|
|
Surprising Results from ESPlanner
05-13-2014, 12:46 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hartford
Posts: 358
|
Surprising Results from ESPlanner
Hi All-
I have used many different programs including I-orp, csplanner, *******, Fidelity Income Planner, Vanguard's Financial Engines, a Vanguard free financial consultant, and bigfoot's google spreadsheet. In addition, like most of us, I created my own spreadsheet.
After doing all this I purchased ES Planner, to get more precise Social Security estimates.
Now that I've used it for a while I really like it, much better than any other program. The two features I like the most are the social security estimates and the tax calculations which include the AMT. Most of the other programs do not calculate taxes or if they do, they don't account for the AMT.
There are two interesting conclusions from ESPlanner that are contrary to what we thought. We thought others might be interested. (Note, most of our savings are in tax-deferred vehicles, so this affects our results.)
- If we retire at 60, it's better for us to take social security at 62. This is because doing this minimizes taxes in later years. Surprising! - (We had originally thought we should take SS at 70, with me filing and suspending and my DW taking spousal benefits from 67-70.)
- If we retire at 60, it's better for us to Roth convert a lot of tax-deferred money early, even if we "enter AMT land". (I thought it would be better to avoid AMT so this was surprising.)
I have modeled our Roth conversions in ES Planner and although it's not super easy it's really not hard. So I would not consider that a major impediment.
The $200 we spent on the program will be paid for in the first year we retire, absolutely. Just the answer on SS timing will give us a huge return on the investment.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-13-2014, 12:56 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,263
|
Taxes in retirement have been a confusing factor for me also. I noticed that ORP has me aggressively converting all my Reg IRA funds before taking SS at age 70, even if I pay 25% taxes on some of the converted money.
What final age did you use when running ESPlanner? Did your results differ if you lived 5-10 years longer or less? Just curious.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 02:38 PM
|
#3
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hartford
Posts: 358
|
Hi Chuckanut-
In answer to your "final age" question, we used 100. We didn't try any other ages.
I don't feel like I'll make that but we'll see. Just waiting for the ACA to mature to see what they allow for assisted croaking. Maybe this or when I'm ready I'll take a winter camping trip, consume some blackberry brandy, and have a snooze.
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 02:52 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,671
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImThinkin2019
Hi Chuckanut-
In answer to your "final age" question, we used 100.
I don't feel like I'll make that but we'll see. Just waiting for the ACA to mature to see what they allow for assisted croaking. Maybe this or when I'm ready I'll take a winter camping trip, consume some blackberry brandy, and have a snooze.
|
Or a bottle of tequila and a lawn chair to the Bay of Fundy at low tide.
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 04:16 PM
|
#5
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: seattle
Posts: 646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jebmke
Or a bottle of tequila and a lawn chair to the Bay of Fundy at low tide.
|
Don't forget the oyster knife.
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 05:30 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,495
|
I bought esplanner last year after someone posted they would not have made the decision to retire without it. I too think it's one of the best tools out there. Since buying it, I've been reading a lot on consumption smoothing. Esplanner served to reinforce my retirement confidence as well.
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 06:57 PM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,433
|
Question for Imthinkin and Options:
Are you planning to renew your ESPlanner subscription?
omni
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 08:21 PM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hartford
Posts: 358
|
Yes, I will renew it probably at least every 2 years until I retire, which will be in about 4 years. After that, not sure.
|
|
|
05-13-2014, 08:58 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,723
|
I am pretty far from any option with social security, and I couldn't make ESPlanner align with my reality, so I don't use it. The output was somewhat opaque too. I do like the premise, in general, but it needs an update to include the current tax law, ACA wrangling, etc.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 10:15 AM
|
#10
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 34
|
Another vote for ESP planner. I haven't worked with it enough yet to figure out how to model Roth conversions and I wish you could model withdrawals from both taxable and 401K better. So far, I can only withdraw taxable or 401k first until it is depleted then the other one. I would like to withdraw part of my 401k to a specificed tax bracket then use taxable funds for each year. I am not sure that I will follow the program's advice since I can't imagine spending that much and it suggests for us spending down our 401k and taxable to take SS at 70. But, I find it useful and it also convinced me to retiree as well. I have renewed once which was last year when I retired.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 12:16 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,743
|
I have been using ESPlanner for a couple of years now and upgraded once. I like the tool for SS and tax estimates.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 02:01 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by omni550
Question for Imthinkin and Options:
Are you planning to renew your ESPlanner subscription?
