|
02-27-2009, 01:15 PM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 599
|
Weird refi question
We are going to sell our house (or try to anyway) and downsize and I can't decide if I should refinance the house now from a 6.5% rate to a longer term and a 4.75% rate. I will have to spend $8k in closing costs plus commit $75K of my cash to get under the jumbo threshold of $417,001. By doing the refi it would lower our SWR from 2.9% to about 2.4% because the payment would drop considerably.
Normally, I think the answer would be NO don't do it since we don't plan to be in the house long enough to recoup the $8K in closing costs, but I am soon to be unemployeed and I don't think I can get the refi done when I have no earned income (I may be wrong about this).
So, do I leave the loan alone and take the risk that the house will get sold in a reasonable amount of time and live with the higher SWR but conserve cash, or do I play it safe and get the lower payment and lower SWR of 2.4% by doing the refi, and use $83K in cash in the process? Is going from a 2.9% SWR to 2.4% worth using up basically a year's worth of living expenses in other words?
What am I missing here?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-27-2009, 01:41 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,543
|
if you're going to lose your job, i'd say hoard the cash
|
|
|
02-27-2009, 01:45 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
I would agree. Personally I'd apply that to almost anyone -- preserve your cash if you have any question about job security in this economy. Debt reduction is a wonderful thing, but right now nothing is more wonderful than lots of liquidity.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
02-27-2009, 01:46 PM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,021
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardude
Is going from a 2.9% SWR to 2.4% worth using up basically a year's worth of living expenses in other words?
|
I don't think it would be to me were I in your shoes. Right now I'd much rather have the cash.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
02-28-2009, 06:27 PM
|
#5
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
I would agree. Personally I'd apply that to almost anyone -- preserve your cash if you have any question about job security in this economy. Debt reduction is a wonderful thing, but right now nothing is more wonderful than lots of liquidity.
|
Ziggy: Yeah, I guess I could use the money to buy some more Berkshire Monday. I bought some Friday before last for $2250, so $2000 per share is certainly not out of the question.
Quote:
if you're going to lose your job, i'd say hoard the cash
|
Good point.........
Quote:
Right now I'd much rather have the cash. 02-27-2009 08:45 PM
|
And another vote for keeping the cash. That's what I was leaning towards, but I sure like bouncing ideas off others. Thanks.
|
|
|
02-28-2009, 09:01 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
|
I'd lean towards holding the cash. With liquidity you have options and ability ride out a much longer jobless spell. No telling how long a job search might take in the next year. I'd opt for safety (cash) in the current economic climate.
|
|
|
03-02-2009, 07:55 AM
|
#7
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
I'd lean towards holding the cash. With liquidity you have options and ability ride out a much longer jobless spell. No telling how long a job search might take in the next year. I'd opt for safety (cash) in the current economic climate.
|
I actually was not going to search too hard for a job, if at all. I think we have enough money to quit on if we can downsize the house. Actually, even with the bigger house we are at a 2.9% SWR right now, although the portfolio keeps dropping so that's gonna keep rising I'm afraid.
I still want/need to downsize, but I think I have some time to do it. This is probably a terrible time to try to sell the house, but our realtor has a doctor moving in from Chicago so maybe he will bite.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|