|
|
Thoughts and concerns about a high SWR
10-25-2016, 02:40 PM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
|
Thoughts and concerns about a high SWR
Hello...
I am 58 (married - DW retired) and still working at mega corp. Our retirement savings are a bit over $1.1MM and are currently in a couple of traditional IRAs and an employer 401k. I am looking at the possibility of hanging it up in 2017. However, if I do, my WR for the first 7-8 years will be fairly high - 7-8%. But after SS kicks in, it will drop to around 2.5% for the remainder of our lives. I've run lots of scenarios and calculations using both Firecalc and Flexible Retirement Planner and results are in the 95-100% success range.
What are your thoughts/concerns about this scenario? Would you be comfortable calling it a career if you were in my shoes?
I know all about the '4% rule of thumb' but I'd have to keep working for 7-8 more years before I could reach that level.
Thank you in advance for the feedback.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-25-2016, 02:50 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 25,290
|
What about health insurance?
The premium increase numbers in the threads on that topic are scary. http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...ive-83899.html
__________________
When I was a kid I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 02:55 PM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
|
Yes, I've definitely considered health insurance and I've budgeted appropriately for it at this point. Of course, who knows what 2018 and beyond have in store.
Thank you.
P.S. Based on the estimates I'm seeing, the monthly prem would be covered almost completely by the subsidy for the lowest level bronze plan.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 02:59 PM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
|
If those planners work, you are probably ok. But before I gave any assurances I'd want to know how realistic your expense figures are. Do they account for things like major irregular repairs and replacements, travel, and yes, increased medical costs? The planners are only as accurate as the data you put into them.
Another way to look at this is to annuitize SS and any pension and figure your SWR on that value + your $1.1M.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:01 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem
Hello...
I am 58 (married - DW retired) and still working at mega corp. Our retirement savings are a bit over $1.1MM and are currently in a couple of traditional IRAs and an employer 401k. I am looking at the possibility of hanging it up in 2017. However, if I do, my WR for the first 7-8 years will be fairly high - 9-10%. But after SS kicks in, it will drop to around 2.5% for the remainder of our lives. I've run lots of scenarios and calculations using both Firecalc and Flexible Retirement Planner and results are in the 95-100% success range.
What are your thoughts/concerns about this scenario? Would you be comfortable calling it a career if you were in my shoes?
I know all about the '4% rule of thumb' but I'd have to keep working for 7-8 more years before I could reach that level.
Thank you in advance for the feedback.
|
A lot will depend on the specific circumstances, but if you really need THAT kind of withdrawal rate for the first 8 years you better hope there isn't a serious market correction in the first few years or else you'll bust. That is, unless you are accounting for plenty of discretionary expenses that you could drastically cut, if needed.
Have you considered taking SS at age 62? That way you only need to "deep-draw" 3 years? Also, when can your DW draw SS?
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:02 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Even without health insurance issues, this is a very high risk plan. Say the market doesn't break, but neither does it go on a tear. Say your expenses turn out to be as estimated with no emergencies. You could still mortally depleted your portfolio in the period before you can tap the non-portfolio cash flows.
Ha
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:10 PM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem
P.S. Based on the estimates I'm seeing, the monthly prem would be covered almost completely by the subsidy for the lowest level bronze plan.
|
You expect to get an ACA subsidy with an income of ~$100K?
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:12 PM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,369
|
Have you looked a VPW as a withdrawal method? It's described over on bogleheads, along with a spreadsheet. I created my own spreadsheet because their spreadsheet is restrictive as to which investments you can backtest with. It is a variable withdrawal method, so you have to be able to still live with lower withdrawals in some of the worst case historical scenarios. But it can never completely run out of money before N years of retirement (where you choose N at the beginning of retirement).
There is also a thread over there started by the guy (longinvest) who came up with VPW who advocates a SS "bridge" between the start of early retirement and the time you take SS. He advocates a TIPs ladder as a bridge to SS. The stream from the bridge would match what you get in SS once it starts. Since it's TIPs, you have built in inflation adjustments though with interest rate risk. Alternatively, you could try and build a CD ladder.
I once backtested just withdrawing the SS amount, increased by inflation each year, from my portfolio with the remaining amount withdrawn using VPW and that also seemed to provide decent results for my particular case. Of course for some there will be combinations of #years of bridging coupled with amount of SS being bridged that might not work out so well for some.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:22 PM
|
#9
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 950
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem
Hello...
But after SS kicks in, it will drop to around 2.5% for the remainder of our lives. I've run lots of scenarios and calculations using both Firecalc and Flexible Retirement Planner and results are in the 95-100% success range.
|
I always run Firecalc with the loss of my own or my DH's social security for the final 15 years of the plan assuming that one of us will live at least 15 years longer than the other.(DH is 18 months younger than I) We believe that the remaining one of us will probably spend a huge amount in those last 10-15 years because of required care, probably the bulk of our investments.
If you haven't run the calculators assuming that only one social security amount will be available for a period of time, it may be a helpful insight.
