Portal Forums Links Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Log in

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
What is the point in doing a Roth IRA conversion all at one time?
 03-29-2010, 01:13 PM #1 gone traveling   Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 125 What is the point in doing a Roth IRA conversion all at one time? I seem to be confused. As I understand it, a person can convert any part of his traditional IRA to a Roth IRA for any tax year. But he could also convert all in 2010, but allow it to be taxed one-half in 2010 and the other half in 2011. Now couldn't he just convert one-half in 2010 and the other half in 2011 instead? What is the difference aside from the paperwork of doing it all at once vs. over the two years? Also, since the marginal tax rate goes up with income, it seems that it could less advantageous to convert a large IRA, since the later parts of the conversion would be taxed at a higher rate than if the conversion were spread over a number of years such that the conversion would be at the lower marginal tax rate. For example: Assume someone is in the 15% marginal tax rate with \$10K of income to spare until he would hit the 25% marginal tax rate, and has \$50K to convert. If he would convert it all in 2010, he would have \$20K of income due to the conversion, which would result in for 2010, \$10K being taxed at 15%, \$15K being taxed at 25%, and the same for 2011, with a net result of: 2 * (\$10K * 15% + \$15K * 25%) = \$10.5K If instead he spread out the conversion over 5 years, the tax rate would be 5 * (\$10K * 15%) = \$7.5K I suppose that if the tax rates would go up, this could make sense, perhaps partially. Or if the person wanted to start taking out a good chunk in 5 years, having the conversion done as early as possible would have some benefit. But aside from that, I just don't understand what the big deal is. Am I missing something here? __________________
 Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free! Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more! Join Early-Retirment.org For Free - Click Here
 03-29-2010, 01:56 PM #2 Thinks s/he gets paid by the post   Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,841 What's missing is that those who earned more than \$100K in past years couldn't convert at all. And because of their high salary in prior years they weren't able to contribute, so, the account is relatively small. Oh, and . . . your government needs the \$\$\$. __________________ __________________ Only got A dimple, would have preferred 2!
03-29-2010, 02:19 PM   #3
gone traveling

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 125
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gotadimple What's missing is that those who earned more than \$100K in past years couldn't convert at all. And because of their high salary in prior years they weren't able to contribute, so, the account is relatively small. Oh, and . . . your government needs the \$\$\$.
Couldn't they still do in pieces for now on? Or are you saying that in the future, they will be restricted as well in doing conversions, with this year being the only year that they can do it?

 03-29-2010, 03:04 PM #4 Recycles dryer sheets   Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 179 Certainly I think looking at the your current tax bracket ceiling is one of the criteria that should be considered in the conversion. I think the Roth conversion is a situation where you need to consider a number of factors. Unfortunately most people (the ones who do not belong here) just look at it on the surface or do what someone else told them
 03-29-2010, 03:17 PM #5 Thinks s/he gets paid by the post   Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,225 I don't see anything important you're missing. My plan is to do chunks of Roth IRA conversion in years when my income is significantly lower than average, and to spread it out. I suspect however that many people don't have enough in their retirement accounts to need to spread it over many years. And people who use paid financial planners may have incentive to get it done "in one shot" to avoid incurring more financial planning costs than necessary.
03-29-2010, 03:18 PM   #6

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eee Bah Gum
Posts: 22,041
Quote:
 Originally Posted by swampwiz I seem to be confused. As I understand it, a person can convert any part of his traditional IRA to a Roth IRA for any tax year. But he could also convert all in 2010, but allow it to be taxed one-half in 2010 and the other half in 2011. Now couldn't he just convert one-half in 2010 and the other half in 2011 instead? What is the difference aside from the paperwork of doing it all at once vs. over the two years? Also, since the marginal tax rate goes up with income, it seems that it could less advantageous to convert a large IRA, since the later parts of the conversion would be taxed at a higher rate than if the conversion were spread over a number of years such that the conversion would be at the lower marginal tax rate. For example: Assume someone is in the 15% marginal tax rate with \$10K of income to spare until he would hit the 25% marginal tax rate, and has \$50K to convert. If he would convert it all in 2010, he would have \$20K of income due to the conversion, which would result in for 2010, \$10K being taxed at 15%, \$15K being taxed at 25%, and the same for 2011, with a net result of: 2 * (\$10K * 15% + \$15K * 25%) = \$10.5K If instead he spread out the conversion over 5 years, the tax rate would be 5 * (\$10K * 15%) = \$7.5K I suppose that if the tax rates would go up, this could make sense, perhaps partially. Or if the person wanted to start taking out a good chunk in 5 years, having the conversion done as early as possible would have some benefit. But aside from that, I just don't understand what the big deal is. Am I missing something here?
If you choose to convert half now and half next year the tax will be different because the gains or losses between this year and next year will be different.

Next year that \$50K IRA may be worth \$60K or \$40K. So, "are you feeling lucky punk?"

