Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
TAX Question: Implications of paying self dividends only
Old 12-31-2007, 10:16 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
thefed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,794
Say I were to incorporate my business, and pay myself only dividends and no w-2 wages.

Is this possible? would this not effectively take advantage of the lower dividend tax rates for federal returns? What implications are there on the state and local level?

Just bumming out over the $$ I have to send my poor uncle sam in april
thefed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 07:32 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
thefed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefed View Post
Say I were to incorporate my business, and pay myself only dividends and no w-2 wages.

Is this possible? would this not effectively take advantage of the lower dividend tax rates for federal returns? What implications are there on the state and local level?

Just bumming out over the $$ I have to send my poor uncle sam in april
maybe i should clarify....

i know in an s-corp, which i am considering, that you're supposed to take a 'reasonable salary'. Of course REASONABLE is debatable to no end, but I'd take some salary that i can prove is reasonable


How then, would the leftover profit (disbursed as a dividend to all owners...ie ME) be taxed? I know it is not subject to payroll taxes (ss and medi)...but what about the state level? anything different than regular income on either state or federal level? i thought i read somewhere that dividends are not taxed in the same way regular income is (aside from not being subject to payroll taxeS)

Thanks!
thefed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 07:55 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Meadbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,398
I do this to great advantage. But, as we live in different countries, YMMV.
Meadbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 08:09 PM   #4
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 46
I am not an accountant, but i stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night...so I will take a stab. I think you will find that under a S-corp, what you refer to profits (to be disbursed as a dividend) will not be taxed as a dividend. Your profits will be taxed the same in the same manner as W-2 income, except it is not subject to social security/medicare taxes. One benefit of a subchapter S-corp is that you may take a section 179 deduction each year. If I were you though, I would talk to an accountant.
chrisdut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 12:00 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
thefed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdut View Post
I am not an accountant, but i stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night... One benefit of a subchapter S-corp is that you may take a section 179 deduction each year. If I were you though, I would talk to an accountant.
again, i might be wrong (usually am when it comes to taxes!!), but i thought even a sole prop can take a 179 deduction?
thefed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 07:15 PM   #6
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefed View Post
again, i might be wrong (usually am when it comes to taxes!!), but i thought even a sole prop can take a 179 deduction?
I know nothing about sole props. It may be that you can take a section 179 deduction with it.
chrisdut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 08:04 PM   #7
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefed View Post
maybe i should clarify....

i know in an s-corp, which i am considering, that you're supposed to take a 'reasonable salary'. Of course REASONABLE is debatable to no end, but I'd take some salary that i can prove is reasonable


How then, would the leftover profit (disbursed as a dividend to all owners...ie ME) be taxed? I know it is not subject to payroll taxes (ss and medi)...but what about the state level? anything different than regular income on either state or federal level? i thought i read somewhere that dividends are not taxed in the same way regular income is (aside from not being subject to payroll taxeS)

Thanks!
You're absolutely right that the salary must be fair and reasonable. I understand the Service is ramping up audits of S-Corps who pay no or low salaries to the owners. You should make sure to meet with a CPA to determine the most tax-advantageous way to set up your salary/distributions while complying with IRS regs. The IRS has listed factors they apply to determine whether a salary is reasonable.

My understanding (confirm with your CPA before relying on me!) is that the remaining distributions avoid FICA and Medicare but are still treated as ordinary income. Essentially, the owner's share of the corporate income and loss pass through to the owner and is reported on the shareholder's K-1, and he/she reports it as ordinary income on their personal tax return. There may be some limited circumstances in which a distribution can be treated as a capital gain.

That sound right folks?
Niko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 08:26 PM   #8
Moderator Emeritus
Martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 11,732
It is almost impossible for a small service business such as yours to get away with paying owners who work in the business anything other than a salary.

Anyway, an S corp "dividend" is really a distribution and is not a qualified dividend and you would pay ordinary income taxes on it, even if it was allowed as your salary was reasonable. So you only save the FICA.

Don't get greedy with the tax man.
__________________
.


Do not rely on the information provided--my posts are not to be taken as legal advice. Needless to say you must consult with your legal representative. I am not responsible for errors. If I offended you with cya I apologize. If I did not, I tried.

Last edited by Martha; 01-01-2008 at 08:47 PM.
Martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:12 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
thefed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martha View Post
It is almost impossible for a small service business such as yours to get away with paying owners who work in the business anything other than a salary.

Anyway, an S corp "dividend" is really a distribution and is not a qualified dividend and you would pay ordinary income taxes on it, even if it was allowed as your salary was reasonable. So you only save the FICA.

Don't get greedy with the tax man.

Why do you say it's almost impossible to 'get away with' paying owners a salary less than the company's profits, and the rest in a disbursement?

In my case, I average about $100/hr after expenses. To me, that is an UNreasonable rate for someone to be paid for the work I do. $20/hr is more reasonable, imho. so i figure it would make sense to pay myself wages of $20/hr...and take the rest as dividends


what am i missing?
thefed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:40 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
retire@40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefed View Post
Why do you say it's almost impossible to 'get away with' paying owners a salary less than the company's profits, and the rest in a disbursement?

In my case, I average about $100/hr after expenses. To me, that is an UNreasonable rate for someone to be paid for the work I do. $20/hr is more reasonable, imho. so i figure it would make sense to pay myself wages of $20/hr...and take the rest as dividends

what am i missing?
If it's so unreasonable, then how come the marketplace is willing to pay you an unreasonable amount?
__________________
No man is free who is not master of himself. --- Epictetus
Enjoy Yourself (It's Later Than You Think). --- Guy Lombardo
retire@40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:53 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
thefed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,794
my understanding is that "reasonable salary" should compare to what any other similar business at arms length would pay an employee (not an owner) working the same position,the same amount of hours, with the same skill set, background etc....

My market research tells me that $$ amount is in the $15-20/hr range.
thefed is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tax implications in retirement shorttimer FIRE and Money 3 02-13-2006 07:51 AM
MOVED: tax implications Nords Forum Admin 0 09-14-2005 08:05 PM
tax implications kobydog FIRE and Money 1 09-14-2005 08:03 PM
Tax Implications overseas charlottebandito FIRE and Money 4 08-09-2005 02:09 PM
real estate purchase and tax implications question vicky FIRE and Money 10 02-15-2005 07:50 AM


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Investing Channel
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 PM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0