Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Trying to understand 'investment income'
Old 02-17-2017, 10:09 AM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
Trying to understand 'investment income'

I didn't want to hijack the discussion in the "Help me with stock dividends" thread so I'm posting my question about investment income here. My situation is that almost all our retirement savings is in a tIRA - Wellington and Wellesley funds. Below are the payouts at the end of December. My question is this: which of the payouts below can I receive as 'income'? Is it just the dividends? Or are LT and ST cap gains also considered 'income' and are spendable? (If so, how do you receive cap gains?)

I'm trying to get an idea of how much annual income I might receive from our tIRA when we retire.

Thank you.


12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Long-term capital gain 152.136 $67.76 $10,308.71
12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Short-term capital gain 17.016 $67.76 $1,153.03
12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Dividend Received 64.444 $67.76 $4,366.72
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Long-term capital gain 24.641 $61.67 $1,519.61
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Short-term capital gain 0.895 $61.67 $55.18
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Dividend Received 21.859 $61.67 $1,348.02
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-17-2017, 10:13 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
If I'm understanding your question correctly, you don't have to worry about any of that. If it's in a tIRA, then when you withdraw any money it will be taxed at your regular tax rate. What happens inside the IRA doesn't matter. When you withdraw it it's all basically cash.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 10:22 AM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley View Post
If I'm understanding your question correctly, you don't have to worry about any of that. If it's in a tIRA, then when you withdraw any money it will be taxed at your regular tax rate. What happens inside the IRA doesn't matter. When you withdraw it it's all basically cash.
What I'm wondering is if I change the setting on my tIRA to 'receive dividends' (instead of reinvesting them), will I only receive the dividend amounts ($4366 + $1348) shown in my post above? If so, is there a way to receive CGs as income (without selling shares) or do they automatically get reinvested?
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 10:28 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem View Post
What I'm wondering is if I change the setting on my tIRA to 'receive dividends' (instead of reinvesting them), will I only receive the dividend amounts ($4366 + $1348) shown in my post above? If so, is there a way to receive CGs as income (without selling shares) or do they automatically get reinvested?
Since presumably these funds are held in a brokerage account, if you can't find an answer to your question on the broker's website, ask the broker. Also you could let the payouts get reinvested and then whenever you want just sell some shares to exactly meet your cash needs. If it is in a TIRA, I can't think why you might want to avoid selling shares. But I am not a large mutual fund investor, and my TIRA is small, so maybe there is a reason that someone else or you can explain.

Ha
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 10:35 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Basically, you get 4 kinds of "income" from a mutual fund... dividends, short-term capital gain distributions, long-term capital gain distributions and appreciation.

Let's use Wellington (Admiral - VWENX) for 2016 as an example.. and use 1 share.

On 12/31/2015, a share of Wellington was worth $63.54 and on 12/31/2016 a share was worth $67.45. In addition, during 2016, Wellington paid $1.782 per share of dividends, and in December 2016 paid a $0.1278 short-term capital gain distribution and a $1.1426 long-term capital gain distribution.

So if you owned 1 share of Wellington in 2016, you would have received $3.0524 of distrbutions.. plus the share appreciated $3.91. I think most people would say that you had $3.0524 of "income" and $6.9624 of total return.

In your case, since you hold it in a tax-deferred IRA, none of it is income for tax purposes unless you withdraw it... for example, if you have your IRA set up to take dividends and capital gain distributions in cash then your income for tax purposes would be $3.0534... but if you reinvest distributions then your taxable income would be nil (assuming no other withdrawals).

OTOH, if you hold the share in a taxable account, then your taxable income would be $3.0534 whether you take the distributions in cash or reinvest them.

I hope this isn't too confusing.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 10:37 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
exnavynuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Acworth
Posts: 1,214
Vanguard's article here I think covers your questions https://personal.vanguard.com/us/ins...plained-112015
exnavynuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 11:03 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
Others have answered the different types of gains that something like Wellesley and Wellington distributes and their level. When saving for retirement most people will reinvest all those distributions. However, when retired lots of folks choose not to reinvest and they have the gains deposited into a cash account and spend it. If you use a money market account inside a tIRA you'll pay income tax on the withdrawals. If the funds are in a regular brokerage account you'll pay dividend and capital gains tax.
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 12:41 PM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
Thank you for the replies. So my VG tIRA produced an approx total of $18,750 in retirement income for Q4/2016 using the numbers I posted originally, right?

