applying for unemployment, and I had 30 days to exercise all my outstanding options.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
12-23-2014, 07:19 PM
|
#22
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
...
You need to read the agreement carefully to see if you are subject to any restrictions or conditions regarding hedging and selling. ...
|
MichaelB makes a good point here that I overlooked. Gotta play by the rules!
-ERD50
|
|
|
12-24-2014, 08:27 PM
|
#23
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,558
|
Just suck it up and pay the taxes. I've seen a lot of people lose life changing money because they put too many eggs in one basket. No company is immune from the possibility of bankruptcy, however small. Imagine waking up unemployed with 20% of your assets gone.
If you could accept that, you don't need to sell.
Otherwise, sell down to your comfort level and don't give the taxes a second thought.
|
|
|
12-24-2014, 08:58 PM
|
#24
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,418
|
I exercised the bulk of them a month before they expired. Paid a lot of taxes but hell, if I could have held them a few more years, they would have been worth more.
But the timing worked out great for me, it was in the summer of 2008 and I immediately put most of them in high yielding CDs, some as much as 5% over 2 years.
When the financial crisis hit, I didn't have too much equities exposure but I was concerned about having a lot of cash beyond the FDIC limits. Helped that they raised it from $100k to $250k so I split the sums across several accounts.
Then I started moving them to VG as the CDs matured and interest rates plunged.
Timing was propitious.
Paying taxes wasn't fun, some high 5-figure tax bills. But the way I looked at it, it was an unexpected windfall (when I got the option grants, I didn't have high expectations of them).
Maybe I could have hired a tax advisor and optimized the tax efficiency but maybe the advisor would have had me sell earlier at lower prices.
It worked out well in the end.
|
|
|
12-25-2014, 11:38 PM
|
#25
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fh2000
We have some that are due next March. I set up some customized collars in a different brokerage account so I feel no violation of the rule not to short your own company stock.[...]
|
I'd be really careful about this - the restriction against shorting your stock usually has nothing to do with which account you do it in. At least for the times I've been under similar restrictions, the account wouldn't have made a difference. This is similar to the rules that would apply to insider trading - you can't get your spouse to do the hedge for you either.
As far as the OP is concerned, I didn't see in the description whether these are non-quals or Incentive Stock Options (ISOs).
If they're ISOs, you should consider the qualifying disposition rules:
Qualifying Disposition Definition | Investopedia
This will let you treat the gain as capital gains instead of regular income, albeit while incurring the risk of holding the stock for a year after exercise. (Note also that there's a potential AMT impact in the year you exercise - it's a good idea to sell enough shares immediately to cover the AMT bill). I'd recommend doing some reading on the details of this before pulling the trigger.
Since ISOs aren't that common these days, you may have non-quals which makes things simpler, since it removes the qualifying disposition option.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 06:27 AM
|
#26
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ulrichw
I'd be really careful about this - the restriction against shorting your stock usually has nothing to do with which account you do it in. At least for the times I've been under similar restrictions, the account wouldn't have made a difference. This is similar to the rules that would apply to insider trading - you can't get your spouse to do the hedge for you either......
|
+1 the prohibition is on you shorting your own stock, not shorting it in the same account as your options.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 10:39 AM
|
#27
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,568
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toocold
I've been fortunate to work at a stable megacorp where the stock price has had a nice run up, and I'm sitting on a decent chunk of change of in-the-money fully vested stock options.
My worry is that they now represent almost 20% of investable assets, and it will go up to 25% once the next traunch becomes vested early next year. This is uncomfortably high for me.
Add to this is that if I exercise my options, it will be taxed at the highest marginal tax rates, and I feel I already pay enough taxes to Uncle Sam.
Has anybody else been in this situation? Any advice on how to manage this?
|
If you are trying to get rich, roll the dice, no limit on what % to have in a single security.
If you are trying to protect wealth, no more than 10%, even less if your earnings are also tied to this asset.
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
__________________
You know that suit they burying you in? Thar ain’t no pockets in that suit, boy.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 02:18 PM
|
#28
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,830
|
My advice would be to you to ignore the tax consequences and deal with risk. Risk of the stock price falling or risk to your ability to cash out and retire.
I was in the same boat. I was concerned about loosing it all so I developed a sell strategy to sell my options over time. I did, at prices between 42 and 54. The stock subsequently went down to 12. By that time I had retired early, was FIRED thanks in part to the options, and was only left holding the bag on a few remaining underwater options. It is back up to 40 now but then again, I have been FIRED for over three years.
I know some colleagues who were also worried about tax. They no longer worry because their options went under water and expired-so they were e not fortunate enough to have realized a gain
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|