Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Thoughts on improving a lazy ETF portfolio
Old 08-13-2007, 06:24 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 253
I've been spending some time studying various "lazy portfolios" and one of the ones that seems to test out quite well is Paul Merriman's ETF choices from FundAdvice.com - Suggested Portfolios

I took his recommended balanced ETF portfolio and rebalanced it to 70/30 (versus his balancing of 60/40) to get:

7% each in SPY, VTV, IWC, VBR, VNQ, EFA, EFV, and VWO
14% in DLS
15% in IEF
9% in SHY
6% in TIP

Then I started to think of ways to optimize the individual holdings within each sector. A few ideas there:

1. I don't think I can improve much on the Vipers he chooses, they have a possible tax disadvantage in that they are different classes of VG's regular index funds, but I see that as only a theoretical disadvantage and in any event I feel it is far compensated for by the superior expense ratios sported by the Viper family. Seems like nobody beats VG on cost.

2. I would substitute IVV for SPY. It has a lower expense ratio than SPY, and IVV has an advantage in that they reinvest dividends received from portfolio companies rather than distributing them to the shareholders of the ETF.

3. Instead of purchasing EFA, I would buy VGK / VPL in a 74 / 26 mix (well OK I'd probably buy it 75 / 25). You obtain the same mix that way with lower expenses, at the expense of extra brokerage trade costs.

4. I looked hard at FDM / PZI in place of IWC. But these seem too "actively" managed to me, and in any event IWC has much more liquidity and a lower expense ratio. I'll leave IWC in place.

5. Looked at RWR in place of VNQ, but again VG's lower cost structure wins out for me. They track different REIT indices anyway.

6. Sadly there are no "Government Bond" VIPERS to replace IEF/SHY/TIP with, but each is only 15 bps expenses anyway, so not much to save.

7. The position I'm least comfortable with in the resulting portfolio is DLS. Relatively high expense ratio of 58 bps and its only been out about 14 months. Since Wisdom Tree works off home grown and quasi actively managed indices its not going to be possible to find an exact match. Odd that a "dividend" fund only has a 0.36% yield according to Yahoo finance, but I suspect that the hassle of claiming foreign dividend tax credits would make it painful enough that I'd be happy this fund has a lowish yield. GWX might be an alternative, but its also expensive @ 60 bps and is very new.

Any thoughts to further improve/refine this portfolio?
FinanceGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weighting game: New 'lazy' portfolio using 'fundamental' ETFs sparks furor chinaco FIRE and Money 15 05-05-2007 06:12 PM
SWR - Amortize your portfolio RgrGd FIRE and Money 5 03-28-2007 11:29 AM
ETF only portfolio webbach FIRE and Money 19 12-15-2006 11:37 AM
The FIRE dividend ETF portfolio preben FIRE and Money 6 05-15-2006 02:16 PM
Conservative distribution phase portfolio peteyperson FIRE and Money 13 03-22-2005 07:48 AM


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum
Investing Channel
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0