What's the size of your portfolio?

Value of your retirement portfolio? See my definition in the post.

  • $100,000 - $250,000

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • $250,001 - $500,000

    Votes: 12 4.9%
  • $500,001 - $1M

    Votes: 43 17.6%
  • $1M - $1,500,000

    Votes: 46 18.9%
  • $1,500,001 - $2M

    Votes: 38 15.6%
  • $2,000,001 - $2,500,000

    Votes: 23 9.4%
  • $2,500,001 - $3M

    Votes: 19 7.8%
  • $3M - $5M

    Votes: 35 14.3%
  • $5M - $7M

    Votes: 6 2.5%
  • $7M+

    Votes: 17 7.0%

  • Total voters
    244
See, you and Amethyst found a work around perfectly. If the deduction of inheritance doesn't affect the range in the poll, there's no problem at all. But I think some people had substantial inheritance, so it would be different. Yes, it's their money, but they didn't earn it. However, I understand their position. If I ever get an inheritance (that's a big and distant 'if), I'll probably think that it must be included because it's now *my/our* money though I didn't go to a job to get it.
I completely understand the reason for wanting to not include inheritances in the poll. For those not expecting to receive one, the results are then perhaps more meaningful.
 
Yes, but that particular competition tends to backfire with age. Some ladies may not have so much on top when younger, but as age continues, they are still...on top, if you know what I mean...:LOL::cool: Whereas, this song now applies to their former detractors:


Well, you know what boys are talking about...so we do cup sizes in the youth?:LOL::facepalm: however, feet would work too.... unless the winner is who wears a smaller shoe...
 
I dunno...

Growing up, I do not remember we boys talking about our "hand" size. At least that was true in my circle. But I knew girls talked about their "foot" size, as I overheard my older sister and her friends a few times.

But we boys did talk about girls' "feet" too. It, or they, were just, well, fascinating.
 
Back
Top Bottom