Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
The Sky May Actully Be Falling
Old 07-13-2008, 11:17 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,770
Just checking in on a free hotel computer from Dawson Creek BC, on my way further north. Caught the news that Fannie & Freddie are getting bailed out, $5T (yes T) in assets at issue. Don't know what it all means but the market could be interesting tomorrow depending on how this is viewed. Breadlines next?

By the way, I'm still buying occasionally so maybe this will be an opportunity,could be the bottom soon as folks could certainly panic on this one.
__________________
“There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The
other is as though everything is a miracle.” - Albert Einstein
yakers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 11:59 PM   #2
Full time employment: Posting here.
Retire Soon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 551
The latest line is that the Treasury department is frantically attempting to "shore up confidence" in the financial markets by announcing a drive to persuade congress to approve an increase in the line of credit for FNMA and Freddie Mac.

Treasury and Fed Pledge Aid For Ailing Mortgage Giants - WSJ.com
Retire Soon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:10 AM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
laurence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,958
I'll admit this news is the first where I haven't rolled my eyes - completely - at the doomsday reactions. I'm still not stocking up on ammo and k-rations but I took notice. I may be gritting my teeth and mumbling "buying opportunity, dollar cost average" all week long.
laurence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:14 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,113
It depends on what your definition of "bailed out" is.

Audrey
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:21 AM   #5
Moderator Emeritus
laurence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,958
Considering their role in the markets, failure isn't an option. Talk about credit crunch if that happend.
laurence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:29 AM   #6
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 143
The sky might be falling, but it has fallen worse before even in relatively recent history:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/business/14bank.html

Quote:
The nation’s banks are in far less danger than they were in the late 1980s and early 1990s, when more than 1,000 federally insured institutions went under during the savings-and-loan crisis. The debacle, the greatest collapse of American financial institutions since the Depression, prompted a government bailout that cost taxpayers about $125 billion.

But the troubles are growing so rapidly at some small and midsize banks that as many as 150 out of the 7,500 banks nationwide could fail over the next 12 to 18 months, analysts say. Other lenders are likely to shut branches or seek mergers.
rogersteciak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:43 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,113
Considering that Fannie and Freddie were intially created by the US government in order to foster a liquid mortgage market and enable average Joe to buy a home, it would be ridiculous for the same government to stand by and do nothing while these companies faltered and became impaired to continue to issue mortgage backed notes.

It's been a wild ride, and the panic has seemed ridiculous when the default rates on Fannie and Freddie mortgages are at only 0.8% in one case, and 1.2% in another. Yet the equity markets have become totally panicked on these companies, coming to believe that the Bush government would allow shareholder equity in these companies to be wiped out. There has been quite a little ideological war going on between the markets and the Bush goverment's desire to somehow distance themselves from the "implied" government backing of these agencies. This has resulted in the equity of these companies going into free fall.

The Bush government finally blinked.

Since Freddie needs to auction notes on Monday to continue it's role as a mortgage provider, the government had to at least provide some confidence that it would facilitate whatever was needed to allow these agencies to continue their traditional role.

Anything else would shut down the mortgage market far worse than the subprime fiasco ever did.

It's been yet another wild confidence game (in the literal sense).

It's probably true that there are things about the Fannie and Freddie structure that could be improved, and it does seem odd that they operate as private companies with shareholders getting the benefits of taking risks, yet the US taxpayer potentially ultimately liable for the downside, but the whole process to get to this point seemed like a pretty insane drama.

Audrey
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Highly Unusual
Old 07-14-2008, 01:29 AM   #8
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 268
" The sweeping measures to restore confidence in Fannie and Freddie — and the housing market in general — came ahead of a critical attempt by Freddie to borrow $3 billion from Wall Street today. The Government worked furiously behind the scenes over the weekend to ensure that Freddie Mac is able to sell the $3 billion of short-term debt in the group in a “Dutch auction” today — and at an acceptable interest rate. Treasury officials took the highly unusual step of calling leading banks and urging them to buy Freddie’s debt."

