Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unable to Scrape by on 250K+ a Year
Old 09-24-2010, 03:05 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 281
Unable to Scrape by on 250K+ a Year

Advice for the Poor Rich: Everybody Hates Todd Henderson

advice-for-the-poor-rich: Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance

Any other suggestions for woe-is-me Todd? He is a lawyer, his wife is a doctor and they can't seem to make ends meet. They pay $100K in state and federal taxes but don't have the money to hire "fancy accountants."

Advice from the Wall Street Journal columnist:

"Never, ever, ever again blog about how hard it is to live on $300,000 or $350,000 a year at a time when one middle-aged man in four can't find a full-time job, and one in five can't find any job at all."
TooFrugal is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 09-24-2010, 03:28 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
I don't find this surprising. The delusions maintained by nearly all of the moderately rich (whom I'll describe as folks earning low seven to mid six figures) that I know are legendary. They truly live in an alternate universe completely divorced from any perspective. It is a world where nannies, and gardeners, and private school, and six thousand square foot homes are all necessities, and the norm. No matter how much they make, they find ways to spend it and so don't feel rich.

They all felt tremendously bad for themselves, and terribly victimized, two years ago when proposals were circulating to limit banker pay. "How will I live on $400,000 per year? Don't they know the cost of living in NYC is higher than elsewhere?" To which, I asked, how do you think your secretary does it? Stunned silence. Apparently they never considered that most people live on a tenth of the amount they were complaining over. Nothing has changed.
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 04:33 PM   #3
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 45
from the guy's blog.

Quote:
if our taxes rise significantly, as they seem likely to, we can cut back on some things. The (legal) immigrant from Mexico who owns the lawn service we employ will suffer, as will the (legal) immigrant from Poland who cleans our house a few times a month. We can cancel our cell phones and some cable channels, as well as take our daughter from her art class at the community art center, but these are only a few hundred dollars per month in total.
Wow, I feel kind of bad for piling on, but, wow. Gee, "only" a few hundred dollars!?
oneils is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 04:41 PM   #4
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
This has been an amazing debate. It's hard to feel sorry for the guy once you read the blog entry and response by DeLong.

The original post can be read here We are the Super Rich « Truth on the Market

A series of responses were written by Brad DeLong and can be read here Grasping Reality with Both Hands
MichaelB is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 04:50 PM   #5
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 886
What a hoot of a blog.

He is a freaking law professor. I'm a lawyer married to a doctor and I worked to learn the tax code inside out. He buys a house with a $15,000 annual tax bill but still sends his kids to private schools
If you have massive educational debt you have to defer something. Kids or the big house

Sheesh
Emeritus is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:08 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,323
Advice from the Wall Street Journal columnist:

"Never, ever, ever again blog about how hard it is to live on $300,000 or $350,000 a year at a time when one middle-aged man in four can't find a full-time job, and one in five can't find any job at all."


No kidding.
__________________
Please consider adopting a rescue animal. So very many need a furr-ever home and someone to love them! And if we all spay/neuter our pets there won't be an overpopulation to put to death.
Orchidflower is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:23 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA suburbs
Posts: 1,796
Nothing is new in this world. As in Marie Antoinette and "Let them eat cake".
WhoDaresWins is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:31 PM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 880
Hmmm...I guess I picked up more on the comments about cutting back on the people they employ to keep their home running while they work (lawn care, cleaning) and services used (cable, cell phone). The trickle down effect that could lead to more unemployment.
Dog is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:39 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
MasterBlaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,391
The way some of you post, you'd confuse a couple of working professionals for billionaires.

Sure they have a little more disposable income, but on the right and left coast they pay very high taxes and housing costs. And someone has to watch the kids while they work. Childcare ain't cheap on the coasts. There just isn't as much left over as you would think after the costs of working are deducted.

So in my book $250k isn't rich by a long shot. Maybe in Peoria that's "the good life". But on the coasts they are still squarely middle class.

For those of you who want to "Tax the Rich" I would say that you are next to be taxed. Be careful what you ask for.
MasterBlaster is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:50 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterBlaster View Post
Sure they have a little more disposable income, but on the right and left coast they pay very high taxes and housing costs. And someone has to watch the kids while they work. Childcare ain't cheap on the coasts. There just isn't as much left over as you would think after the costs of working are deducted.
Median household income in Manhattan is $47,000. So by "a little more disposable income" you mean $100K or so a year.
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:55 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
MasterBlaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,391
If you think that making $250k/year in Manhatten makes you rich then I've got nuthin' to say to you.
MasterBlaster is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:03 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterBlaster View Post
If you think that making $250k/year in Manhatten makes you rich then I've got nuthin' to say to you.
If you think earning 5x what your neighbors earn doesn't qualify you as rich, than you're right, we have nothing to say to one another.

A question for you though. If 5x the median isn't rich, does that make the median poor? Or are the modestly rich, maybe, just a little bit out of touch thinking that they are"solidly middle class" when the middle is really 80% beneath them?
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:06 PM   #13
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterBlaster View Post
The way some of you post, you'd confuse a couple of working professionals for billionaires.

Sure they have a little more disposable income, but on the right and left coast they pay very high taxes and housing costs. And someone has to watch the kids while they work. Childcare ain't cheap on the coasts. There just isn't as much left over as you would think after the costs of working are deducted.

So in my book $250k isn't rich by a long shot. Maybe in Peoria that's "the good life". But on the coasts they are still squarely middle class.

