![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 11
|
Substantial Windfalls
Hello Retire Early people,
I will be receiving a substantial windfall over the next year. This will bring my assets to such a level that a 4% withdrawal rate will more than cover our family expenses. I am worried about making the proper strategic and tactical asset allocation. Would invite input on specific investment strategies, funds and other ideas. Some areas of concern include: 1. The eroding value of the dollar 2. The emergence of China and India etc. as economic powers 3. The impact of natural or man-made disasters 4. The possibility of a severe US recession 5. The rapidly rising costs of college (2 kids) and health care The combined wisdom on this board is tremendous. Hope some of you can help. Thanks in advance. Mountain Man |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 584
|
Re: Substantial Windfalls
I'll start working on a few thoughts...but in the mean time: have you verified that any windfall you'll be receiving has either had ALL gift/estate/income/personal property/whatever-else taxes paid, so you can focus on how to invest the net and not the gross?
One of my suggestions would be to consider a fixed income stable with some preferred stocks (check out the current thread on this topic in this forum).
__________________
Dryer sheets Schmyer sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,392
|
Re: Substantial Windfalls
My first question would have been have you already been saving and already have a long term plan, but I see your post in July says you had substantial assets saved already, mostly in after-tax investments distributed about 30% stock, 40% bond and 30% cash. I'm not sure the 4% rule works with that mix, but I haven't run it through FIREcalc to check. Also you said you were in your mid-30's, so your planned withdrawal period will be closer to 60 years than the 30-year period most often used in historical comparisons.
You were also then considering a couple of move-and-buy-or-build options. Plus you said you have two young kids. I don't have much to offer tonight except to bring out these details. Congratulations and/or condolences for your windfall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 11
|
Re: Substantial Windfalls
No tax issues that I can foresee. Part of the windfall is long term capital gain from the sale of a company where I was a minority owner. Part is an inheritance below the estate tax threshold as far as I know.
We recently sold the big city condo and bought a nice home in a quiet suburb for the same money. It's tough adjusting to life outside the city. Still dreaming of the mountain home. Plan is to invest the total pot in a well diversified portfolio and build the dream mountain home when we can do it without jeopardizing financial independence. Financial independence is our top priority after good health. Since I tend to worry, I will continue to work until I have the cash to build the dream house and feel my family is very well protected. So back to the immediate issue - What to do with the substantial windfall? Thanks Peter76 and BigMoneyJim for your early thoughts. Off on a business trip for several days - look forward to reading any more responses late next week. Mountain Man |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,226
|
Re: Substantial Windfalls
Quote:
Personally, what I would do is this: 20% bonds - 3/4 short/intermediate domestic, 1/4 unhedged foreign bonds 20% international equity - 3/4 EAFE, 1/4 developing 5% commodities 5% REIT/real estate 5% timber 20% S&P 500/large cap domestic equity 10% mid cap domestic equity 15% small cap domestic equity Rebalance annually.
__________________
“When you realize that you are one of the rare few who observe moral principles in their relationships with others, there is a temptation to sink into amorality, not out of conviction or pleasure but simply to avoid further pain, because there is no greater suffering than being an angel in hell, whereas a devil feels at home wherever he goes.” – Martin Page, How I Became Stupid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Recycles dryer sheets
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 368
|
Re: Substantial Windfalls
You have to understand what is meant by risk, and pick your own mix. One thing I recently tried to get a second opinion was to take the risk assesment survey at http://www.ifa.com/. You have to register, but I did not get excessive followup calls or email.
For me, it came back within 5 points of where I thought I should be. The risk assessment leads to a model portfolio that they recommend (DFA based). I just replace the fund names with category names and take that as one more input in my planning. Don't take this as an endorsement of ifa.com. I have not looked at them that closely, but they are on my list to investigate if I ever switch to a financial advisor. Wayne |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,059
|
Re: Substantial Windfalls
If BMJ's summary is correct, you are pretty risk
adverse. As you plan to continue working for awhile and your windfall will be invested in a taxable account you might consider a mix of Total Stock Market, Total International and Intermediate Term Tax Exempt to suit your risk tolerance. All of these funds are tax efficient. To spice up your overall portfolio, you might consider adding REIT, Small Cap Value and Emerging Market in your sheltered account ..... but not everyone has the stomach for rebalancing these more volatile funds even though in the aggregate they tend to reduce overall portfolio volatility. As for rebalancing your taxable account, that is an open question you and your accountant need to discuss because of the tax consequences. As for me, at age 70, all of my taxable account is in Wellesley Income because I need the income and modest growth it provides. That fund and other balanced funds do the rebalancing for you. In my IRA I use a 60/40 coffeehouse approach with the 40% fixed income mostly in floating rate CDs that are indexed to inflation. I don't use a balanced fund because RMD will have a reverse DCA effect. By using the slice and dice approach I can manage withdrawals more efficiently. Good luck and congratulations on the windfall. Have a good life, Charlie |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windfalls | arrete | FIRE and Money | 20 | 02-23-2005 11:11 AM |
|
Other
Social Knowledge
forum communities: Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 |