Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Thoughts on Fees ??
Old 11-21-2017, 08:38 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Fort Myers, FL & Lake Of the Ozarks, MO
Posts: 223
Thoughts on Fees ??

We are into our 4th year of retirement, have rolled our 401k into IRA's with Fidelity Investments ......

While we worked I always picked our funds from the cafeteria that was available and now 30 years later we I find myself not very educated, as well as I wonder if I should be paying Fidelity (Private Client Group) extra to manage our IRA's

Your Thoughts .......
__________________
Live Life
LakeRat1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 11-21-2017, 08:52 PM   #2
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 953
I feel like this roller coaster is ready to depart the station again!

Check out the Another Financial Advisor Question thread that is flaming away currently.
__________________
Well it's all right, we're heading to the end of the line...
Clone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 03:37 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
DrRoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,939
Educate yourself to manage your $ and keep the fee in your pocket.
__________________
"The mountains are calling, and I must go." John Muir
DrRoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 05:32 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 85
It depends. If you never had interest in becoming a do-it-yourself investor, it is unlikely you would now.

Choosing lowest cost advisor is not a bad idea:
- Vanguard PAS service costs 0.3% of assets
- Robo Advisors (such as Schwab Intel Portfolio) are available for no cost
- Robo Advisors (such as fidelity Go) are available at cost
- Set and Forget simple portfolios like 2-fund or 3-fund available

So...choose whichever method works best for your time/energy/emotions.
pn3069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 05:46 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
target2019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeRat1 View Post
While we worked I always picked our funds from the cafeteria that was available and now 30 years later we I find myself not very educated, as well as I wonder if I should be paying Fidelity (Private Client Group) extra to manage our IRA's
It sounds like some of your investments are under asset management. Is that correct?

Picking from a cafeteria now sounds like a good idea. First, you need to establish what you have. Take various accounts, list each fund or investment within each area. Identify the category for each investment. Then make calculations to find present allocation percentage of each fund.

Do you have a spreadsheet program? Familiar with its use? If so, it is worth your time to make an analysis of what you have invested, in cash, etc.
target2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 06:00 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Once your total fees are under about 0.08% of your total portfolio value including the underlying expense ratios of your investments, the fees you pay to any advisor, the fees for commissions, etc, then it really doesn't matter what you do.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 07:31 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
VanWinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tellico Village
Posts: 2,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
Once your total fees are under about 0.08% of your total portfolio value including the underlying expense ratios of your investments, the fees you pay to any advisor, the fees for commissions, etc, then it really doesn't matter what you do.
+1
You won't get an advisor at .08

Going forward the consensus is about 4% real for the next 10 years. Those that give up 1% to fees are giving up 25% of their living withdrawals.

The less you pay, the more you keep. A simple 3 fund portfolio of a US total stock fund, a Foreign Stock fund, and an intermediate term total bond fund will beat 87% of the portfolios out there. If you want to be in the 13% that outperform, it is never the same fund each year, good luck.

VW

p.s. I do mix in a little Wellesley Income fund(active) just for fun.
VanWinkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 07:43 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
MRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,078
I sat in a Fidelity pitch on Private Client. Very expensive and they loved expensive managed funds. I thought all the fees made it almost 2%!
MRG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 07:47 AM   #9
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 504
Why didn’t anyone mention a fee only advisor. Flat rate per hour for a few hours maybe every other year if all you are doing is picking stocks and getting a gut check.

Assuming you can manage SWR and weather market fluctuations without panic selling.
pj.mask is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 08:21 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
No matter what you do, you should track the performance of your portfolio against a benchmark. Otherwise, you will not know how you are doing and whether you are falling way behind something simpler and less expensive.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 08:30 AM   #11
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj.mask View Post
Why didn’t anyone mention a fee only advisor. Flat rate per hour for a few hours maybe every other year if all you are doing is picking stocks and getting a gut check.

Assuming you can manage SWR and weather market fluctuations without panic selling.
This is a good idea too..
pn3069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 08:41 AM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clone View Post
I feel like this roller coaster is ready to depart the station again!

Check out the Another Financial Advisor Question thread that is flaming away currently.
+1 on this other thread....

Basic info on this...

Most people on this board do not think a FA is worth the money...

Most people on this board are smarter than the avg person and can handle their own affairs with some outside help...

Some people think they do not know enough about investing and other aspects of finance that a FA is well worth the money...

The question is where do you fall?


As someone else said, I would go fee based if I thought I needed help... get the help and be done... I just do not think that I need any, but I have a finance background...
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 10:59 AM   #13
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud View Post
Most people on this board do not think a FA is worth the money...

Most people on this board are smarter than the avg person and can handle their own affairs with some outside help...

Some people think they do not know enough about investing and other aspects of finance that a FA is well worth the money...
The paradox with finding a good Financial Advisor is this-

If you know enough to be able to identify a good advisor from a bad advisor, then you probably can do it yourself.