__________________
"Some people describe themselves as being able to see things as a glass half full. For some, the glass is half empty. Me? I can't even find the f***king glass."
Silver
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:27 PM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Collin County, TX
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver
I always run Firecalc with the loss of my own or my DH's social security for the final 15 years of the plan assuming that one of us will live at least 15 years longer than the other. We believe that the remaining one of us will probably spend a huge amount in those last 10-15 years because of required care, probably the bulk of our investments.
If you haven't run the calculators assuming that only one social security amount will be available for a period of time, it may be a helpful insight.
|
I agree. At some point, one will be left alone without the additional social security payment.
Personally, having to take 9 or 10 percent out for a few years (especially if the majority of the expenses are essential) would scare the crap out of me.
__________________
There's no need to complicate, our time is short..
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:41 PM
|
#11
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Austria
Posts: 111
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem
Hello...
I am 58 (married - DW retired) and still working at mega corp. Our retirement savings are a bit over $1.1MM and are currently in a couple of traditional IRAs and an employer 401k. I am looking at the possibility of hanging it up in 2017. However, if I do, my WR for the first 7-8 years will be fairly high - 9-10%. But after SS kicks in, it will drop to around 2.5% for the remainder of our lives. I've run lots of scenarios and calculations using both Firecalc and Flexible Retirement Planner and results are in the 95-100% success range.
What are your thoughts/concerns about this scenario? Would you be comfortable calling it a career if you were in my shoes?
I know all about the '4% rule of thumb' but I'd have to keep working for 7-8 more years before I could reach that level.
Thank you in advance for the feedback.
|
so 9-10% over 7-8 years means somewhere between $690k and $880k before SS kicks in which would look ugly if the market drops by 20%. Are you really saying your average expenses are between 100 and 110k per annum? That seems very high to me.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:44 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem
Yes, I've definitely considered health insurance and I've budgeted appropriately for it at this point. Of course, who knows what 2018 and beyond have in store.
Thank you.
P.S. Based on the estimates I'm seeing, the monthly prem would be covered almost completely by the subsidy for the lowest level bronze plan.
|
Don't see how you'll get the subsidy with that SWR from an IRA.
Something is wrong here.
You are playing with fire with that SWR on many levels.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:47 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinger1457
You expect to get an ACA subsidy with an income of ~$100K?
|
Just because you spend $100K does not mean you have a $100K taxable income... or even MAGI...
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 03:55 PM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
Just because you spend $100K does not mean you have a $100K taxable income... or even MAGI...
|
The OP stated his income stream for the first few years will be from a tIRA and 401K so more than likely it is taxable.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 04:00 PM
|
#15
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinger1457
The OP stated his income stream for the first few years will be from a tIRA and 401K so more than likely it is taxable.
|
OK, OK. I'll calm down. Sounds like OP is thinking clearly. I'm not. A little panicking for the OP on my part.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 04:09 PM
|
#16
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 216
|
Look at it this way. You need two buckets of money. The first bucket needs to last 7 years, so the 4% rule of thumb doesn't apply to that bucket. That bucket should be invested very conservatively. The second bucket contains the remainder of your money, and it needs to last until you pass, and should be invested accordingly. That bucket needs to meet the 4% rule of thumb.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 04:14 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains
Posts: 2,778
|
Although less pronounced, this is similar to my scenario as well. Thanks for the idea to model various scenarios involving stopping SS early for either partner, and I'll be sure to study the VPW concept over at Bogleheads. I find interesting the idea of an inflation-protected, fixed-income investment to create an income stream to bridge the SS gap.
But, that said, is it necessarily a bad thing that the withdrawal rate is high for the years bridging ER and SS, IF there's enough capital saved to accommodate that? Presumably, tools like FireCalc model the worst-case, historical market cases.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 04:18 PM
|
#18
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
|
Okay, sorry. I need to correct some info from my first post.
I have a 'legal obligation' that will go away in 2021. Expenses will drop by over $1000 per month at that point. Expenses for the first 4 years will be around $6500 and will drop to around $5500 in 2021. All healthcare expenses have been accounted for and there is obviously some discretionary spending included in the budget, such as travel.
It's difficult to show this type of spending pattern in the retirement tools but I did use the 'off chart spending' in Firecalc to simulate the 'legal obligation' going away.
Thanks for all the feedback so far.
P.S. This 'legal obligation' is completely tax deductible and will immediately reduce MAGI.
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 04:20 PM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinger1457
The OP stated his income stream for the first few years will be from a tIRA and 401K so more than likely it is taxable.
|
I saw where he said his money is mostly in those accounts, but I did not see where he said all his income will be coming from them... but, I can see how that can easily be read into his post... I just did not jump to that conclusion....
Edit... just saw OP posted his expenses are less... $78K for now...
|
|
|
10-25-2016, 04:29 PM
|
#20
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
|
Apologies again.....one more piece of info - We have some rental properties bringing in around $7-8k per year. We might sell them eventually which would add around $75k to the nest egg.
If it helps any, current approximate NW is around $1.4MM.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|