Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-13-2016, 07:55 AM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 16,435
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
The way to plan for an uncertain future is to make sure you have the resources to handle whatever may come.

Planning for an old age of reduced consumption, meanwhile, becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, regardless of whether you actually want to spend less during your later stages of life.
Excellent way to put it!

Seems odd to me that someone posting under the handle "Options" would not want to keep their options open!


ERD50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 04-13-2016, 10:23 AM   #22
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
MasterBlaster's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,360
Originally Posted by RobbieB View Post
you can spit into the ocean from the balcony.
We need photos documenting your misbehavior.

MasterBlaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2016, 11:29 AM   #23
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by RobLJ View Post
Some may be interested in a recent article on annuitization (immediate or deferred, not indexed) by Swerdloe.
Swedroe: Annuities & Problems Of Longevity |

While most of this has been discussed on other forum posts, I wonder if any are considering some use of deferred annuitization--or have implemented it--, after the ruling allowing deferred annuities to satisfy (or actually decrease) annual RMD requirements:

" In July of 2014, the Treasury department issued new regulations surrounding the purchase of deferred-income annuities in tax-deferred accounts.
The new regulations allow for the purchase of deferred-income annuities in qualified retirement accounts that begin payments after age 70.5 without violating RMD rules. However, there are certain requirements the qualified annuity must meet in order for the IRS to allow for annuitization after age 70.5:
  • Only 25% of any retirement account (or 25% of all pre-tax IRAs aggregated together) can be invested into a deferred income annuity.
  • The cumulative dollar amount invested in all deferred-income annuities across all retirement accounts may not exceed the lesser of $125,000 or the 25% threshold. The $125,000 amount will be indexed for inflation, adjusted in $10,000 increments.
  • The limitations will apply separately for both spouses with their own retirement accounts.
  • The deferred-income annuity must begin its payouts by age 85 (or earlier)."
I'm not sure how this works in practice, but assume that the RMD annual amount would be figured on the amount in retirement funds excluding the annuitized amount.

At this point, I'm not planning to do it, based on the current interest rate environment, but would consider it in the next few years if/when interest rates rise.

The scenario table was also interesting (particularly the spending improvement line), but I'm not sure how to interpret it, other than as a theoretical increased spending rate, based on annuitization.
Thanks for posting. Interesting article. The idea/benefits of insuring longevity risk has been around for a long time (tontine, e.g.).

But I don't understand the fuss about retirement accounts investing in deferred annuities. Don't the above regulations limit you to 25% of your IRA balances, or $125k? I do see how you could reduce your RMDs and insure longevity, but I thought a benefit of insuring longevity was to allow increased current spending, maybe requiring higher D.

I'll take the advice of the author and put off any decision on income annuities until I'm at least 75.

If you live to a hundred, you've got it made. Very few people die past that age. George Burns
gcgang is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is mean by the "Annuitization Hurdle"? HadEnuff FIRE and Money 23 01-14-2016 05:32 AM
Do you know/monitor your annuitization hurdle? Midpack FIRE and Money 17 01-12-2016 09:55 PM
The 4% article that started it all? Nords FIRE and Money 63 03-17-2009 08:24 AM
Question about annuitization of TIAA Rob FIRE and Money 6 02-26-2009 01:15 PM
Good Article Sock_It_Away Young Dreamers 4 04-15-2004 09:56 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.