If you don't know enough about the market to do it yourself, then you will be challenged to figure out if you have found a good FA or if you are going to get fleeced. It is kinda like sitting down at a poker table with a couple folks who are willing to teach you how to play.

In my corporate 401K account, I have about 30 funds that I can pick from. Here are the three that are usually the basis of a 'three fund portfolio':

S&P 500 Stock Index
Int'l Stock Index
US Bond Index

If you want similar funds from the retail side of Fidelity, these would work:

FSTVX (total market) or FUSVX (S&P 500)
FTIPX (International exUSA)
FSITX (Bonds)

Here is an article that talks about three fund portfolios. You need to figure out what asset allocation makes sense for you. If you want someone to tell you where to start, then use this:

50% FUSVX, 10% FTIPX, 40% FSITX
__________________
Well it's all right, we're heading to the end of the line...
Clone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 12:15 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clone View Post
The paradox with finding a good Financial Advisor is this-

If you know enough to be able to identify a good advisor from a bad advisor, then you probably can do it yourself.
That view is expressed so frequently on the forum that it needs its own name. How about...

The financial advisor quality paradox (FAQP)?
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 12:31 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
flintnational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta Suburb
Posts: 1,499
This is a post I made to a similar question here. I don't know your fee particulars, so this is not exactly right, but the concept is the same. It shows how fees can dramatically affect your spending. It helps explain why most here recommend you manage your own money.

"IMO, fund and management expenses tend to get lost when compared to total returns (particularly in an up market). Here is another way to look at the expenses.

Current structure

Annual management fee 1.8%
Fund fees .5% (I used the low estimate from other posters)
Total annual costs 2.3%

If you are using a firecalc type SWR strategy of about 4% annually, these expenses have to be subtracted. So you are left with 1.7% to spend (4% - 2.3%).

OTOH, if you build a 2 fund portfolio with Vanguard total stock market index admiral shares (VTSAX .04% expense ratio) and Vanguard total bond market index admiral shares (VBTLX .05% expense ratio) your blended expense ratio will be around .045%. This would leave you 3.955% to spend (4% - .045%).

Summary: Current WR less expenses 2.3%
Vanguard WR less expenses 3.955%

The Vanguard structure would increase your net WR by 71% "
__________________
"Oh, twice as much ain't twice as good
And can't sustain like one half could
It's wanting more that's gonna send me to my knees" - John Mayer
flintnational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 12:44 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
kcowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pacific latitude 20/49
Posts: 7,677
Send a message via Skype™ to kcowan
Rather than focusing on %, always calculate the amount of dollars you are paying, both in the fund picker and the funds themselves. Don't forget to include trading fees too.

When I took over MILs portfolio, it was the actual money that got her. It was not worth the lunch and plant at Christmas. I told her that I would gladly take her out and not charge her.

I did charge her to manage it but my fee was less that 30% of what she had been paying. And I gave her a one page statement of how she did in the year, showing my fee. That was a big improvement over the ton of paper that she was getting.
__________________
For the fun of it...Keith
kcowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 01:45 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by flintnational View Post

...
Current structure

Annual management fee 1.8%
...
Who actually charges 1.8%? I know you said it wasn't the OP's actual number, but shouldn't it be a realistic one? The case against management fees doesn't need to be inflated.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 03:05 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
flintnational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta Suburb
Posts: 1,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum View Post
Who actually charges 1.8%? I know you said it wasn't the OP's actual number, but shouldn't it be a realistic one? The case against management fees doesn't need to be inflated.
Example only. This was from a previous thread where the OP was paying the numbers I listed. Follow the link for details. IIRC, it was an annuity with mutual fund sub-accounts. This poster is considering a FA. Many advisors charge 1% plus fund fees. This could get the OP to 1.5% to 2% if they are not careful.
__________________
"Oh, twice as much ain't twice as good
And can't sustain like one half could
It's wanting more that's gonna send me to my knees" - John Mayer
flintnational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 03:32 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by flintnational View Post
Example only. This was from a previous thread where the OP was paying the numbers I listed. Follow the link for details. IIRC, it was an annuity with mutual fund sub-accounts. This poster is considering a FA. Many advisors charge 1% plus fund fees. This could get the OP to 1.5% to 2% if they are not careful.
Wow, so they did pay an 1.8% annual fee, in that other thread. That's so hideous I thought you must've made it up. My apologies.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 03:37 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
I think the 1.8% in the other thread was a 1% account level AUM fee + an estimated 0.8% fund expenses.... vs DIY of less than 0.2%.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Management  Fees smooch FIRE and Money 6 02-13-2005 11:53 AM
No fees on my company's 401k? soupcxan FIRE and Money 3 01-04-2005 06:19 PM
Confused about "low balance" fees... soupcxan FIRE and Money 8 11-21-2004 06:43 PM
E*Trade Lowers Fees Austin_Explorer FIRE and Money 13 09-19-2004 02:53 PM
Investment Manager fees oldcrowcall FIRE and Money 2 04-15-2004 10:08 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.