The Times
boont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 08:40 AM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
brewer12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
Considering that Fannie and Freddie were intially created by the US government in order to foster a liquid mortgage market and enable average Joe to buy a home, it would be ridiculous for the same government to stand by and do nothing while these companies faltered and became impaired to continue to issue mortgage backed notes.

It's been a wild ride, and the panic has seemed ridiculous when the default rates on Fannie and Freddie mortgages are at only 0.8% in one case, and 1.2% in another. Yet the equity markets have become totally panicked on these companies, coming to believe that the Bush government would allow shareholder equity in these companies to be wiped out. There has been quite a little ideological war going on between the markets and the Bush goverment's desire to somehow distance themselves from the "implied" government backing of these agencies. This has resulted in the equity of these companies going into free fall.

The Bush government finally blinked.

Since Freddie needs to auction notes on Monday to continue it's role as a mortgage provider, the government had to at least provide some confidence that it would facilitate whatever was needed to allow these agencies to continue their traditional role.

Anything else would shut down the mortgage market far worse than the subprime fiasco ever did.

It's been yet another wild confidence game (in the literal sense).

It's probably true that there are things about the Fannie and Freddie structure that could be improved, and it does seem odd that they operate as private companies with shareholders getting the benefits of taking risks, yet the US taxpayer potentially ultimately liable for the downside, but the whole process to get to this point seemed like a pretty insane drama.

Audrey
Wow, you said exactly what I have been thinking about this. FWIW, I think the whole thing is a manufactured problem with no basis in reality.

Oh, and I think this may indicate a bottom, at least for now.
__________________
"And Jesus spake, 'Become thou now fishers of adjustable rate mortgages'" - New Conservative Bible
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 11:55 AM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Wow, you said exactly what I have been thinking about this. FWIW, I think the whole thing is a manufactured problem with no basis in reality.

Oh, and I think this may indicate a bottom, at least for now.
It's good to know that my layman's superficial grasp of what is going on is not completely off base!

It might have been a good bottom, except that banks are failing! Here we go for another round of bank panics.

Audrey
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:02 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
brewer12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
It might have been a good bottom, except that banks are failing! Here we go for another round of bank panics.

Audrey

The frustrating thing about this round of nonsense is that the market is making little distoinction between banks. So the shakiest are going down right along with some of the safest and best-run banks in the US.
__________________
"And Jesus spake, 'Become thou now fishers of adjustable rate mortgages'" - New Conservative Bible
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:42 PM   #12
Full time employment: Posting here.
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
The frustrating thing about this round of nonsense is that the market is making little distoinction between banks. So the shakiest are going down right along with some of the safest and best-run banks in the US.
That's a buying opportunity.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:13 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Wow, you said exactly what I have been thinking about this. FWIW, I think the whole thing is a manufactured problem with no basis in reality.

Oh, and I think this may indicate a bottom, at least for now.
if the US Government has to pump a few hundred billion $$$ to support the GSE's debts, isn't it the same thing as pumping money into the system via the Fed? you are still pumping money into the system which can lead to higher inflation. and if you have to borrow than the deficit/GDP equation changes and it can affect T-Bill prices
al_bundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 08:59 AM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
. . . and it does seem odd that they operate as private companies with shareholders getting the benefits of taking risks, yet the US taxpayer potentially ultimately liable for the downside, but the whole process to get to this point seemed like a pretty insane drama.
Audrey
So, are the traders rushing in to buy the beaten-down stocks of Fannie and Freddy now that the last smidgen of doubt concerning the federal safety net has been removed? Sure, the Fed's don't guarantee the stock price, but surely this lowers the perceived risk of their business model.

And, while we're on the subject, why is the FDIC a "corporation"? Doesn't some of this stuff fall into the category of "inherently governmental" tasks?
__________________
"Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite." - R. Heinlein
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 09:27 AM   #15
Moderator
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
So, are the traders rushing in to buy the beaten-down stocks of Fannie and Freddy now that the last smidgen of doubt concerning the federal safety net has been removed? Sure, the Fed's don't guarantee the stock price, but surely this lowers the perceived risk of their business model.

