I have read many articles and utilized many calculators (including FIRECALC).
I would like opinions from the forum members as well (especially the early retirees) on what a swr would be given no pensions or social security proceeds for a couple (ages - 57 male and 54 female).
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
So your income is coming solely from your own investments?
Because I'm an early retiree/semi-retiree and hope to be needing income for another 40 years (I'm 48), I am withdrawing less than the amount that Firecalc says will give me a 100% success rate. My current WR is about 2.5%. I may get a little bolder and increase it slightly in years to come, especially as I will have SS to help out later on.
It's a personal decision based on your own risk tolerance, the size of your portfolio, and how much income you feel you need.
__________________
ESR (and maybe ER if things go well)
3.5% on a 70/30 equities/bonds portfolio. If you don't pick the wrong equities or bonds. Right now, I am 100% equities, but still in the accumulation phase.
FIREcalc gives pretty good results, for my money.
__________________
"Ain't got no money for no old-age pension;
I'm so broke, I can't pay attention!"
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left."
I'm happy with 4%, including some flexibility to take less if the portfolio is getting too small. While that's not the 100% SWR, it's close enough. However I might also consider an SPIA if I didn't have SS.
I plan to only spend dividends from a 100% equity portfolio. This is in addition to a generous pension which provides about half my after tax spend. Current dividend yield is about 3.6%. Might increase in future if things work out.
The conventional wisdom for an indefinitely sustainable WR are closer to 3% (your case for mid-50's), if past history is any indication. 4% SWR assumes a 30 year plan, age 65.
I am planning on a lower WR like Major Tom, with 40 years to go (plan anyway), it's easier to be conservative now and spend more later than vice versa...
__________________ It's odd when I think of the arc of my life, from child to young woman to aging adult. First I was who I was. Then I didn't know who I was. Then I invented someone, and became her. Then I began to like what I'd invented. And finally I was what I was again. It turned out I wasn't alone in that particular progression. Anna Quindlen
Retired Jun 2011
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 16,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack
easier to be conservative now and spend more later than vice versa...
I agree. Always nice to look forward to a brighter future, especially as you age and begin to notice that many of your personal bests in non-financial areas are history.
__________________
"Boy, I've lived with mendacity. Now why can't you live with it? You've got to live with it. There's nothin' to live with but mendacity. Is there?" - Big Daddy talking to his son Brick, in Cat On a A Hot Tin Roof
Do you have all your income sources "on-line" at the time of your retirement? If you don't, I would suggest looking at what your eventual WR rate will be in year one when you are receiving all income, regardless of current rate as matched against your expected portfolio value at that future time.
DW/my current WD rate? More than double the 4% suggestion.
DW/my current WD rate in less than six years (after two small pensions and three SS income streams come on line?). Just over 2%, and it is not forecast to exceed 4% till our late 80's - when a higher WD rate is acceptable. And this is with exceeding "good practice" at the current time.
You have to look at the total picture - not just what is reality in the current year, under the current income situation...
I have read many articles and utilized many calculators (including FIRECALC).
I would like opinions from the forum members as well (especially the early retirees) on what a swr would be given no pensions or social security proceeds for a couple (ages - 57 male and 54 female).
Just curious.
Thanks,
Golfnut.
I'm a year older, no pension, and we will have the minimum SS. Our withdrawal this year is around 4.1%. A bit high, but we have a "plan B".
__________________
It's not the cards you're dealt in life but what you do with them that matters
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 9,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnut
... on what a swr would be given no pensions or social security proceeds for a couple ...
Just curious.
Thanks,
Golfnut.
Just to be clear, SS and pensions do not (directly) affect SWR of the portfolio.
A 4% WR is still a 4% WR regardless of any external income. It is just that if you get half your expenses from COLA'd pensions/SS, you can have a portfolio half the size as w/o.
Indirectly, if your pension/SS is enough that you feel you could get by on it w/o much draw from your portfolio - you might decide to be more risky with the portfolio and take a higher WR. Knowing there is a chance you would get wiped out and have to live off pension/SS. That risk might be OK for some.
If I had a pension or substantial SS I would find it easier to adjust my portfolio withdrawal in the face of changing circumstances, so a higher initial withdrawal would be easier to embrace. When depending entirely on the portfolio and having no other source of income, a higher number, such as 4%, is more risky unless the budget can be easily, quickly and substantially reduced. The math might be technically the same but in real life having annuity income makes an enormous difference.
