I was reading an earlier thread, and this got me thinking ...
A few years ago, I had a really bad year income wise, so I simply converted a small IRA I had, and ended up with about $9K in line 43 taxable income, with negligible tax liability. It was like a free conversion.
I am now going to transfer my nice, still fairly fat 401K to a traditional IRA. I plan to spend most of my time in a low cost foreign country, only bleeding a little bit off the 401K (with the 10% penalty ) as I need to. If the bleed would not be too high, then it seems that it would similarly make absolute financial sense to continue and convert any amount of traditional IRA to Roth IRA in which my line 43 taxable income would be below the total of the standard deduction, standard exemption(s), and capital loss (i.e., with my $32K in capital losses over the last 2 years, I will be able to use $3K of the carryover loss for the next 10 years!) And of course, so long as I would spend a lot of time abroad, any income I would receive would be tax-free (under a certain amount.)
So as a single person, taking 2009 as an example, I would essentially have a 0% tax rate up to $5700 (standard deduction) + $3650 (exemption) + $3000 (capital loss carryover) = $12350. And if I were married with a family, it would similarly be $21700 + $3650 for every child. And if the 0% rate were extended via a higher standard deduction or exemption (which I think Obama will push for as a back door way of lowering taxes on middle income taxpayers while raising taxes on the wealthy), then even more could be in this range.
What do you think?
A few years ago, I had a really bad year income wise, so I simply converted a small IRA I had, and ended up with about $9K in line 43 taxable income, with negligible tax liability. It was like a free conversion.
I am now going to transfer my nice, still fairly fat 401K to a traditional IRA. I plan to spend most of my time in a low cost foreign country, only bleeding a little bit off the 401K (with the 10% penalty ) as I need to. If the bleed would not be too high, then it seems that it would similarly make absolute financial sense to continue and convert any amount of traditional IRA to Roth IRA in which my line 43 taxable income would be below the total of the standard deduction, standard exemption(s), and capital loss (i.e., with my $32K in capital losses over the last 2 years, I will be able to use $3K of the carryover loss for the next 10 years!) And of course, so long as I would spend a lot of time abroad, any income I would receive would be tax-free (under a certain amount.)
So as a single person, taking 2009 as an example, I would essentially have a 0% tax rate up to $5700 (standard deduction) + $3650 (exemption) + $3000 (capital loss carryover) = $12350. And if I were married with a family, it would similarly be $21700 + $3650 for every child. And if the 0% rate were extended via a higher standard deduction or exemption (which I think Obama will push for as a back door way of lowering taxes on middle income taxpayers while raising taxes on the wealthy), then even more could be in this range.
What do you think?