Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
The Paradox of Wealth and the End of History Illusion
Old 02-18-2014, 09:43 PM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,011
The Paradox of Wealth and the End of History Illusion

Interesting recent Bernstein paper from last year

The Paradox of Wealth and the End of History Illusion
http://larrysiegeldotorg.files.wordp...-formatted.pdf

As an answer to the doom and gloomers he gives a fascinating historical view of the global economy, but he also points out that as things improve, returns drop.

I see it's a year old, but I don't know if it was discussed here? I ran across it recently at M*.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-18-2014, 10:41 PM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 104
A very good article, with an interesting perspective. Thanks for posting it.

I liked the list of the four essential institutions for economic prosperity. I wonder, though, about the authors claim that all four are continuing to ascend, in particular property rights. I think about the rise of government sponsored capitalism in places like China, and I see the massive growth of government in the USA. I guess I am not sure if these trends will have a positive impact on property rights.
Dwhit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 05:32 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,206
Thanks for putting up the link, I hadn't read it and I (almost) always enjoy reading Dr Bernstein's thoughts. Humans will probably always grapple with uncertainty poorly, good thing even the 'best and brightest' have gotten it wrong for centuries.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 07:09 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
Very good article. Here is the paragraph that most resonated with me:

"Gordon, in fact, makes a classic heuristic mistake, conflating that which cannot be conceived with that which is not possible. Technological breakthroughs, almost by definition, cannot be conceived of, since if they could be, they would already have been invented; it is as difficult for us to conceive of the shape of communication transportation, and energy technologies a century hence as it was for the average world citizen of 1900 to conceive of modern jet transport, the Internet, and the prosperity that these would impart."

I am a technological optimist which is why I believe "peak oil" is likely a short term worry but not a long term impediment. I also suspect that we will be able to engineer our way to accommodations to climate change, albeit with some awful impacts on some. If the doom amd gloomers are right it doesn't seem like there is any rational response for the rest of us -- we are toast. For example, with climate change, if we can't come up with technological adaptations it seems like we are thoroughly f'd since we are allegedly already past the point of conserving our way out of the problem.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 08:02 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff View Post
Very good article. Here is the paragraph that most resonated with me:

"Gordon, in fact, makes a classic heuristic mistake, conflating that which cannot be conceived with that which is not possible. Technological breakthroughs, almost by definition, cannot be conceived of, since if they could be, they would already have been invented; it is as difficult for us to conceive of the shape of communication transportation, and energy technologies a century hence as it was for the average world citizen of 1900 to conceive of modern jet transport, the Internet, and the prosperity that these would impart."

I am a technological optimist which is why I believe "peak oil" is likely a short term worry but not a long term impediment. I also suspect that we will be able to engineer our way to accommodations to climate change, albeit with some awful impacts on some. If the doom amd gloomers are right it doesn't seem like there is any rational response for the rest of us -- we are toast. For example, with climate change, if we can't come up with technological adaptations it seems like we are thoroughly f'd since we are allegedly already past the point of conserving our way out of the problem.
We will do the right thing, after all other avenues have been explored...
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire

...not doing anything of true substance...
HFWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 01:01 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
dtbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Madison
Posts: 1,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff View Post
Very good article. Here is the paragraph that most resonated with me:

"Gordon, in fact, makes a classic heuristic mistake, conflating that which cannot be conceived with that which is not possible. Technological breakthroughs, almost by definition, cannot be conceived of, since if they could be, they would already have been invented; it is as difficult for us to conceive of the shape of communication transportation, and energy technologies a century hence as it was for the average world citizen of 1900 to conceive of modern jet transport, the Internet, and the prosperity that these would impart."

I am a technological optimist which is why I believe "peak oil" is likely a short term worry but not a long term impediment. I also suspect that we will be able to engineer our way to accommodations to climate change, albeit with some awful impacts on some. If the doom amd gloomers are right it doesn't seem like there is any rational response for the rest of us -- we are toast. For example, with climate change, if we can't come up with technological adaptations it seems like we are thoroughly f'd since we are allegedly already past the point of conserving our way out of the problem.
I'm on the same page with you. The next decade will most likely see some fabulous technological inventions that no one can see at present. And it is very possible that some of those inventions can reverse (or at least moderate) climate change. Could anyone in the 1950's have believed that in less than 20 years a man would be walking on the moon??
__________________
Wild Bill shoulda taken more out of his IRA when he could have. . . .
dtbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2014, 01:28 PM   #7
Full time employment: Posting here.
CaliforniaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 880
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtbach View Post
I'm on the same page with you. The next decade will most likely see some fabulous technological inventions that no one can see at present. And it is very possible that some of those inventions can reverse (or at least moderate) climate change. Could anyone in the 1950's have believed that in less than 20 years a man would be walking on the moon??
I am with you on technological change, I think it will more likely accelerate than slow down. When we landed on the moon no one could have predicted personal computers or the internet. On the other hand, in 1972 could anyone have imagined that no one would step foot on the moon again for over 41 years and counting, or that the next country to do it might likely be the People's Republic of China?
__________________
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
Life is but a dream.
CaliforniaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cool Illusion eytonxav Other topics 4 01-17-2014 11:42 AM
"Lipitor Paradox" SarahW Health and Early Retirement 89 04-06-2011 10:23 PM
HGTV: Another cherished illusion busted. Nords Other topics 1 06-23-2006 07:07 AM
Progress Paradox Interview dimwit FIRE and Money 3 07-13-2005 12:10 AM
Good book - The Progress Paradox Telly Other topics 18 09-07-2004 04:03 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.