|
01-03-2012, 01:34 PM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 898
|
VFWAX vs VTIAX ?
A casual look at the data on Vangurd's site makes both funds look quite similar, except for age.
What differences (besides age) do you see, and why would you pick one over the other?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-03-2012, 02:07 PM
|
#2
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
|
They are quite similar. Not sure it makes much difference. Both have EFT and fund classes so capital gains are not likely down the road, difference in expense ration is 0.02%.
|
|
|
01-03-2012, 03:18 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
I am not familiar with either, so looked them up for myself. Both are word-wide equity, ex-US. One uses the FTSE index, the other MSCI. Apparently, although these two indices are defined by two different entities, they come fairly close together, hence the same basic performance for the two funds.
I wonder why Vanguard created two different funds which do pretty much the same thing.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
01-03-2012, 06:41 PM
|
#4
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 898
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound
I am not familiar with either, so looked them up for myself. Both are word-wide equity, ex-US. One uses the FTSE index, the other MSCI. Apparently, although these two indices are defined by two different entities, they come fairly close together, hence the same basic performance for the two funds.
I wonder why Vanguard created two different funds which do pretty much the same thing.
|
Especially since one has been around for many years.
|
|
|
01-03-2012, 06:52 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lou-evil
Posts: 2,025
|
The Total Int'l Index has been reconfigured over the past few years. It used to exclude Canada and I recall it being strictly split between developed mkts index and emerging w/o regard to how much economic weight/GDP or whatever the country really contributed. For ex - at the time China was a small portion of the total fund even though they had a top 5-6 economy in the world.
So at the time, the FTSE rolled out b/c it was a different twist and probably better aligned with true world weightings.
Since both are now so similar, I wonder if VG will offer just 1 fund to capture the total international mkt.
__________________
"These walls are kind of funny. First you hate 'em, then you get used to 'em. Enough time passes, gets so you depend on them"
|
|
|
01-03-2012, 06:55 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
I wonder if it could have been a somewhat political decision. Both FTSE and MSCI are investment advisory firms, and Vanguard does not want to be seen as favoring one over the other. Just a guess...
Does Vanguard have to pay fees or royalties to either of these, I wonder?
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
01-03-2012, 07:01 PM
|
#7
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 398
|
VTIAX (Total International Index) and VFWAX (FTSE All-World Ex-US Index) are very similar. This includes equity exposure, return, and availability (fund and ETF, investor and admiral shares, expense ratios, etc).
The main difference is that VTIAX has some small-caps, which makes it *slightly* more diversified than VFWAX, which does not have small-caps. This is like the difference between a Total Stock Market Index and an S&P500 Index. Similar returns, but not identical.
VTIAX was originally a fund of funds (European Index, Asian Index, Emerging Market Index), which made it ineligible for the foreign tax credit on dividends. It also didn't have Canada. This made VFWAX a better choice for most people. However, VTIAX changed its index a year or so ago and now includes Canada. Also, it's no longer a fund of funds so is eligible for the foreign tax credit, just like VFWAX. This provides a ~$100 tax credit for every $100K invested. In my opinion, the nod goes to VTIAX because it has small-caps.
I have VFWAX but would change to VTIAX if I could do so with no capital gains taxes. But no big deal either way.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|