Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2010, 07:24 PM   #201
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
I searched for a more recent thread than this one-- did I miss the announcement?

Bank of Hawaii, Pamcah-UA Local 675 latest to get funding for early retirees - Pacific Business News (Honolulu)

Quote:
The Early Retirees Reinsurance Program is supplying $5 billion in financial assistance to approved employers to help them maintain health care coverage for early retirees not yet eligible for Medicare.

Nearly 1,000 organizations, businesses and institutions, including Bank of Hawaii and Pamcah-UA Local 675 Health & Welfare Fund, were accepted into the program in this latest round and will start receiving reimbursements for medical claims this fall, according to the statement.

The program receives applications from all 50 states and the District of Columbia; almost 2,000 applicants, including the Hawaii Medical Service Association and The Queen’s Health System, were accepted in the first round last August. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, more applications are reviewed every day.
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-05-2010, 07:58 PM   #202
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Htown Harry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords View Post
I searched for a more recent thread than this one-- did I miss the announcement?
I sure missed it. Seems as though your plan sponsor has to jump on the bandwagon and apply (like the Hawaii union did) for an individual to be eligible. And there are some restrictions:

Who can be an Early Retiree?

ANSWER: Generally, the term early retiree will apply to the early retiree (Subscriber) and an enrolled spouse, surviving spouse and/or dependent(s) (Members). When determining ERRP eligibility, all of the following must be true for the Subscriber before the Subscriber, or associated Member(s), can be considered for participation in ERRP. The Subscriber must be:

    • Age 55 and older,
    • Enrolled for health benefits in the certified employment-based plan identified on the application,
    • Not eligible for coverage under Medicare, (which the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services will verify upon receiving a sponsor's Early Retiree List), and
    • Not an active employee of the Plan Sponsor identified on the application (in accordance with the rules of the plan).

For more detailed information about who can be an early retiree, please see the early retiree-related Common Questions on the ERRP Public Website at Common Questions - Early Retirees | Early Retiree Reinsurance Program.
Htown Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 02:13 PM   #203
Recycles dryer sheets
Retire2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 489
For various reasons already cited by other posters in this thread, I have decided that I will retire in 2014. Hence, my Username: Retire2014. I am healthy and have no pre-existing condition but I still have 15 between now and medicare so I opt for the wait-until-2014 to see how the health care landscape pans out before going to HR to turn in my resignation. FYI, my older brother who ER, did not yet have Medicare, had some serious medical issues, he went to a developing country, paid out of pocket (minimal when compared to what it would have cost in the US) for top notch treatments, and has since completely "healed" from his illness. So with your portfolio, if any serious illness should befall you, you may consider doing the same. No worries.
Retire2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 07:51 PM   #204
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retire2014 View Post
I am healthy and have no pre-existing condition but I still have 15 between now and medicare so I opt for the wait-until-2014 to see how the health care landscape pans out before going to HR to turn in my resignation.
We have unofficially set Jan 1 2014 as our "earliest" FIRE date, and the date will roughly coincide with having a big enough portfolio to FIRE too (based on current projections). May stick it out a few more years to get an extra pair of belts and suspenders on the portfolio.

But the health insurance subsidy was a huge factor in our plans, no doubt about it. If it goes away or the current plan changes substantially, we'll have to work a little longer.
__________________
Retired in 2013 at age 33. Keeping busy reading, blogging, relaxing, gaming, and enjoying the outdoors with my wife and 3 kids (8, 13, and 15).
FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 08:17 PM   #205
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
So you guys are optimistic about the new law by the time it is fully implemented in 2014?

There's some talk about repeal these days.
explanade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 07:43 AM   #206
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by explanade View Post
So you guys are optimistic about the new law by the time it is fully implemented in 2014?

There's some talk about repeal these days.
Some of it has already been "repealed" - it's been all over the news and discussed here:

McDonald's, 29 other firms get health care coverage waivers - USATODAY.com

Yes, that is not "repeal" in the sense you meant - but in effect, it is the same thing.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 08:07 AM   #207
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by explanade View Post
So you guys are optimistic about the new law by the time it is fully implemented in 2014?

There's some talk about repeal these days.
Well, I won't be surprised by a repeal or massive change before 2014. But after 2014, after the free/cheap health insurance is enjoyed by the masses, I think it will be a hard sell and politically very unpopular to take it away. So I'll wait and see till 2014, and if free/cheap health insurance is available then, I'll take advantage of it. We may know what will happen after the Nov 2012 election with much greater certainty.
__________________
Retired in 2013 at age 33. Keeping busy reading, blogging, relaxing, gaming, and enjoying the outdoors with my wife and 3 kids (8, 13, and 15).
FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 08:24 AM   #208
Recycles dryer sheets
Retire2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 489
I will retire in 2014 even if health care reform is repealed. I still need to build up the portfolio some more so I just pick 2014 as a good date by which the portfolio should have reached what I need to have and to see what the health insurance landscape will look like as well.
Retire2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 09:16 AM   #209
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by explanade View Post
So you guys are optimistic about the new law by the time it is fully implemented in 2014?