__________________
It's not the cards you're dealt in life but what you do with them that matters
More than half our ER income is currently coming from our non-COLA pensions so our WR has to fill in the gap and cover inflation losses on the pensions. We are aged 57 and 56, are into our 3rd year of ER, and do expect to receive SS.
Given the long time frame (hopefully) and the shock of seeing what can happen if you retire just before a market crash, I've set our SWR at 3% for now. Who knows what it will be 10 or 20 years from now as we gain experience in the drawdown process, plus whatever fate throws our way.
__________________ Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55
Now it's adventure before dementia
I'm almost 53 and for the past three years have used a flexible approach which will always be evolving given how life unfolds. The foundation is having a handle on my essential expenses (which I easily cover) and then plan the balance of my spending from there. If the portfolio is down, I'll focus on more budget conscious activities for that year focusing on more expensive pursuits when times are better. I have a whole array of stuff I want to do in each category. For the next decade I intend to use 3% of my end of year net worth as my maximum budget for the upcoming year. I'm 50/50 Equity, Bonds rebalancing when a 10 point differential arises. Some work or a side business are considerations but only if they are enjoyable and fit into my life's current pursuits. I'll evaluate SS and significantly increasing the WR @ 62 and every year thereafter. I'm not a believer in planning to live well into my 90's sacrificing a full, healthy life now and for decades to come so I can pay someone to change my diaper and tell me my name when I'm 94.
We have no pension, SS etc and must rely entirely on our investments to fund a retirement that could last for 50+ year (at least for my wife) starting when I am 46 or 47. The absence of cash flows from pensions etc has pushed us to adopt a lower SWR which is likely to be around 2% of starting assets. If we had a COLA'd pension we'd probably be comfortable with a higher SWR.
That said, although we crunch numbers to work out our SWR, we take a rather simplistic approach and assume that we can spend less than our net income from a mostly real estate and equities portfolio each year (with a cash reserve to see us through any emergencies and a sinking fund for longer term expenses such as home renovation). If annuities ever become available here on reasonable terms, I'd consider putting some money into one or more annuities later in life.
__________________ "They were two old people facing the end of time." Charles Slack - Hetty
More than half our ER income is currently coming from our non-COLA pensions so our WR has to fill in the gap and cover inflation losses on the pensions. We are aged 57 and 56, are into our 3rd year of ER, and do expect to receive SS.
Given the long time frame (hopefully) and the shock of seeing what can happen if you retire just before a market crash, I've set our SWR at 3% for now. Who knows what it will be 10 or 20 years from now as we gain experience in the drawdown process, plus whatever fate throws our way.
Given that more than half of your retirement income is annuitized have you decided to concentrate your portfolio in equities. This would give you better protection against inflation and would seem relatively prudent? In a similar position and decided to do this. I am a little older than you and my DW a little younger. Cheers.
I have read many articles and utilized many calculators (including FIRECALC).
I would like opinions from the forum members as well (especially the early retirees) on what a swr would be given no pensions or social security proceeds for a couple (ages - 57 male and 54 female).
Just curious.
Thanks,
Golfnut.
Is this some kind of trick question? What did FIRECalc tell you?
Conventional wisdom is that the "one true SWR" is somewhere around 3-5% depending on the asset allocation, whether the retiree is willing to vary their spending, and lifespan. In other words it's a multi-variable problem lacking a simple answer.
You wouldn't do it anyway. You'd want to annuitize a portion of your assets just to make sure that you've hedged longevity risk. Social Security and pensions are just a couple of ways to do so.
__________________ *
*
The book written on E-R.org, "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement", on sale now! For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
I don't read every post anymore, so if you want me to respond then please mention my name or send me a PM. Thanks.
Is this some kind of trick question? What did FIRECalc tell you?
Conventional wisdom is that the "one true SWR" is somewhere around 3-5% depending on the asset allocation, whether the retiree is willing to vary their spending, and lifespan. In other words it's a multi-variable problem lacking a simple answer.
You wouldn't do it anyway. You'd want to annuitize a portion of your assets just to make sure that you've hedged longevity risk. Social Security and pensions are just a couple of ways to do so.
My question is not a trick question. I was curious about people's comfort level of an swr given the parameters I set forth in my original email (no pensions or ss and our ages). Got some good responses. In fact, more responses would be welcome.
Quote:
Linear Mode
