![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 21
|
why not closed end funds?
How about our retirement portfolio made up of closed end funds? From what
I've read, less volatile since the manager doesn't have to sell stocks in a bear market...It seems a good Idea for the fixed income portion at least...I've read where the fee's are lower but I haven't found this, for the most part, to be true. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,052
|
Re: why not closed end funds?
One of the main problems with a closed in fund is the margin...
Very rarely do they trade for what the underlying securites sell.... and if you get in one it will of course sell for a discount!!! So, you never get your full money back that you would with an open ended fund... If you want low trading, do the index or tax managed funds... they try to keep trading low |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: north of Kansas City
Posts: 5,554
|
Re: why not closed end funds?
Why not!
Kind of yet another way to skin a cat - both specialized and a reasonably large universe to play in. Against my oft stated recommendation toward books and overthinking - a trip to the library and some Goggle research is probably in order. Back in ancient times(1970's, 1980's) in 'mult-asset land'(pre slice and dice) I putzed a little - the last being a Putnam foreign fixed income yielding 14%(good old days). Still have a dog(NOT RECOMMENDED) - gcv - purchased in dribs and drabs since the early 90's. With reinvested div.'s it's only giving about 18% yield on original investments - pretty pathetic as that works out to about 8% over the time frame - even though I tryed to purchase at points at discount to NAV. Discount to NAV is kinda the mantra in this universe - and a variety of asset classes are availible. You want an asset class that's really sucking wind (high discount to NAV) - that you 'know' will have it's day in the sun. Great place for male hormones and a little mad money - especially in bad weather and if you don't have any other fun hobbies. It's on my - one of these days list - after kayaks. heh heh heh heh |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Recycles dryer sheets
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 213
|
Re: why not closed end funds?
I do own CEFs but am not an expert by any measure.
One reason to hold them is the yield Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty CEF (RFI) yields 7.0% Vanguard REIT VIPERs ETF (VNQ) yields 2.43% Like Unclemick said always buy at a discount and check the historical discount. Some people have said discounts appear to narrowing across the board. Besides discount be careful how much leverage the funds use. A couple of good information sites are CEF connect Morningstar' CEF discussion board Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,248
|
Re: why not closed end funds?
I hold GIM, which is a CEF, but it is the only one I actually hold long term. CEFs have the nasty habit of having outsized expense ratios, since once the manager has the money, it cannot run. Many/most of the fixed income ones have lots of leverage, which usually juices both yield and risk.
You never want to buy CEFs when they are first offered, since they will inevitably go to a discount to NAV. But you can make some money with these things, provided you buy when the discount gaps out. I play with HPF and PDT, buying them whenthe dicount balloons, and selling when it narrows. This happens pretty reliably every year or so. PDT is especially attractive because an insurance company owns over 40% of it and would likely buy up all the shares and force the fund to dissolve (at NAV), if the discount got big and stayed big. But I wouldn'tr make most of these things the foundation of my portfolio.
__________________
“When you realize that you are one of the rare few who observe moral principles in their relationships with others, there is a temptation to sink into amorality, not out of conviction or pleasure but simply to avoid further pain, because there is no greater suffering than being an angel in hell, whereas a devil feels at home wherever he goes.” – Martin Page, How I Became Stupid |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| taxable versus tax-exempt bond funds | JohnEyles | FIRE and Money | 3 | 10-28-2006 02:32 PM |
| Index funds beat most active funds | JustCurious | FIRE and Money | 57 | 10-23-2006 12:14 PM |
| Question about global equity funds | Eagle | FIRE and Money | 2 | 10-18-2006 01:45 PM |
| Inverse bond funds - why the dismal performance? | soupcxan | FIRE and Money | 1 | 02-08-2005 06:03 AM |
| Vanguard Index Funds Moving From S&P To MSCI | BigMoneyJim | Other topics | 5 | 05-18-2003 04:21 AM |
|
Other
Social Knowledge
forum communities: Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 |