|
The Paradox of Wealth and the End of History Illusion
02-18-2014, 09:43 PM
|
#1
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,011
|
The Paradox of Wealth and the End of History Illusion
Interesting recent Bernstein paper from last year
The Paradox of Wealth and the End of History Illusion
http://larrysiegeldotorg.files.wordp...-formatted.pdf
As an answer to the doom and gloomers he gives a fascinating historical view of the global economy, but he also points out that as things improve, returns drop.
I see it's a year old, but I don't know if it was discussed here? I ran across it recently at M*.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-18-2014, 10:41 PM
|
#2
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 104
|
A very good article, with an interesting perspective. Thanks for posting it.
I liked the list of the four essential institutions for economic prosperity. I wonder, though, about the authors claim that all four are continuing to ascend, in particular property rights. I think about the rise of government sponsored capitalism in places like China, and I see the massive growth of government in the USA. I guess I am not sure if these trends will have a positive impact on property rights.
|
|
|
02-19-2014, 05:32 AM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,206
|
Thanks for putting up the link, I hadn't read it and I (almost) always enjoy reading Dr Bernstein's thoughts. Humans will probably always grapple with uncertainty poorly, good thing even the 'best and brightest' have gotten it wrong for centuries.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
02-19-2014, 07:09 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
|
Very good article. Here is the paragraph that most resonated with me:
"Gordon, in fact, makes a classic heuristic mistake, conflating that which cannot be conceived with that which is not possible. Technological breakthroughs, almost by definition, cannot be conceived of, since if they could be, they would already have been invented; it is as difficult for us to conceive of the shape of communication transportation, and energy technologies a century hence as it was for the average world citizen of 1900 to conceive of modern jet transport, the Internet, and the prosperity that these would impart."
I am a technological optimist which is why I believe "peak oil" is likely a short term worry but not a long term impediment. I also suspect that we will be able to engineer our way to accommodations to climate change, albeit with some awful impacts on some. If the doom amd gloomers are right it doesn't seem like there is any rational response for the rest of us -- we are toast. For example, with climate change, if we can't come up with technological adaptations it seems like we are thoroughly f'd since we are allegedly already past the point of conserving our way out of the problem.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
02-19-2014, 08:02 AM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
Very good article. Here is the paragraph that most resonated with me:
"Gordon, in fact, makes a classic heuristic mistake, conflating that which cannot be conceived with that which is not possible. Technological breakthroughs, almost by definition, cannot be conceived of, since if they could be, they would already have been invented; it is as difficult for us to conceive of the shape of communication transportation, and energy technologies a century hence as it was for the average world citizen of 1900 to conceive of modern jet transport, the Internet, and the prosperity that these would impart."
I am a technological optimist which is why I believe "peak oil" is likely a short term worry but not a long term impediment. I also suspect that we will be able to engineer our way to accommodations to climate change, albeit with some awful impacts on some. If the doom amd gloomers are right it doesn't seem like there is any rational response for the rest of us -- we are toast. For example, with climate change, if we can't come up with technological adaptations it seems like we are thoroughly f'd since we are allegedly already past the point of conserving our way out of the problem.
|
We will do the right thing, after all other avenues have been explored...
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire
...not doing anything of true substance...
|
|
|
02-19-2014, 01:01 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Madison
Posts: 1,337
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
Very good article. Here is the paragraph that most resonated with me:
"Gordon, in fact, makes a classic heuristic mistake, conflating that which cannot be conceived with that which is not possible. Technological breakthroughs, almost by definition, cannot be conceived of, since if they could be, they would already have been invented; it is as difficult for us to conceive of the shape of communication transportation, and energy technologies a century hence as it was for the average world citizen of 1900 to conceive of modern jet transport, the Internet, and the prosperity that these would impart."
I am a technological optimist which is why I believe "peak oil" is likely a short term worry but not a long term impediment. I also suspect that we will be able to engineer our way to accommodations to climate change, albeit with some awful impacts on some. If the doom amd gloomers are right it doesn't seem like there is any rational response for the rest of us -- we are toast. For example, with climate change, if we can't come up with technological adaptations it seems like we are thoroughly f'd since we are allegedly already past the point of conserving our way out of the problem.
|
I'm on the same page with you. The next decade will most likely see some fabulous technological inventions that no one can see at present. And it is very possible that some of those inventions can reverse (or at least moderate) climate change. Could anyone in the 1950's have believed that in less than 20 years a man would be walking on the moon??
__________________
Wild Bill shoulda taken more out of his IRA when he could have. . . .
|
|
|
02-19-2014, 01:28 PM
|
#7
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtbach
I'm on the same page with you. The next decade will most likely see some fabulous technological inventions that no one can see at present. And it is very possible that some of those inventions can reverse (or at least moderate) climate change. Could anyone in the 1950's have believed that in less than 20 years a man would be walking on the moon??
|
I am with you on technological change, I think it will more likely accelerate than slow down. When we landed on the moon no one could have predicted personal computers or the internet. On the other hand, in 1972 could anyone have imagined that no one would step foot on the moon again for over 41 years and counting, or that the next country to do it might likely be the People's Republic of China?
__________________
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
Life is but a dream.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|