Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
trapped in an IRA
Old 01-01-2012, 11:07 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,877
trapped in an IRA

Does anyone else feel trapped by their IRA? When IRAs blossomed in the 1980s I did like so many others and annually contributed the max. Though I knew pre-tax IRA funds would be taxed upon withdrawal, years elapsed before I learned those withdrawals would be taxed at ordinary income rates. For many who accumulate via LBYM, rate brackets will not be much lower after FIRE than before.

Had I instead put those contributions into, say, Exxon stock held outside the IRA, where dividends and capital gains are taxed less that ordinary income, I think it would now be worth more after tax than my IRA is. Even better than Exxon would be to buy and hold a growth stock that pays minimal dividends since its capital gains can be deferred indefinitely. Conclusion: unless after FIRE one's ordinary income rate will be less than dividend/CG rates, IRAs are a trap.
GrayHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-01-2012, 11:34 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
hmm, wonder if that's true. Has to be a numbers thing tho...

1) Case A...10K TIRA; assume 25% bracket and 2.5K side tax fund
After N yrs, TIRA doubles to 20K and side fund doubles to 5K;
To get aftertax value at the point ...liquidate both
TIRA becomes 15K and side fund is 5K less (at best) cap gains tax on 2.5K
so total is 20K less CG on 2.5K

2) Case B....10K in taxable; side fund used to pay tax on that income
After N yrs, taxable doubles to 20K. To get aftertax value, liquidate
and that becomes 20K less (at best) cap gains tax on 10K.

Seems like if math is correct (pls check) that case A is still better.
Of course, if the past several yrs tax law continues, you could benefit, perhaps from 0%15% LTCG/QDIV along the way for case B but who knows if that will continue.
kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 11:54 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
What kaneohe says, plus:

Your IRA withdrawals may have the benefit of a better average tax rate than your current marginal tax rate, if you don't have a lot of other income. Some of it comes out within the lower tax brackets. Plus, the growth within the IRA comes tax free even if the marginal tax rates for contributions and withdrawals are the same. It's the same % either going in or coming out, won't matter when you actually paid it. And you even get some inflation creep protection as the tax brackets are adjusted.


That said, I did contribute just enough to receive the company match and placed the rest in a taxable account. Until these last few years when I've been trying to stay in a lower tax bracket to pick up tuition tax credits and Roth contributions. Which I guess may be another benefit of maxing out.
Animorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 12:57 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,877
Hmm, after trying some math, I see if all the IRA contribs are pre-tax then IRA does come out ahead. However, if half the IRA contribs are post-tax, as is roughly true for me and perhaps others, and ordinary rates are the same pre- and post-FIRE, then the numbers end about the same as the outside IRA investment:

1) If all IRA contribs are pre-tax, then all $100k goes into IRA. In 40 years it grows 4x to $400k. Full $400k is subject to 30% tax of $120k, leaving $280k after tax.

2) If half of IRA contribs are after tax dollars, IRA is funded with $50k pre-tax and $35k after-tax, $85k total. In 40 years it grows 4x to $340k. $305k is subject to 30% tax of $91.5k; $340k-$91.5k leaves $248.5k after tax.

3) Instead, keep same $100k outside IRA, pay the 30% tax, leaving $70k for a buy-and-hold stock investment. In 40 years it grows to $280k. Gain is $210k, pay 15% CG tax of $31.5k, leaving $248.5k after tax.

Since scenario #2 and #3 result in about the same, #3 is interesting since it has no RMDs. OK, so an IRA is not quite the trap I thought it was, but it's interesting to see a buy-and-hold approach like #3 can be competitive.
GrayHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 01:02 PM   #5
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayHare View Post
Does anyone else feel trapped by their IRA? When IRAs blossomed in the 1980s I did like so many others and annually contributed the max. Though I knew pre-tax IRA funds would be taxed upon withdrawal, years elapsed before I learned those withdrawals would be taxed at ordinary income rates. For many who accumulate via LBYM, rate brackets will not be much lower after FIRE than before.

Had I instead put those contributions into, say, Exxon stock held outside the IRA, where dividends and capital gains are taxed less that ordinary income, I think it would now be worth more after tax than my IRA is. Even better than Exxon would be to buy and hold a growth stock that pays minimal dividends since its capital gains can be deferred indefinitely. Conclusion: unless after FIRE one's ordinary income rate will be less than dividend/CG rates, IRAs are a trap.

