Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
When you retire, you need less income than before to survive?
Old 03-07-2012, 07:52 PM   #1
Confused about dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5
When you retire, you need less income than before to survive?

I've read in various articles that most people need only a percentage of their current income when they reach retirement age. For example, if a person's expenses amount to $30K a year, they only need 80% of it in their senior years (do not recall the exact figure).

That seems counterintuitive - with medical expenses, it seems you would need much more when you retire.

How do people figure LESS (rather than more) is needed in retirement age, it seems it would be the opposite.
tgc641 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-07-2012, 07:54 PM   #2
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,057
Welcome to the site.

Why not introduce yourself here and tell us a little about yourself.

Hi, I am... - Early Retirement & Financial Independence Community
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 07:59 PM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,474
Welcome, tgc641.

As for your question...

You aren't saving for retirement any more.
You aren't paying FICA any more.
You don't have to pay for gas to commute to work.
Taxes are lower.

These can be some of the big sources of savings.

There are also expenses in retirement that can be greater than beforehand, depending on what you want to do in retirement. I knew that I'd want to spend more on entertainment. Other members here often enjoy a lot of travel which can be expensive.

I'd suggest starting with your present spending, thinking about it, and adding and subtracting to form your estimates in the ways that make sense to you.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.

Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 09:34 PM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 702
Just to add a few things that W2R pointed out.

The mortgage should be paid off around retirement time.
The expenses of raising a family are gone.
No need for term life insurance
Possibly only one car is required.
You don't need to live in an expensive location where the jobs are.



Welcome!
FreeAtLast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 10:57 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Leonidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the stars at night are big and bright
Posts: 2,847
Not all retirement looks the same. And in the case of early retirement it can be significantly different. I retired at 45 with young kids still at home, a mortgage, my vehicle fleet has more than doubled in size (plus I lost the company car), college tuition bills come in regularly, etc.

My expenses did not go down in retirement.

The answer is that there is no coefficient of income that you multiply by to get an answer. That was dreamed up by some 30 something journalist writing some financial porn for people who want easy answers. The real answer is that you have to determine how much you need to fund your retired life. The longer you plan to be retired, the more stuff you want/need to do in retirement, the more money you will need. Some people decide to work longer to have more to spend in retirement while others decided to live more frugally in a longer retirement.
__________________
There is no pleasure in having nothing to do; the fun is having lots to do and not doing it. - Andrew Jackson
Leonidas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 11:01 PM   #6
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 628
You can have more time to enjoy cooking rather than eating out 'cause your late to/from work, or more time to repair around the house rather than hiring it done.
Come to think of it, these end up costing more...nevermind.
devans0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 01:29 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
obgyn65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwestern city
Posts: 4,061
I am not FIREd yet but when it happens I plan to spend more on travels, and spend much less on taxes. However, my major "savings" will be that I don't have to save money anymore when I stop w*rking...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgc641 View Post
How do people figure LESS (rather than more) is needed in retirement age, it seems it would be the opposite.
__________________
Very conservative with investments. Not ER'd yet, 48 years old. Please do not take anything I write or imply as legal, financial or medical advice directed to you. Contact your own financial advisor, healthcare provider, or attorney for financial, medical and legal advice.
obgyn65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 02:29 AM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Posts: 1,202
I do not trust in such "one size fits all" estimations.

If in your work life you try to keep up with colleagues by buying latest stuff, eat out a lot or bring take out food for all the family, retirement might enable you to reduce a lot of that and thus cut costs. In addition the saving for retirement funds goes away.

But if you are already LBYM retirement might not cut expenses significantly. In our case, the saving for retirement will be replaced by increased travelling as long as health allows and by cost of our car, to replace the free company car.

Detailed tracking of current expenses will allow a much more educated forecast than the 80% rule of thumb.
chris2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 03:48 AM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
seraphim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,555
I created a detailed spreadsheet for budgeting, which allowed me to take a good look at where money was going, and planned assets; tracking and modifying gave me a good look at where we'll be come January. When interest rates on one of my major accounts dropped drastically last week, the spreadsheet let me see instantly the effect of the rate drop.

You have to look at your own expenses to decide. I think that formula you quote is suggesting, to maintain the same lifestyle, you only need 80% of your previous gross income, because you'll be losing certain expenditures and adding none. *shrug* Could be you'll have to decrease your standard of living a bit.

We're getting rid of $30,000 a year college payments - $2500 a month. We need a lot less to maintain our current lifestyle. But we intend on improving it lol.

Welcome to the group. I'm new here myself, but have found this forum contains a lot of experienced people.
__________________
"Growing old is no excuse for growing up."
seraphim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 05:55 AM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
To early retire you have to be able to save a large portion of your income, 20, 30, 40 or even 50%. So many people on here already live on a small percentage of their income. Then take off all the retirement savings like no mortgage etc and you can get down to really small numbers. I'm looking at needing 30% of my gross income in retirement. Medical costs might go up, that obviously depends on your insurance policy and health, but your retirement plan should account for that increased cost.
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 06:12 AM   #11
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,375
We will have higher after tax expenses. Only thing I save is commuting expense. But I'll have 60 hours more per week to spend. A big part of that for several years will be travel. Way more cost than commuting.

