Join Early Retirement Today
View Poll Results: What Overall Rate of Return are you using?
3-4.99% 8 5.41%
5-6.99% 63 42.57%
7-8.99% 64 43.24%
9-10.99% 10 6.76%
Something greater - please explain optimism! 1 0.68%
Something less than 3% - please explain pessimism! 2 1.35%
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
What Overall Rate of Return do you use in your financial projections
Old 03-23-2008, 07:33 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
Arc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
What Overall Rate of Return do you use in your financial projections

I noticed in another thread that some folks think that it is a little risky to use 7-8% return in financial projections. I've always thought that 7-8% was very conservative in a portfolio with >75% equities - over a 15-20 year time frame. So what overall rate of return do you use?

Apologies if this has been done before.
Arc is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-23-2008, 07:40 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
It has been tossed around before but one more time doesn't hurt. You can play with the numbers all you want. Pick low returns and high inflation and you'll not be able to retire on 2% of your portfolio. Pick high numbers and you'll be fat, dumb and happy (for awhile) taking 6+%. The closest thing to "reality" is FIRECalc. You then need to sprinkle in your own hopes and fears.

Pick a low return and you may never have enough to retire. Pick a high return and you might have the risk of running out of money or cutting your spending when you're too old to get a j*b. We all have to "buy our ticket and take our chances."

My suggestion is to look at your spending profile as seriously as you consider your anticipated return. When things go well you can take that trip to Europe. When things are tight, a day at the local art museum is all that might be in the cards. Also, at 85 do you really think you'll be wanting to travel as much as you might at 55?
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 07:42 AM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
hankster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 649
I use 7% during the accumulation phase and 5% after retirement. Hopefully these numbers are realistic enough. If we do better, then BONUS. If we do worse, well I guess I'll w*rk a bit longer, travel less or find a part time gig.

Hank
__________________
"There is no dignity quite so impressive, and no independence quite so important, as living within your means." Calvin Coolidge
hankster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 09:51 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
OAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central, Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,635
I currently use 5.8% dropping to 4.75% in 7 more years; the 5.8% is locked for 7 years (Long term CD's - 7 to 10 years). Assuming a drop to 4.75% after that point. Age in 7 years will be 74; until then 0% withdrawal rate. Been "retired" in excess of 20 years so have a pretty good handle on expenses.
__________________
Vietnam Veteran, CW4 USA, Retired 1979
OAG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 09:53 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
I pick 7% even though a 60/40 mix’s annualized return was 9.6 percent.
__________________
May we live in peace and harmony and be free from all human sufferings.
Spanky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 09:57 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,305
I use 5% so I build in another buffer. My expectations are low and my results are usually higher. ... sleeping like a baby
__________________
Life is GREAT!
megacorp-firee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 10:06 AM   #7
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,056
When I first started out investing and was planning for retirement I used 10%. This was in 1993 and I was 100% equities. As the years went by and I slowly became more conservative I lowered my expectations. I am now at the AA I expect to maintain through retirement 40/50/10 and use 8% as an expected long term ROI.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 10:14 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
More important than the absolute level of average returns is the variability and timing. Two people retiring and both receiving an average of 7% returns over the balance of their life can have very different results based on timing.

The new intro page to FireCalc gives a super explanation and example of this.

Projecting your retirement financial results based on average returns is very dangerous........
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 10:41 AM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,007
I have been calculating my average annual return on my retirement portfolio since I retired in late 1999 for the purposes of future projections. Obviously, we have been through one harsh bear market during that time, but lo and behold it looks like we're already being served another, so maybe it's not too conservative.

pre-tax annual return (compounded) 2000-2007: 6%
after-tax annual return (compounded) 2000-2007: 5.2%

I use this latter number for my projections. Anything higher would be wishful thinking IMO. Realize this is performance of a more conservative post-retirement portfolio. Not THAT conservative, however, as I do hold almost 60% in equities.

Audrey
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 11:12 AM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
DblDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
More important than the absolute level of average returns is the variability and timing. Two people retiring and both receiving an average of 7% returns over the balance of their life can have very different results based on timing.

The new intro page to FireCalc gives a super explanation and example of this.

Projecting your retirement financial results based on average returns is very dangerous........
Your point is well taken but you have to plan. So pick a conservative estimate for your return (mine is 5.75%), inflation on the high side and have a strategy for dealing with a prolonged bear market.