omni
|
Yes but probably not for a couple of years. Renewing would be beneficial to reflect tax updates. BTW, estimated taxes throughout retirement was one of the best features that I liked. Consumption smoothing is an entirely different approach than SWR. While I've lost track of how many calculators I've used, ESPlanner and FIDO remain my favorites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational
I am pretty far from any option with social security, and I couldn't make ESPlanner align with my reality, so I don't use it. The output was somewhat opaque too. I do like the premise, in general, but it needs an update to include the current tax law, ACA wrangling, etc.
|
I didn't find ESPlaner opaque at all. It produced the most detailed reports of anything I've used, including a lifetime spending floor, along with various possible spending trajectories. What has helped me to get the most out of it is continued research regarding consumption smoothing, and Wade Pfau's blog is among the best. I am not discounting the safe withdrawal rate strategy; to the contrary, after reading Pfau's blog I'm using a hybrid approach, fundamental to which is consumption smoothing. It all happens to work in my case.
As to the ACA, this is healthcare spending and is accounted for.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 02:18 PM
|
#13
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 103
|
Just curious for those who have purchased ESPlanner, do you use regular, Pro, or Plus versions?
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 03:11 PM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,743
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smurray5991
Just curious for those who have purchased ESPlanner, do you use regular, Pro, or Plus versions?
|
I purchased the Plus version as it has the Monte Carlo simulation and upside investing ( I am still experimenting with).
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 04:41 PM
|
#15
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 34
|
I also got the "plus" version.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 04:45 PM
|
#16
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hartford
Posts: 358
|
I got the plus version as well.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 05:21 PM
|
#17
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 497
|
I bought the pro but didn't use (understand) the upside monte carlo stuff.
I really like esplanner.
__________________
You've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
Retired July '11 investments in very low cost index and mutual funds, balance once a year at best.
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 09:52 PM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,495
|
Plus version. I took the Pro version to be geared more toward use by financial planners for their clients. I like Dick Cotton's blog, The Retirement Cafe, because he explains many concepts linked to consumption smoothing (which Kotlikoff based ESPlanner on). In Monday's entry (5/12), Cotton references modelling spending with ESPlanner, and here's another excellent entry regarding spending probabilities I found most informative:
The Retirement Cafe: Diminishing Returns
|
|
|
05-14-2014, 10:34 PM
|
#19
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 759
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Options
I bought esplanner last year after someone posted they would not have made the decision to retire without it. I too think it's one of the best tools out there. Since buying it, I've been reading a lot on consumption smoothing. Esplanner served to reinforce my retirement confidence as well.
|
That was more than likely me that would not have retired without the guidance of ESPlanner. Been retired now for 10 months and still highly recommend the software. I use the Plus version and although it takes some effort to really understand your inputs and its output, it's well worth the time if you are seriously considering early retirement.
I did pay the $50 renewal fee after my years subscription was up.
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 02:50 PM
|
#20
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,723
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Options
I didn't find ESPlaner opaque at all. It produced the most detailed reports of anything I've used, including a lifetime spending floor, along with various possible spending trajectories. What has helped me to get the most out of it is continued research regarding consumption smoothing, and Wade Pfau's blog is among the best. I am not discounting the safe withdrawal rate strategy; to the contrary, after reading Pfau's blog I'm using a hybrid approach, fundamental to which is consumption smoothing. It all happens to work in my case.
As to the ACA, this is healthcare spending and is accounted for.
|
In order to optimize, the program would have to take into consideration the ACA subsidies. It does not do that, so for people who are able to get ACA subsidies, the results are likely not optimal. As discussed in other threads, the ACA subsidies can be considered yet another layer of complexity on top of the federal taxes.
As to the opacity of the output, I tried to get it into a spreadsheet (since the application did not do what I neede it to do). But when I tried that, I found that there was no way to model the output in a spreadsheet. At least I couldn't figure out how to make sense of it. MMy goal was to run a simplified plan in ESPlanner, i-orp, and other tools and see how similar I could get the results. I could readily understand the i-orp output, but can't say the same for ESPlanner.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|