There's some talk about repeal these days.
It all depends on which way the political winds blow. If the public comes to like it, politicians that voted against it will run on a platform of expanding it. Kinda like those that opposed stimulus projects, then show up at the dedication to take credit for bringing money to their state.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 10:55 AM   #210
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
Health care is very unpopular in this election. Stimulus too.

Yes they are hypocritically taking stimulus funds, writing letters on behalf of their states for stimulus money even after voting for it and continuing to say it's a bad idea.

But there's an effort to have state legislatures reject some aspects of health care, effectively preventing the establishment of exchanges for those who can't get coverage through their employers.
explanade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 11:00 AM   #211
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retire2014 View Post
I will retire in 2014 even if health care reform is repealed. I still need to build up the portfolio some more so I just pick 2014 as a good date by which the portfolio should have reached what I need to have and to see what the health insurance landscape will look like as well.
If it gets repealed it would have to be in 2013, and I don't know many will accept having such an 11th hour repeal given that many will be making plans assuming it will go forward. There's no way the people who want to repeal some or all of it will have a 2/3 majority needed to override the current president's veto. So the earliest it could realistically happen is in 2013.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 11:16 AM   #212
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
If it gets repealed it would have to be in 2013, and I don't know many will accept having such an 11th hour repeal given that many will be making plans assuming it will go forward.
After this election, those who makes plans assuming that the 2010 law will still go into effect as written have themselves to blame. Between the court challenges, the promises to defund portions of it, and the state laws being written to contravene portions of it, there's no reason to believe it will be around as written.

Of course, if some key elements go away (e.g. individual mandates for purchase of insurance) it's hard to see how the rest of it could be implemented.

Hopefully, whatever eventually replaces it will be passed with a sufficient legislative majority that we won't have to undo it after a subsequent election. That's how Medicare got passed--with a good bit of support across the spectrum. And, it stuck.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 11:52 AM   #213
Moderator Emeritus
M Paquette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 4,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
If it gets repealed it would have to be in 2013, and I don't know many will accept having such an 11th hour repeal given that many will be making plans assuming it will go forward. There's no way the people who want to repeal some or all of it will have a 2/3 majority needed to override the current president's veto. So the earliest it could realistically happen is in 2013.
I'm assuming a worst-case scenario for purposes of budgeting. That is, the current healthcare law will be modified to 1) drop the guaranteed-issue mandate (per the desires of certain campaign contributors), 2) drop the 'no canceling policies' requirement (gummint interference with Free Enterprise, dontchaknow), and 3) drop the requirement that all persons have coverage (per the demands of The Usual Suspects).

This results in DW and I being forced onto the state guaranteed-issue high priced plan, unless the Congresscritters manage to phrase the rollback of guaranteed-issue so that plans mandated by individual states are also cancelled. In that case, we'll be on the Emergency Room Free Care Plan.

So, I'm budgeting for Really Expensive Insurance for us for several years, while hoping that the Usual Suspects don't succeed in 'getting the gummint out of Medicare.' (We paid 300K into Medicare, and feel we should get something for our money. Oooooooh! A nasty sense of Entitlement! Hsssss!)
M Paquette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 03:51 PM   #214
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,983
Like everything else it's a moving target. I never anticipated I'd be second guessing early retirement. In about 6 months I'll be working for health insurance and taxes. Bank the rest and hope we can cover future health costs. It always comes back to the same issue when deciding to pull the trigger. Now with the talk about repealing the 2014 plan, retirement is questionable. Meanwhile it's about time to head to Key West and take a break.
foxfirev5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 04:42 PM   #215
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
You know, maybe it's better to move to another country.

I recall hearing that before Hong Kong was handed over to China, Canada was offering citizenship or some kind of permanent status to people from HK who had a million dollars.

Don't know if that meant they had to spend $1 million in Canada or just had the means that they could live in Canada without drawing on services or taking jobs from existing citizens.

Some countries in Europe offer visas to those who have retirement assets/income but not citizenship and no entry into their health care necessarily. But apparently you could live in these countries permanently so maybe there is a road to citizenship. I know that American descendants of some nationalities are offered dual citizenship.

If the political process remains broken there's little hope for long-term issues like medicare.
explanade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let's make a list of current healthcare inefficiencies intent FIRE Related Public Policy 30 01-15-2010 05:07 PM
Healthcare reform - a wave of early retirees? FinanceGeek Health and Early Retirement 51 07-02-2009 05:12 PM
Off To a Good Start - Does a 401(k) Make Sense For Early Retirement? JayNYC Young Dreamers 18 06-07-2008 11:53 PM
How to retire early dory36 Other topics 8 03-05-2006 09:27 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.