12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Long-term capital gain $10,308.71
12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Short-term capital gain $1,153.03
12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Dividend Received $4,366.72

12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Long-term capital gain $1,519.61
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Short-term capital gain $55.18
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Dividend Received $1,348.02


And based on the feedback, it sounds like this is money that I can choose to receive in cash (versus having it reinvesting), correct?

I realize there are differences in tax consequences but I'm not focused on that right now. I just want to get some idea of what my annual retirement income might be for planning purposes.
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 12:55 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
You're still missing the point. Your retirement income is whatever you take out of your investments, which in this case is your IRA. With each individual MF in the IRA you can specify whether you want the dividends/interest/capital gains reinvested or not. It's (probably) not a setting on your IRA, it's a setting on the individual MF. If what you are looking for is how much your investments will pay off each year to create a bucket of cash you can withdraw without selling any shares, then yes, it was your $18K last quarter. But it's not going to be automatically paid out to you from the IRA, it's going to sit in (probably) a MM account in your IRA. You will then have to withdraw it, all or part, before you will have it to spend.


If you want to use the amount of dividends/interest/capital gains you get as your income, that's fine. But it doesn't have to be. It's all your choice.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:04 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley View Post
You're still missing the point. Your retirement income is whatever you take out of your investments, which in this case is your IRA...

If you want to use the amount of dividends/interest/capital gains you get as your income, that's fine. But it doesn't have to be. It's all your choice.
+1

If you take out the whole enchilada in one year and pay tax on it, that's your income. Or it can be zero.

If one needs to know what the sustainable investment income is, then the question is about investment gain. He can take the portfolio value at year end, subtract from it the beginning value AND also an amount equal to the inflation. That portfolio growth is your investment gain for that year, whether anything is reinvested or not is immaterial.

The problem is that this "gain" varies from year to year, and can and did turn into huge losses some years. So, what is then the average? Hah, now that's something nobody knows, because we know what it was in the past, but not what it will be in the future.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:06 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
harley is right... you're still missing the point. While the distributions that you received were ~$18,750... in addition, in both the case of Wellesley and Wellington the shares appreciated (value the end of they year was higher than at the beginning of the year by more than the $18,750 of distributions received. While appreciation is typically lumpier than distributions, it can easily be monetized and used for living expenses by just selling a few shares and distributing the proceeds.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Trying to understand 'investment income'
Old 02-17-2017, 01:13 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
RetireAge50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,659
Trying to understand 'investment income'

The capital gains are not relevant in an IRA so if you want to live off the dividends only use that number. Otherwise just tell them to send you more money, the capital gains mean nothing so pick any amount.
RetireAge50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:20 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem View Post
I realize there are differences in tax consequences but I'm not focused on that right now. I just want to get some idea of what my annual retirement income might be for planning purposes.
As I mentioned, the OP was really thinking about what he could sustainably draw from his IRA, although he needs to realize also that there's no tax difference anyway.

One withdraws $10K, he pays whatever tax on that $10K, no matter if that $10K comes from dividends, capital gains, or principal.

His stash shrinks by 50% in that year, and the MFs pay no dividends, he draws $10K, he pays tax on $10K.

If it is from a taxable or after-tax account, not an IRA, then one does consider different tax treatments.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:21 PM   #14
Full time employment: Posting here.
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
Okay, I think I finally get it. Sorry for being so dunce about this stuff. Thank you all for your patience and your help.
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:22 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
This has probably been stated a million times, but I don't see it coming through here:

If you have a $500,000 IRA holding W & W and they pay out $18,750 in a single day that you have sent to your checking account, then you will have $18,750 in your checking account and $481,250 in your IRA. Your IRA will NOT be valued at $500,000 at the end of that day.

