Not a political post just wondering what others think of his plan. To me sounds almost too good to be true and I don't see how it wold generate enough revenue to cover government spending, short term or long term. It is still lacking some specifics as to what loopholes would be closed and deductions eliminated.
What say you oh wise sages of the forum ?
Normal is an illusion...what is normal for the spider is chaos for the fly.
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
Seems to me like the same supply side plan tried by "W" and Kansas. In theory, lower the rates and the economy surges to make up for all the lost revenue. It's never actually worked before. Seems like the deficit has gone down & economy done better under Clinton/Obama when rates were raised. Pretty easy to see who the winners will be when the top rate is reduced to 25%, estate taxes eliminated, corporate taxes reduced to 15% and "unspecified deductions/loopholes" are never changed.
Setting up a structure to keep manufacturing here (or to return home) seems like a no brainer to me. The problem with any proposal however, is getting them through congress without being derailed by the other party.
Doing things today that others won't, to do things tomorrow that others can't. Of course I'm referring to workouts, not robbing banks.
So if I dare to mention that similar plans of reducing taxes on the wealthy and thus increasing growth (like our old friend trickle down economics, aka voodoo economics) have not exactly been borne out in practice will I get this thread shut down immediately?
This community was started in 2002 as an alternative to a then fee only Motley Fool. The focus of the discussions is on topics related to early retirement and financial independence. The community is moderated to ensure a pleasant experience for our members.