You are absolutely correct. I realized this back in 1980-1981 when everyone had gone gung-ho over IRAs and annuities before they read the fine print. Of course it helped that I was in the business of selling annuities. What helped me to realize what a trap taxable IRAs and annuities are is that my parents (frugal people who taught school all their lives and had their savings boosted by an inheritance from my grandfather) had just retired, but their tax brackets did not go down because their combined social security income, retirement pensions, and investment income were higher than in their working years. That is the reward the government gives us for being frugal. So, why invest in an IRA that defers taxes until you are in a higher tax bracket, and then forces you to pay taxes on the interest, dividend and capital gains income it produced at the highest possible rate?

As middle class Americans, the two biggest REAL tax breaks the government gives us are: 1) a much lower income tax on capital gains, and 2) the step-up basis for capital gains when one dies. Apparently the moral of the tax code is to buy stocks and real estate in your own name and hold them as long as possible, preferably until after you die.

The consolation in your case is that you have saved this money, not pissed it away like many others have done. That is something to be very grateful for, so continue to read widely so that you will not be caught in another government trap. I sure wish I had saved more!!
james7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 01:15 PM   #6
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
It is impossible to know in advance the math needed to make the most financially advantageous choice. At the time income was earned, minimizing tax had a high priority. Now, time to pay, that priority has been replaced by another.

There are other advantages to tax deferred accounts, as some investment only make sense when tax deferred, such as commodity funds and REITS. As one who had no tax deferred options, I see no trap, just the need to live with the choices made.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 01:24 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Koolau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leeward Oahu
Posts: 17,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by james7 View Post

As middle class Americans, the two biggest REAL tax breaks the government gives us are: 1) a much lower income tax on capital gains, and 2) the step-up basis for capital gains when one dies. Apparently the moral of the tax code is to buy stocks and real estate in your own name and hold them as long as possible, preferably until after you die.
I would add 3) The ROTH IRA. If I had it to do over, I would have placed much less in tIRAs and 401(k) and put more in taxable accounts instead. I would have maxed out my ROTH contributions as well. Now, in my dotage, I must carefully figure out which pot of money to pull funds from to keep my current AND future taxable income within manageable limits. I'm sure a case can be made for the benefits of tIRAs/401(k) but it isn't as simple as "put all you can into these vehicles". It ain't that simple for most of us. I look at these vehicles as overeating a favorite food. It sure tastes good going down, but...
__________________
Ko'olau's Law -

Anything which can be used can be misused. Anything which can be misused will be.
Koolau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 01:34 PM   #8
Recycles dryer sheets
Sirka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Georgia
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayHare View Post
Does anyone else feel trapped by their IRA?

IRAs are a trap.
I don't feel trapped, I just live with the decision I made when I was in a high tax bracket. By putting some of the 'IRS' money into Stock Funds, I had a chance, over the early years, to learn about risk and loosing $$. IRA is IMHO a promise to IRS that you will pay tax on the money, that's left - if any!
We continue to convert to Roth by transferring the stocks, some times at a big discount (2009). So right now we can chose when to pay Uncle Sam...
__________________
Hard to say what it was, when it isn't.
FIRED in 2005 @ 55
Sirka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 01:35 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by james7 View Post
What helped me to realize what a trap taxable IRAs and annuities are is that my parents (frugal people who taught school all their lives and had their savings boosted by an inheritance from my grandfather) had just retired, but their tax brackets did not go down because their retirement pensions and investment income were higher than in their working years.
I don't see any 'trap' here nor do I see any grounds for a complaint. Hard for me to find a problem with having a higher income in retirement than when I was working.

401k's converted to IRAs were our tickets to FIRE. We paid off the mortgage and live debt free to minimize our needed income and associated taxes. We've dropped to a lower bracket in retirement so it is working well for us.

As MichaelB said, you have to plan, manage and live with the choices made.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 02:15 PM   #10
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
I don't see any 'trap' here nor do I see any grounds for a complaint. Hard for me to find a problem with having a higher income in retirement than when I was working.
As MichaelB said, you have to plan, manage and live with the choices made.
Aw, man, then it's no fun to complain about The Man and the IRS...

And congratulations on your 24,000th post! Can we get the moderators over here with the brass band and the gift cards?
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 02:23 PM   #11
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords View Post
And congratulations on your 24,000th post! Can we get the moderators over here with the brass band and the gift cards?
Are you just saying that to make sure that you get one as well?
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 02:35 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,877
If the TIRA contains after-tax contribs, at least Roth conversion provides something of an escape hatch.

