Umbrella insurance levels while ER ?

Delawaredave

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
184
Hope this is right category for post.

Are umbrella policies strongly recommended while ER ? What levels ?

While in ER, portfolio is only "income generating" vehicle - seems important to protect it against lawsuits/judgements.

Any umbrella insurance companies recommended ? I've only found that companies will write umbrella policies if they have both your home/auto already.

Thanks for any thoughts !
Delawaredave
 
Delawaredave said:
Hope this is  right category for post.

Are umbrella policies strongly recommended while ER ?  What levels ?

While in ER, portfolio is only "income generating" vehicle - seems important to protect it against lawsuits/judgements.

Any umbrella insurance companies recommended ?  I've only found that companies will write umbrella policies if they have both your home/auto already.

Thanks for any thoughts !
Delawaredave

We don't have one, although I've looked into it as I can see some
gaps in our coverage. Re. your statement that "companies will only
write umbrella policies if they have both your home/auto, etc"
I do not believe this is true.

JG
 
I would regard it as foolish not to carry a substantial umbrella policy, esoecially once you are FIREd. Umbrella insurance is cheap; spend a few hundred bucks a year. $1MM is a minimum, IMO.
 
MRGALT2U said:
I do not believe this is true.

Then you'd be pretty much wrong again ;)

Umbrella policies are written by insurers, almost universally as an "umbrella" over existing home and auto policies. While one can get a separate liability only policy from the same or a separate insurer from their existing policies, you'd be an idiot to not take the far cheaper umbrella policy from your standing insurer.

The cost is low.

We're the sort of people that hucksters look for. Plenty of fairly liquid assets.

You should carry a minimum of a million, or whatever the average legal payout for the average liability claim in your area is...whichever is higher. Consider carrying an amount equal to your liquid net worth, including your home.

We have $2M in coverage. I'd have to go look for the exact number but it costs about $200 a year on top of about $200 extra a year total over our house and three cars as you have to carry a minimum liability on your home and cars thats higher than what most people carry.

I figure if I do something that a fair and impartial jury of my peers say is worth more than $2M and the insurance companies lawyer cant get that reduced, I deserve to open up the checkbook.
 
I'll second CFB, right down to paying about $200/year for a $2M policy.

(Cute Fuzzy Bunny) said:
I figure if I do something that a fair and impartial jury of my peers say is worth more than $2M and the insurance companies lawyer cant get that reduced, I deserve to open up the checkbook.

I wonder if there's ever a case where they decide it's not going to go below $2M, and there's no point for them to negotiate down from, say, $5M to $2M, because their liability is maxed out anyway... that would hurt.

SC
 
I have a $1 million dollar umbrella but will probably increase it to $2m.
 
sc said:
I'll second CFB, right down to paying about $200/year for a $2M policy.

I wonder if there's ever a case where they decide it's not going to go below $2M, and there's no point for them to negotiate down from, say, $5M to $2M, because their liability is maxed out anyway... that would hurt.

They're going to try hard to not have the case go to court at all, and if it does, to have it thrown out or be below $2m. To the extent that they fail, either you had bad luck and got a bad judge and/or jury or you really screwed up.
 
(Cute Fuzzy Bunny) said:
They're going to try hard to not have the case go to court at all, and if it does, to have it thrown out or be below $2m. To the extent that they fail, either you had bad luck and got a bad judge and/or jury or you really screwed up.

Now that you mention it, I recall at the time thinking that having the insurance company's lawyers on my side in such a case might be worth the premium all by itself.

Although, I've seen studies showing that in states where judges are elected, there's often a large bias towards the lawyer who gave more money to that judges campaign... maybe I should look at which insurance company is more generous with their donations?

SC
 
I've got one, and I know a fair number of others that do, but I've never heard of anyone that has had to cash in. Anybody got any first hand experiences to report?
 
I have thought about getting an umbrella policy but do not have one. Mainly because I am a renter, and I do not have renter's insurance, and I think this would be required. I could replace my household items with one paycheck, so I don't see a need to insure them. There is some diminishing risk of fire damage, if I did something negligent, but I could write a check for that low probability event, too (my building is mostly concrete). But I am concerned about the big liability events.

As an apartment dweller, I have no yard, etc., and I am not self-employed, and so almost all my risk of being sued (95%+) for a big liability event is something happening while I am driving. I raised my auto liability limits to the max, $500K total but it is only $250K per person. I asked and I can't get them raised more.

Any renters with umbrella insurance? Do you also have renter's insurance? I would be willing to switch to an auto insurance company that had higher limits, if anyone knows of one. . . I looked at Geico and their max coverage was only $300K per accident. Ideally, I would like to have $2M of coverage.

Kramer
 
>Any renters with umbrella insurance? Do you also have renter's insurance? I would be willing to switch to an auto insurance company that had higher limits, if anyone knows of one. . .

We are renters, have renter's insurance, and an umbrella policy of $1M. Will up it to $2M on renewal. Underwriter is Chubb. Total cost for both policies here in NYC is $1000 per year.
 