For those of you who want to "Tax the Rich" I would say that you are next to be taxed. Be careful what you ask for.
Wait a minute. Their gross is above $400K and after tax they clear $300K.

The phrase that set off much of the firestorm was
Quote:
Like most working Americans, insurance, doctors’ bills, utilities, two cars, daycare, groceries, gasoline, cell phones, and cable TV (no movie channels) round out our monthly expenses. We also have someone who cuts our grass, cleans our house, and watches our new baby so we can both work outside the home. At the end of all this, we have less than a few hundred dollars per month of discretionary income. We occasionally eat out but with a baby sitter, these nights take a toll on our budget. Life in America is wonderful, but expensive.
They are not at all like "most working Americans". There's nothing wrong with the incomes they earn - they both chose tough and demanding fields. They appear to have committed themselves to a costly lifestyle – expensive mortgage, high property taxes but private schools for the children. The problem is they are in the top 2% but don’t believe it, and he chose to complain about it publicly.

Quote:
The problem with the president’s plan is that the super rich don’t pay taxes – they hide in the Cayman Islands or use fancy investment vehicles to shelter their income. We aren’t rich enough to afford this – I use Turbo Tax. But we are rich enough to be hurt by the president’s plan. The next time the president comes home to Chicago, he has a standing invitation to come to my house (two blocks from his) and judge for himself whether the Hendersons are as rich as he thinks.
They have a valid point with the "super rich", as Warren Buffet (among others) points out regularly.

Everyone's taxes are going to go up. Some will suffer more than others. People that are living below their means will suffer, but adjust more easily.
MichaelB is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:14 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
I don't find this surprising. The delusions maintained by nearly all of the moderately rich (whom I'll describe as folks earning low seven to mid six figures) that I know are legendary.
I don't find it surprising either, but the delusions run throughout the economic strata. I work with people making $40-60K/yr, most with working spouses who increase their household income, who consider themselves entitled to much, much more...
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:21 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
MasterBlaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,391
The rich don't pay tax myth is just that, a myth.

High income people pay the lions share of all the taxes. The bottom 50 percent of income people pay almost nothing. It is indeed accurate to state that your government is almost entirely funded by high income people.

Also your Manhatten stats on income are way off. Don't confuse the county of New York (that includes Manhatten) with Manhatten.

<from wikipedia>

Quote:
The County of New York is the most densely populated county in the United States, and one of the most densely populated areas in the world, with a 2008 population of 1,634,795[2] living in a land area of 22.96 square miles (59.47 km˛), or 71,201 residents per square mile (27,485/km˛). It is also one of the wealthiest counties in the United States, with a 2005 personal income per capita above $100,000.[3] Manhattan is the third-largest of New York's five boroughs in population.
MasterBlaster is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:32 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
New York City includes more than just the upper east side.

I don't know where that info comes from, but if you go to the census data, you'll find numbers closer to the ones I posted.
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:45 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
New York City includes more than just the upper east side.
Amen, I say AMEN! Hallelujah!

Plenty of immigrants and po' folks scratching out a living in the 5 boros. I should know, having been one of them.

Having said that, I can also say that I find the high ramp in the marginal tax rate over 150k in income to be sufficient disincentive to work hard that I am not exactly bucking for promotion beyond where I am.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:46 PM   #18
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 281
Quote:
So in my book $250k isn't rich by a long shot. Maybe in Peoria that's "the good life". But on the coasts they are still squarely middle class.
Some other columnists have estimates that if they pay $100K in state and federal taxes they are probably grossing nearly $400K.

Here is an interesting blog on the same topic -
http://www.samefacts.com/2010/09/eco...ng-of-the-rich
TooFrugal is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:58 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Hmmm, his blog did not go off the deep end, but he was not swimming in shallow water either. I've got most of the same expenses that this guy has, but can do it on a 5-figure taxable income. And I use TurboTax as well. But apparently unlike him, I am rich so I can afford my expenses.

There is no hint of where he blows his money. Yardman, maid, private school, day care, extracurricular activities like art, music, sports for the kids, property taxes, and income taxes are not especially onerous expenses. What does he spend his money on?
LOL! is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 07:14 PM   #20
Administrator
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterBlaster View Post
The way some of you post, you'd confuse a couple of working professionals for billionaires.

Sure they have a little more disposable income, but on the right and left coast they pay very high taxes and housing costs. And someone has to watch the kids while they work. Childcare ain't cheap on the coasts. There just isn't as much left over as you would think after the costs of working are deducted.

So in my book $250k isn't rich by a long shot. Maybe in Peoria that's "the good life". But on the coasts they are still squarely middle class.

For those of you who want to "Tax the Rich" I would say that you are next to be taxed. Be careful what you ask for.
The young wife and I have been this couple. When I was at the big NYC law firm, we regularly paid over $100k in federal income tax. But I would never, ever, bitch and moan that we didn't have enough money. When my young first year associates would grumble about their $150k per year starting salary, I would remind them that the lady cleaning our office at night was raising a family of 4 on far less than that.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unable to connect to E-R.org Amethyst Forum Admin 8 04-04-2009 06:12 PM
Cheapest way to repair/minimize scrape on car door? soupcxan Other topics 22 01-17-2009 08:10 PM
250K income - Pointers? Username79 Young Dreamers 20 10-30-2008 07:33 AM
Unable to edit own posts? cute fuzzy bunny Forum Admin 21 06-23-2005 07:15 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.