As part of FIRE planning, this issue is worthy of attention by those still in the accumulation phase. Unless converted to Roth, after tax contribs to an IRA can be a losing proposition.
GrayHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 02:38 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
easysurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,132
I don't feel trapped. On the otherhand, what if I had not contributed to an IRA and put the money in a company like "Enron"?
__________________
Have you ever seen a headstone with these words
"If only I had spent more time at work" ... from "Busy Man" sung by Billy Ray Cyrus
easysurfer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 02:47 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
I don't see the issue with the IRA as long as you understand it and organize your retirement income in a sensible way wrt taxation. In my case last year I paid 16% tax and in ER I expect that to go down to 10%. The big question is whether to do IRA to ROTH conversions to limit RMDs and the tax bill when they start.
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 03:23 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
If one retires early with a large after-tax account and a large IRA, then they can live off the taxable account and pay virtually no taxes while converting the large IRA to a Roth IRA piecemeal without paying any taxes on it. That is, the contributions were tax-free and the conversions are tax-free as well. It is one of the biggest tax breaks out there and by no means a trap.

Now it is true that one probably should not have made after-tax contributions to an IRA in the old days. Nowadays, there may be a good reason to do so, namely the so-called 'backdoor' Roth IRA if one's income is too high to make straight contributions to a Roth IRA.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 03:31 PM   #16
Recycles dryer sheets
Beryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 413
No trapped feelings here. Nearly 50% of my net worth is in IRA accounts and I'm thankful that I was able defer the tax. I also plan to convert to ROTH accounts when it makes sense.
__________________
Retired - Class of 2011
Beryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 05:24 PM   #17
Full time employment: Posting here.
ESRwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 889
I feel very confident that my tax bracket will not be any lower in retirement than it is now. So, although I have always put in more than enough to get all of my employer's 401k match, I have never completely maxed out my 401k contributions. I have maxed out my Roth IRA every year.

I basically use my 401k to get the free match, and as a great place to allocate money to bonds. My 401k is entirely in the Vanguard Total Bond Market index. I don't really see a point in putting stocks into my 401k.

In my taxable account I am all stock funds, individual stocks, and cash. I like having the flexibility of my accounts versus what I can access in my 401k. I also like having access to the dividend income. I pretty much always re-invest the dividends and capital gains, but not always. The flexibility to do exactly what I want, whenever I want, with this money is worth paying 15% taxes on it.

Also, if you use "tax loss harvesting", which I do sometimes, then you can really cut down on the taxes. I have about a $20k tax loss leftover still from the downturn.
ESRwannabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 06:16 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayHare View Post
If the TIRA contains after-tax contribs, at least Roth conversion provides something of an escape hatch.

As part of FIRE planning, this issue is worthy of attention by those still in the accumulation phase. Unless converted to Roth, after tax contribs to an IRA can be a losing proposition.
agree w/ your last statement...the worst of both worlds...no deduction going in and ordinary rates coming out(for earnings). You might want model the Roth conversion w/ your 50-50 mix of deductible/non-ded.

Also you might want to model your non-deductible contribution(and Roth conversion) in two ways: 1) reduced as you did by the taxes (limited resources) and
2) the full amount not reduced by taxes with taxes paid by a side fund.("infinite" resources)
Not sure how it works out for the non-deductible contribution but for a regular Roth contribution (if you were eligible), the conclusions are different
for a partial contribtion (balance to taxes) and a full contribution (taxes paid by side fund because the Roth is "bigger" when you have other resources to pay the taxes.
kaneohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 06:21 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
It might be interesting to have a poll to figure out how common non-deductible traditional IRA contributions are for folks on this forum.

I will say that I started an IRA with non-deductible contributions. At the time, there was no such thing as a Roth IRA and I was not eligible for any deductible IRA contribution. I only contributed for 4 years when IRA limits were low and the account has only quadrupled in size, so not a very big amount of money. Nevertheless, it will get converted to a Roth at the 0% tax rate along with the rest of my tax-deferred assets.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 07:23 PM   #20
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,056
By the time we had decided to stay in the USA our income was already too high for deductible IRA's.

When we ER'ed a couple of years ago our tax rate was 13% lower than it had been so I converted my IRA to a ROTH.

DW also has a SEP-IRA plus a roll-over IRA from her old company that she left in 2004. As such she can't convert just the tIRA to a ROTH. We'll continue to do ROTH conversions each year to fill up the 15% tax bracket while we can.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Backdoor Roth IRA contributions still allowed in 2012, right? soupcxan FIRE and Money 35 02-12-2012 10:52 PM
IRA Withdraw or Other Funds First? marko FIRE and Money 16 09-25-2011 01:54 PM
Convert 401k funds to a non-taxed IRA? nico08 FIRE and Money 7 08-21-2011 01:20 PM
Early Withdrawals from IRA? Willing to pay the 5%? njonge01 FIRE and Money 9 07-29-2011 07:38 PM
Ally Bank now has TIRA & Roth IRA CD's veremchuka FIRE and Money 0 06-24-2011 04:51 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.