And, while we're on the subject, why is the FDIC a "corporation"? Doesn't some of this stuff fall into the category of "inherently governmental" tasks?
Perhaps you are assuming that government organization is designed in a logical way.
__________________
"Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harborless immensities." - - H. Melville, 1851
W2R is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 09:33 AM   #16
Moderator
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 7,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Want2retire View Post
Perhaps you are assuming that government organization is designed in a logical way.
How would you know that? It's not like you've had much of a chance to have a first-hand impression about how it works...
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 09:46 AM   #17
Moderator
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
How would you know that? It's not like you've had much of a chance to have a first-hand impression about how it works...
Moi? tee hee
__________________
"Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harborless immensities." - - H. Melville, 1851
W2R is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 09:58 AM   #18
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oahu
Posts: 17,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by laurencewill View Post
Considering their role in the markets, failure isn't an option.
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
Considering that Fannie and Freddie were intially created by the US government in order to foster a liquid mortgage market and enable average Joe to buy a home, it would be ridiculous for the same government to stand by and do nothing while these companies faltered and became impaired to continue to issue mortgage backed notes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
Sure, the Fed's don't guarantee the stock price, but surely this lowers the perceived risk of their business model.
And, while we're on the subject, why is the FDIC a "corporation"? Doesn't some of this stuff fall into the category of "inherently governmental" tasks?
Hey, that's why they're called "government-sponsored entities".

It's interesting that nothing has actually happened other than extending a credit line and spewing out a few press releases. Yet you'd think that a fleet of cash-filled helicopters has been dispatched to Fannie & Freddie's HQs.

If nothing else, this year has hopefully helped people to be a bit more paranoid about taking on lifestyle debt. And maybe it's helped the regulators to clamp down on all the recent financing innovations-- like forbidding the use of the word "fixed" to refer to adjustable-rate mortgages!

Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Wow, you said exactly what I have been thinking about this. FWIW, I think the whole thing is a manufactured problem with no basis in reality.
Oh, and I think this may indicate a bottom, at least for now.
I think the most frustrating aspect of this hysteria has been trying to estimate its effect.

People can figure out that a stock is getting to be a value. But it's awful darn frustrating to buy a bargain and watch it go down another 25%. Patience my ass, I wanna buy something...
__________________
*
*
For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:03 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
brewer12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords View Post
It's interesting that nothing has actually happened other than extending a credit line and spewing out a few press releases. Yet you'd think that a fleet of cash-filled helicopters has been dispatched to Fannie & Freddie's HQs.
The other funny thing about the wekkend's annnouncement's was the SEC's laughable intention to start looking into market manipulation via rumor mongering. Hey morons: if you want to clamp down on manipulation, reinstate to uptick rule on short selling!
__________________
"And Jesus spake, 'Become thou now fishers of adjustable rate mortgages'" - New Conservative Bible
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:45 PM   #20
Full time employment: Posting here.
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
The other funny thing about the wekkend's annnouncement's was the SEC's laughable intention to start looking into market manipulation via rumor mongering. Hey morons: if you want to clamp down on manipulation, reinstate to uptick rule on short selling!
I think the SEC is right. Only CEOs should be allowed to use false or misleading information to manipulate support stock prices.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The sky really is falling... REWahoo Other topics 53 02-21-2008 02:16 PM
Is the sky falling? Dow is way down any hope Sunny101 FIRE and Money 45 11-14-2007 08:53 PM
The sky is McCulleying, the . . . . greg FIRE and Money 11 09-02-2005 10:04 AM
The sky is falling, the sky is falling greg FIRE and Money 110 08-24-2005 02:17 AM
Re: The sky is falling wabmester Other topics 28 04-21-2004 08:21 AM


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Investing Channel
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0