The issue is stereotyping.
How would you gentlemen feel if I started referring to men, in general, as testosterone-crazed rapists? Would you not feel somewhat offended? You should.
That is as interesting comparison, and a sexist look at our criminal justice system.
This thread and my opinion about a thrifty girls options, compared to a thrifty guys options, is not sexist. If you think it is sexist, you are putting your western opinions over much of the rest of the worlds opinions. If you would say a guy can always work a hard labor construction job, that is just as sexist.
I am sure you will agree with the statistics that women on average, make less than men. Women make only 77% of what a guy makes are some numbers I have heard.
On a random hetero basis, that means that a guy will marry a woman making 23% less money, and a girl will marry a guy making 23% more. Comparing the two people, this girl and the guy from the other thread, the girl stands a better chance of getting a higher level of financial stability by getting married or living with a male. Either way, the girl stands a better chance to improve her condition.
People, both men and women, live with the others for financial stability all the time. If instead of getting a “sugar daddy”, I would have said she can marry a financially stable guy if she needs to, that would somehow be better? Or she can fall in love with a European shipping magnate, become a trophy wife, and live happily ever after, if her financial situation goes awry.
Or I could have said she could get a job and put in 40 hours a week working away her hours… Is that any less being pimped out as a worker for a fortune 500 company than a trophy wife?
People make financial decisions all the time and get involved, get married or not, based on finances. I would guess that most people include or exclude individuals based on some sort of criteria initially.
You could even argue the fact the women live longer than men is a sexist allocation of healthcare resources...