I am in Ohio and I pay $386 per year for a 1 million umbrella, I am required to have 300k auto and 300k liability before I could buy the umbrella.

They all are with the same company
 
NYCguy,

Sounds like you need a good independent broker. Have martinis Network with some of your cosmopolitan contemporaries. Somone in your situation will likely have a recommendation.
 
JPatrick said:
I've got one, and I know a fair number of others that do, but I've never heard of anyone that has had to cash in. Anybody got any first hand experiences to report?

My parents have been sued at least 3 times for a million or better stemming from auto accidents. Even though only one case resulted in a settlement for the paintiff (of about $50k), they were very glad to have a high limit umbrella policy.
 
Brewer...what do you think caused the "paintiff"s (sorry, thats a fun mis-spell) going after them...transparency of funds? Did they get an investigator to find out if your parents had money?

What I'm getting at, aside from the umbrella, is there a strategy or method for hiding or improving transparency that you're "sue-able". Does putting the money in a trust, or some specific investment vehicle make it harder for an investigator to find?
 
If someone knew you had an umbrella policy, would he/she be more or less likely to sue?
 
When I moved from Maryland to Virginia my $1m umbrella policy went down from over $300 to $120 per year. It is with Allstate as are home and auto policies.

Grumpy
 
TromboneAl said:
If someone knew you had an umbrella policy, would he/she be more or less likely to sue?

I'm thinking if they have a pretty good case, moreso. If its a skimpy ambulance chaser deal they're hoping for an out of court settlement on, maybe less so? On the other hand, an insurer might just pay out a small claim to avoid the hassle.

One of my ex's had an open house when she was selling her home. Young girl 'tripped over a crack' in her rear patio and fell, causing a requested 50k worth of injury and personal sufferage. Her insurance company paid 25k without batting an eye. Then her premiums went up 20%.
 
A guy I work with hit a little girl with his car about 5 months ago. He had the max auto insurance but no umbrella policy. They reached a settlement out of court, but he had to get his own lawyers and take a new mortgage out on his paid off house.

I felt really bad for the guy, he doesn't make much money and has been trying to save for retirement.

I carry $1 million but I'd like to up it to $2 million. The insurance company seemed to think $2 million was too high of coverage. They would only cover me for 1/2 million for the first three years. Once they saw I didn't have any outstanding legal battles they allowed me to up it to $1 million. I'm with MetLife.

-helen
 
TromboneAl said:
If someone knew you had an umbrella policy, would he/she be more or less likely to sue?

Precisely, I have often wondered that.  If you raise the amount of the umbrella policy above the "Standard" $1M are you advertising that you have something to lose?

I was listening to the "lawyer's hour" on our local radio station recently and he was expressing his opinion that people should be insured up to the level of their net worth, and that if they were, a plaintiff should not be allowed to receive damages higher than the insured amount.  For ERs this would be the ideal scenario - I doubt it'll happen though.  

jj
 
I could only get 1M umbrella insurance since I have teenage boys living in my household and on my auto insurance policy. And they charged me $501 a year (California maybe a factor). Without my boys on the policy, I would have been able to get 2M. I'm assuming that the price will drop once my kids have their own insurance.

Actually a lot of my insurance costs will drop once my kids are independant ;)
 
For those of you having trouble getting higher umbrella limits, try GEICO/Berkshire Hathaway. They seem to be very willing to wriite high policy limits (quoted me up to 10MM right on the phone). I also recall that Berkshire was writing additional umbrella coverage where they would double your coverage for 90% of what your "first" umbrella policy premium was.
 
(Cute Fuzzy Bunny) said:
Brewer...what do you think caused the "paintiff"s (sorry, thats a fun mis-spell) going after them...transparency of funds?  Did they get an investigator to find out if your parents had money?

What I'm getting at, aside from the umbrella, is there a strategy or method for hiding or improving transparency that you're "sue-able".  Does putting the money in a trust, or some specific investment vehicle make it harder for an investigator to find?

Not sure. They don't live large or have a lot of obvious wealth. For example, Dad like to buy older cars ("sleds", IMO) and drive them into the ground. In the past 10 years, he has had a 1985 Caddy, a 1987 Olds, a 1983 Buick Electra Wagon, a 1983 Suburban, and now has an early 90s F150 (for fishing, etc.) and a 1999 retired cop car that he gought with 90k on it and is up to about 140k. He wears very casual clothes (overalls that he doesn't bother to button the sides of are a favorite). You get the picture.

I suspect that a lot of the reason is that the accidents were in NYC and NJ, where litigation seems to be a way of life. As a resident of the Garden State ("Most corrupt politicians in the union"), I am seriously thinking about bumping my umbrella up from 1MM.
 
Huh...you'd think they'd not get a second glance for a lawsuit.

I figured I was buying myself something by dressing down and not driving fancy cars. Maybe not.
 
Back
Top Bottom