Now if I have enough money to last to 110, will I need as much income? Well no. But then if having enough to last thru retirement was my goal of working, I didn't need ot be working.

Something else. Our medical insurance costs will increase in retirement.
gerntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 06:18 AM   #12
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 3,851
I live on 100% of my pre-retirement net income in retirement, adjusted annually for my PROI (personal rate of inflation). I don't feel I'll spend any less, since as I age medical expenses will increase along with the purchase of "services" (such as lawncare) which I do myself while in my mid 60's. BTW, I've been retired five years (DW will do so the end of this month) and my expenses have not gone down. OTOH, there have not been any great increase due to retirement. Our biggest expense has been travel over the last 15-20 years, and remains the biggest expense. We had no need to add to our retirement expense budget due to "delayed desires".

Any forecast/matching against gross income ignores all the variations related to taxes, retirement contributions, etc.

It's an easy way for investment companies to come up with a rough estimate of what you may need to save due to the fact that (IMHO) most folks in their accumulation years do a poor job of budget/expense tracking and can't use actual numbers in their calculations.

Just my $.02.
rescueme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 06:19 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,266
It depends on one's situation. The "80%" that you frequently hear quoted and other rules of thumb commonly assume that you spend your entire take home check, which may be valid for most people, but is definitely not valid for many on these boards.

The best thing to do is to analyze what you spent for the two years before retirement and then make adjustments to that spending for things you think will change.

For us, I think our spending will be about the same as it was prior to retirement (after adjusting for now having only one house rather than two houses).
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 06:35 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
Tons of threads around here on the idiocy of the 80% mime. The reality is that if you are working toward ER you are spending far less than you are earning. Calculate your expenses - then evaluate what it will take to generate enough money to cover those expenses in the context of no FICA, lower income taxes, no savings. Generally this amount is far below 80% of pre-retirement income.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:15 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,683
When I was planning my early retirement in 2008 at age 45, I never looked at my current income as part of that plan because it was irrelevant (and had decreased twice in the last 8 years prior to my ER). Only my expenses mattered.

Similar to what others have mentioned, when I stopped working, my commutation expenses and FICA taxes disappeared, while my medical expenses (insurance and OOP dental) rose. My goal was to have those items roughly cancel each other out, and they did. My income taxes dropped a little while my day-to-day cash expenses stayed about the same.

Bottom line - calculate your expenses from the ground up, not from an arbitrary income level down.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.

"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
scrabbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:29 AM   #16
Recycles dryer sheets
Tree-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonidas View Post
That was dreamed up by some 30 something journalist writing some financial porn for people who want easy answers.
Yup, I used to like to ogle figures. Now I like to ogle figures.
__________________
"The future's uncertain, and the end is always near. Let it roll, baby, roll." - The Doors
Tree-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:50 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,015
You might "need" less income, but you might want to spend more then you were spending before retiring - especially if you were doing a lot of saving like we were: too busy working to spend much, and putting large chunks away to invest/save.

We spend more post-retirement than we did pre-retirement. When you are retired, you have the time to spend money on things you want to do. Things like travel can cost quite a bit, if that's what you fancy.

I'm sure we are not alone in how our spending changed after retiring. So you must look at what you want to do/spend after retiring.

Audrey
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:53 AM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alberta/Ontario/ Arizona
Posts: 3,393
great responses. Not much to add other than to agree that one size certainly does not fit all. Also it's expenses that count and you should not start with income as the base to determine how much you need in retirement. For what it's worth in our case we are spending about 30% more than before.
Danmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 08:00 AM   #19
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danmar View Post
great responses. Not much to add other than to agree that one size certainly does not fit all. Also it's expenses that count and you should not start with income as the base to determine how much you need in retirement. For what it's worth in our case we are spending about 30% more than before.
+1

Our spending is also up ~30% / year caused by doing a lot more of the things we didn't have time for while working.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 08:10 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Alberta/Ontario/ Arizona
Posts: 3,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan View Post
+1

Our spending is also up ~30% / year caused by doing a lot more of the things we didn't have time for while working.
For sure. We are spending more on travel, entertainment, and house expenses(bought two more places) , as well as auto expenses ( have more cars at the new places). We never included savings as an expense category, so reductions have been minimal and relate to work type expenses.
Danmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why I prefer Cuba to Mexico or Dominican Republic as a holiday destination Frugalityisthenewblack Travel Information 35 03-27-2012 08:53 AM
Has anyone signed up to be a member of Fidelity's Greenline Forum? dessert FIRE and Money 18 03-09-2012 10:56 AM
Trick for Getting Through to a Person TromboneAl Other topics 24 03-08-2012 11:44 AM
Poll: Did you ever own/wear a leisure suit (be honest)? Midpack Other topics 67 03-07-2012 06:12 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.