Here is something else:

If you have a $500,000 IRA holding W & W and they don't pay out anything in a single day, but you sell $18,750 worth of shares and send the $18,750 to your checking account, then you will have $18,750 in your checking account and $481,250 in your IRA. Your IRA will NOT be valued at $500,000 at the end of that day.

My point is that it is TOTALLY MEANINGLESS to think of INCOME or DIVIDENDS or CAPITAL GAINS DISTRIBUTIONS coming out of a mutual fund. Any total value of your shares includes embedded value for income, dividends, and capital gains distributions, so when money comes out, the value of your holding is less. You can call it income, dividends, and/or capital gains, but you can also call it plain old money.

One's annual retirement income can be anything they want it to be from a pair of funds like W & W: just take money out until one runs out of money.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:23 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
^^^^ well put
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:46 PM   #17
Full time employment: Posting here.
Carpediem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
This has probably been stated a million times, but I don't see it coming through here:.....
Thank you!
Carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:50 PM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
There's a reason some people think of dividends as being different than cap gain distributions. In their mind, they think of this analogy.

I have a chicken, and it lays an egg for me. If I only eat the egg and do not harm the chicken, I can eat eggs forever.

The problem is that they forget that the chicken will die off some day, the same as some companies do and did die off.

A mutual fund or even an index fund has more than one stock, and it invests in new stocks to replace the old ones that die off. So, it's not just one chicken, but a flock of them. Some hens are young and have not laid eggs yet, and some are productive hens but are on the way down. Hopefully, they will take turn and produce a constant amount of eggs.

But even if one just eats eggs and no chicken wings, the egg production is not steady but ebbs and flows. Once in a while, a bird flu arrives and wipes out many hens. Your egg production is down, your number of hens is down. It takes time to rebuild the flock when that happens. You need to stop eating eggs, and hatch them for replacement.

Some people raise chicken for meat in addition to eggs. So, they raise a breed that is not intended for egg production but grows fast. If they successfully hatch and raise more chicken, there's nothing wrong with eating chicken meat (selling shares), if their flock after culling stays the same size as that of the egg farmer.

And so, investment income can be eggs, or chicken meat. It depends on what breed of chicken one raises, and most people have both.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:53 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpediem View Post
Thank you for the replies. So my VG tIRA produced an approx total of $18,750 in retirement income for Q4/2016 using the numbers I posted originally, right?

12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Long-term capital gain $10,308.71
12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Short-term capital gain $1,153.03
12/23/2016 Wellington Fund Admiral Dividend Received $4,366.72

12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Long-term capital gain $1,519.61
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Short-term capital gain $55.18
12/23/2016 Wellesley Income Fund Adm Dividend Received $1,348.02


And based on the feedback, it sounds like this is money that I can choose to receive in cash (versus having it reinvesting), correct?

I realize there are differences in tax consequences but I'm not focused on that right now. I just want to get some idea of what my annual retirement income might be for planning purposes.
All you really need to know is that a balanced fund like Wellesley or Wellington will probably allow you to safely withdraw an index linked 4% of it's value every year for a 30 year retirement.....that 4% is your income whether it comes from dividends, capital gains distributions or sale of shares. You can take out any amount that you like, but that 4% a year is a good start for a retirement income.
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 02:14 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Good point... the OP could just put their tIRA into W or W or both, set up an automatic monthly redemption that goes to their local bank account equal to 3% (or even 4%) of the beginning value divided by 12 months and go off and have fun... and just adjust with automatic withdrawal annually thereafter for inflation.

Actually, I haven't found it necessary to adjust my withdrawals for inflation so an annual adjustment would be optional IME.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trying to understand a withdrawal plan. Badger FIRE and Money 25 12-06-2010 12:06 AM
Trying to Understand Seller's Financing (for a house) wilkens21 FIRE and Money 8 06-20-2009 05:36 AM
Trying to Understand???? scoopsteve FIRE and Money 35 02-19-2006 03:30 PM
CONFUSED BUT TRYING TO UNDERSTAND AJL FIRE and Money 26 10-07-2005 12:57 PM
Desparately Trying To Understand SWR? ShokWaveRider FIRE and Money 48 08-24-2004 01:05 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.