DD
DblDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 11:39 AM   #11
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 69
I have been using a 4.5% return to be on the safe side of projections for post-retirement, and 5.5% for pre-retirement. Effect has been to accumulate faster, and as retirement approaches, hopefully, funds will be able to last longer.
wheel9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 01:45 PM   #12
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,894
I am using 7%. In 2001 my FA used 12% in his projections, he changed to 10% in 2003 and then, at my demand, to 8% in 2005 (our portfolio was about 90% stocks back then). Looking forward, Morningstar projects annual returns of 5.5% for bonds, 7.6% for US large caps and about 8.2 to 8.4% for riskier stocks (small caps and foreign). Morningstar predicts a 7.5% return for my overall portfolio, so I use 7% to be on the conservative side.

But in my opinion, the returns projected by Morningstar for stocks (on a risk adjusted basis) make them a less compelling investment than in the past relative to bonds. That's why my portfolio is fairly conservative for someone my age (33, 65% stocks / 35% bonds and cash). I am just not sure that, going forward, taking more risk in the stock market will be rewarded accordingly. I might be wrong, but in the mean time I am very comfortable with that asset allocation.

But I noticed that a few financial gurus still use 10% annual returns, like Dave Ramsey on his new Fox Business show...
FIREd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 03:17 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
Unfortunately the options given for this poll don't provide a good distribution --- the "bins" are too wide and the cutoffs are too close to whole numbers (I would doubt most people use anything finer than 0.5% and most use whole numbers).

I use 7% (and it's not uncommon as shown by posts above), but I almost chose 5-6.99% since it's within a hundredth. And I usually look at 6% too, so I would straddle two bins.

It looks like a few might confuse with net of inflation too...hindsight is a wonderful thing (from personal experience).
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 03:54 PM   #14
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 39
Financial guru, Dave Ramsey, and Fox news all in the same sentence?
baldeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 03:57 PM   #15
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 898
lol, baldeagle.
__________________
Money's just something you need in case you don't die tomorrow.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 04:00 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblDoc View Post
Your point is well taken but you have to plan. So pick a conservative estimate for your return (mine is 5.75%), inflation on the high side and have a strategy for dealing with a prolonged bear market.

DD
With the free SW available now or web tools such as FireCalc, it's no longer necessary to do planning assuming constant average returns. It's too bad some of the guru's keep insisting on expressing market performance in terms of only constant central tendencies since, for most of us, variability will be high and timing will be key.
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 04:01 PM   #17
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 898
I can't say that I have 'a' projection. I suppose theres an implicit projection in a 4% SWR, which is my plan. I suppose forecasting the exact end of the accumulation phase would require a single number, but I've not really done that. I have a spreadsheet that shows a range of projections, but, at the risk of sounding flip, que sera sera.
__________________
Money's just something you need in case you don't die tomorrow.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 04:56 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,490
have been using 7.5% nominal, 4-4.5% real.
d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 06:50 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Bikerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by megacorp-firee View Post
I use 5% so I build in another buffer. My expectations are low and my results are usually higher. ... sleeping like a baby

ditto.
__________________
“I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said” Alan Greenspan
Bikerdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2008, 06:57 PM   #20
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 39
Yes, I do pretty much the same. Right now I'm using 6%. We were using 8% till 4 years ago, then we reset our expectations. Right now we are allocated a little heavy to cash, (according to Morningstar XRay) 61% cash, 31.5% stocks and the remaining 7.5% in bonds. We are moving some of that cash to equities monthly, primarily T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation as well as buying some I-Bonds. We paid off our house last year and I have 31 years till my full retirement age, so we're basically working towards early retirement in 20-25 years at this point.
prgsdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Future return rate? CCdaCE FIRE and Money 20 07-24-2007 06:41 AM
2% Real Rate of Return on FI? lbymfire FIRE and Money 4 06-07-2006 06:25 AM
Bernstein's future equity return projections wildcat FIRE and Money 2 12-06-2005 09:35 AM
Financial 'Experts' - Rate of Return .......... Cut-Throat FIRE and Money 2 06-16-2004 09:47 AM
Wealth accumulation phase rate of return newellcr Young Dreamers 16 09-02-2003 07:58 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.