Actually it is not quite so much a gamble because you could convert your \$50k in January this year, and if the market falls and by December it is worth \$40K you can "recharacterize" it. (ie change your mind and put it back to a regular IRA - at least I think you can)
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Now it's adventure before dementia

03-29-2010, 08:15 PM   #7
gone traveling

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 125
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Alan If you choose to convert half now and half next year the tax will be different because the gains or losses between this year and next year will be different. Next year that \$50K IRA may be worth \$60K or \$40K. So, "are you feeling lucky punk?" Actually it is not quite so much a gamble because you could convert your \$50k in January this year, and if the market falls and by December it is worth \$40K you can "recharacterize" it. (ie change your mind and put it back to a regular IRA - at least I think you can)
I see your point. I suppose that one would need to have cash on the side to pay the taxes - it wouldn't seem prudent to cash out of the 401K early just to take advantage of a conversion. Hmm ... I need to do more pondering ...

03-29-2010, 11:06 PM   #8
Moderator Emeritus

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,636
Quote:
 Originally Posted by swampwiz Couldn't they still do in pieces for now on? Or are you saying that in the future, they will be restricted as well in doing conversions, with this year being the only year that they can do it?
This is expected to be the only year where the \$100K limit is exempted. Of course Congress could always pass a new law as part of their repair of all the other tax breaks that expire this year.
__________________
*
*

The book written on E-R.org, "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement", on sale now! For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
I don't spend much time here anymore, so please send me a PM. Thanks.

03-29-2010, 11:52 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,067
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Nords This is expected to be the only year where the \$100K limit is exempted. Of course Congress could always pass a new law as part of their repair of all the other tax breaks that expire this year.
Nords....do you have a link to that? I thought the only thing special about 2010 was the option to split the conversion income to 2 future yrs. Hadn't heard about the 100K limit being a one-time special.

 03-30-2010, 08:06 AM #10 Recycles dryer sheets   Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 179 Yes I thought the 100K limit was gone for good(or until they passed another law) but it was only this year that you could split the taxes over 2 years. The government needs money, I would imagine there is a lot of cash flow going to the government due to the roth conversions, that previously the government would not have gotten a piece of until 59 1/2 or later. Might be short term thinking on the government part, but ...........
 03-30-2010, 08:42 AM #11 Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)Give me a forum ...   Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 12,483 In 1998, when the 4 year conversion was allowed, only 25% of all folks that were eligible converted to Roths. It was quite a surprise to the Congresscritters, who were sure everyone would do it. Everyone is trumpeting the conversions because of the 2-year window open now, but a lot depends on your state. Here in Wisconsin, the state did not enact legislation that follows the fed guidelines, so the folks that do Roth conversions without consulting their tax advisors are going to be pretty pissed with their 2010 returns........ __________________ Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:) This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
03-30-2010, 09:41 AM   #12

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eee Bah Gum
Posts: 22,041
Quote:
 Originally Posted by kaneohe Nords....do you have a link to that? I thought the only thing special about 2010 was the option to split the conversion income to 2 future yrs. Hadn't heard about the 100K limit being a one-time special.
I agree. I think the limits are gone starting in 2010.

RothIRA.com - Resources and Information About Roth IRA's
Quote:
 Starting in 2010, the existing \$100,000 income test for converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA no longer applies. Conversions that occur in 2010 will be able to have half of the taxable converted amount taxed in 2011 and the other half taxed in 2012
2010 Roth IRA Conversions

Quote:
 But back in May of 2006 President Bush signed a \$70 billion tax cut provision that changed the eligibility rules for Roth IRA conversions. Starting in 2010, taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income of more than \$100,000 will be allowed to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. This change applies to all years beyond 2010 - and the income taxes due on the 2010 conversion can be spread over two years. So the 2010 conversion amount may be included as taxable income in 2011 and 2012 - helping to spread out the tax bite. Conversions in subsequent years are included in income during the tax year in which the conversion is completed. Removing the Roth IRA conversion cap however doesn't mean anyone can fund a Roth IRA, but it does mean that anyone can convert an existing IRA to a Roth IRA.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Now it's adventure before dementia

03-30-2010, 04:36 PM   #13
Moderator Emeritus

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,636
Quote:
 Originally Posted by kaneohe Nords....do you have a link to that? I thought the only thing special about 2010 was the option to split the conversion income to 2 future yrs. Hadn't heard about the 100K limit being a one-time special.
I apologize, I'm wrong here.

I thought the \$100K MAGI conversion limit was part of all the other tax breaks set to expire in 2010. However re-reading Fairmark (Conversion Rule Changes) with your question in mind, I understand now it's not explicitly stated. The two-year tax payment is only for 2010, but the removal of the \$100K MAGI limit appears to be a permanent change to the conversion rules.

And since it speeds up tax revenue for the Treasury, I can understand why Congress did it that way and probably won't mess with it...

I can also understand why Congress would also let the rest of the earlier tax reductions lapse without any further action.
__________________

__________________
*
*

The book written on E-R.org, "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement", on sale now! For more info see "About Me" in my profile.
I don't spend much time here anymore, so please send me a PM. Thanks.

 Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tmm99 FIRE and Money 64 01-11-2010 05:43 PM summer2007 FIRE and Money 17 07-12-2009 12:37 AM sweng85 FIRE and Money 9 04-21-2009 10:28 PM Maurice FIRE and Money 20 11-04-2007 03:01 AM packrat44 FIRE and Money 19 08-19-2007 12:36 PM