Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2016, 04:02 PM   #81
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
We'll know that we're headed in the right direction when there's a vast increase in the demand for engineers and a reduction in the demand for lawyers.
A steep slide in law school enrollment accelerates

The exploding demand for computer science education

All fixed.

To your broader point, if the trouble with the U.S. economy were externally imposed constraints on flexibility, innovation, etc. (i.e. supply side restrictions) then one unavoidable symptom would be rising inflation. And the harder the Fed pushed to raise output against those constraints, the more inflation we'd have.

We don't have an inflation problem. So we don't likely have a supply side economic problem.
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-18-2016, 04:14 PM   #82
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
A bit disingenuous (not of you, but in general) to call for suggestions, then say the suggestions aren't meaningful (though admitting they meet the original criteria in every respect)
Sorry. Didn't realize that a request for suggestions needed to explicitly state that they be meaningful.
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 04:31 PM   #83
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
photoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
The joke I've heard regarding the demand for CS (and STEM) workers is that there's only a shortage at the salary they (corporations) want to pay.

I think there's a lot of truth to that.
photoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 07:38 PM   #84
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 550
CaliforniaMan Long term there is only one way for a nation to come out on top of the others with all the changes caused by automation and globalization. And that is to have the best educated and most creative population. In the long run, there is simply no other solution. Whatever tactics we choose to employ, long therm we have to end up with the worlds most educated and most innovative workforce.
Agree. To have a superior education is foundation of future innovation.
I live in a neighborhood where Indian and Chinese immigrants are majority. What is interesting that housing prices went up drastically because schools became #1 in the city. Chinese and Indians raise their kids without any spoiling, disciplined and with high level of drive to succeed. Good education is not only money spending increases, although it is in many cases necessary, but the way kids are raised.
VFK57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 08:01 PM   #85
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
Sorry. Didn't realize that a request for suggestions needed to explicitly state that they be meaningful.
A snark-free observation: If we look at the symptoms (the "for starters" suggestions: the ethanol mandate, sugar price supports, the Davis-Beacon act, overly restrictive licensing) maybe we can identify and fix the aspects of our system that cause them. That's worth doing, because more significant problems (defense spending allocation, corporate "cronyism", etc) spring from the same sources.
An aside--if there's agreement that these minor, "meaningless" things are harmful, why haven't they been fixed? Would this maybe be a sign that fixing the "worth fixing" stuff will be harder yet? Best to get at the root causes with an easy case first.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 08:31 PM   #86
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by VFK57 View Post
CaliforniaMan Long term there is only one way for a nation to come out on top of the others with all the changes caused by automation and globalization. And that is to have the best educated and most creative population. In the long run, there is simply no other solution. Whatever tactics we choose to employ, long therm we have to end up with the worlds most educated and most innovative workforce.
Agree. To have a superior education is foundation of future innovation.
I live in a neighborhood where Indian and Chinese immigrants are majority. What is interesting that housing prices went up drastically because schools became #1 in the city. Chinese and Indians raise their kids without any spoiling, disciplined and with high level of drive to succeed. Good education is not only money spending increases, although it is in many cases necessary, but the way kids are raised.
VFK57 - there is a quote feature that makes it easy to block out text from another post - and it labels who said it, and links to it. (See my quote of you above... which unfortunately has you quoting CaliforniaMan inline.)

To use the quote function on a browser - look for the "Quote" button at the bottom of every post. On the android app you can select a post by tapping it - and quote is an option that pops up.

It makes the thread more readable for everyone.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
rodi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 09:09 PM   #87
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
(Emphasis added)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
There's just not as much meat there as people hope / pretend. And focusing on these things that nobody seems to be able to do distracts attention and effort from the things we can.
Such as?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
Sorry, repealing Sarbox fails the "clearly generates more savings than costs" standard.
Hmm, so I guess repealing Sarbox is out. But what is "in?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
That's not to say these things aren't worth doing. They're just not the big ticket items supporters claim. And certainly not a meaningful answer to the title question - which I assumed was the whole point.
Well, another suggestion that apparently isn't sufficient. But no hint at a proposed real answer yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
We don't have an inflation problem. So we don't likely have a supply side economic problem.
Thankfully, another hint. Maybe a demand-side problem! Helicopter Ben or a super-negative interest rate money machine! Inquiring minds want to know, ref the thread title--any positive suggestions?

samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 09:46 PM   #88
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg image.jpeg (56.7 KB, 133 views)
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 10:05 PM   #89
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Good View Post
To your broader point, if the trouble with the U.S. economy were externally imposed constraints on flexibility, innovation, etc. (i.e. supply side restrictions) then one unavoidable symptom would be rising inflation. And the harder the Fed pushed to raise output against those constraints, the more inflation we'd have.
Yes, we'd have inflation (or inflationary pressures) if we had supply-side restrictions and no concomitant demand side restrictions/impediments. If we had restrictions/impediments on both sides, we could experience no/low inflation as well as no/low GDP growth, low wage growth/low employment (as we see now, when expressed in absolute labor participation rates, etc). Food for thought.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 11:52 AM   #90
Full time employment: Posting here.
CaliforniaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 880
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
I'd say education is necessary but not sufficient. The world has many countries with education systems that are really good (better than ours), but with economies that never quite match the clear talents of their workforces (India is a clear example that comes to mind). So, yes, we need a great education system that does significantly better than the one we have now, but we also need a vibrant, flexible economy that allows those talents to be put to productive use. There are many well-known means of doing this, primarily centered around re-orienting our economy (and our workforce, and our capital) to respond to "true" market forces (as opposed to centrally-directed priorities), and to reduce government incentives that run counter to that goal. We'll know that we're headed in the right direction when there's a vast increase in the demand for engineers and a reduction in the demand for lawyers. The necessary discussion of specifics here would bring out the pig, so I don't think we'll be having a meaty discussion like that.
I did not mean to imply that the best educated population is the only issue that needs addressing, but without having it as a primary long term strategy the rest won't matter. As we all know we live in an age of increasing automation and globalization. Manufacturing and creative thinking can be done anywhere and sold anywhere. We need to have the best educated and most creative population, that is our most valuable resource. And by that I mean the population as a whole, not just the top few percent as in some of the countries to which you refer.

We already have a huge head start. We have a free thinking people, an independent judiciary, the rule of law, a stable government, and some of the best universities if not the best universities in the world.

But the world is changing and we need our entire population educated, we cannot let any other country get ahead of us on this. And this must be a long term priority. It is generational.

I agree there are many tactical issues we will face now and in the future not only education. But if we don't have the most competitive population, it won't matter.
__________________
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
Life is but a dream.
CaliforniaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 01:22 PM   #91
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post

But what one considers "digging", others may call it "mining for a solution".
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 01:23 PM   #92
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by VFK57 View Post
+1
Many economists are pointing out an opposite that despite some of middle class people moved up, the bigger part had moved down.
The Pew research that was quoted earlier completely refutes that statement.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 01:56 PM   #93
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
The Pew research that was quoted earlier completely refutes that statement.
Of course. You use same statistics and "pundits" statements who state that the economy has never been better. But in great economy we would not have sharp growth of Debt, it would go down (like in late 1990s), budget deficit would go down or disappear at all, while it turned back to growth and there would not be any need for "easy money" policies so the rates would go back to normal. Of course we can choose not to pay attention on such "meaningless" numbers.
VFK57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 02:15 PM   #94
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Nemo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8,368
What about the influence of intangibles such as morale, sense of national purpose, diminution of collective lassitude, etc?
__________________
"Exit, pursued by a bear."

The Winter's Tale, William Shakespeare
Nemo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 02:15 PM   #95
Full time employment: Posting here.
Whisper66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by VFK57 View Post
.... But in great economy we would not have sharp growth of Debt, it would go down (like in late 1990s), budget deficit would go down or disappear at all, while it turned back to growth and there would not be any need for "easy money" policies so the rates would go back to normal. Of course we can choose not to pay attention on such "meaningless" numbers.
+1 This is the classic understanding of a good economy. Seems like our country would prefer to push the current situation as far as it will go, justify it as best we can and hope for the best. I suppose if growth can overcome debt, it will all work out fine. But I prefer a country in better control of their fiscal policy.
Whisper66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 02:17 PM   #96
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
Yes, we'd have inflation (or inflationary pressures) if we had supply-side restrictions and no concomitant demand side restrictions/impediments. If we had restrictions/impediments on both sides, we could experience no/low inflation as well as no/low GDP growth, low wage growth/low employment (as we see now, when expressed in absolute labor participation rates, etc). Food for thought.
Hmm, consulting my Supply / Demand curve

If I have a supply side shock, prices increase and GDP declines
If I have a demand side shock, prices decrease and GDP declines
If I have both a supply side & demand side shock of equal magnitude prices stay the same & GDP drops.

Now consulting my history, we had a 3.3% drop in GDP and a 3.7% drop in CPI, peak to trough.

Sounds like a demand shock to me.

But either way, supply side solutions will just put further downward pressure on prices. And that's exactly what the Fed has been fighting to avoid. So either way it's hard to imagine why we'd want to prioritize solutions that exacerbate the problem

__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 02:21 PM   #97
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Senator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
My milllennial children have informed me that there are already more millennials than baby boomers.

Given the ages of Millennials, many of them are just starting out in their first jobs. This means they do not have the incomes of folks who have worked for 10, 20, 30 years or more. It also means many of them start at the bottom: retail and food service. Or they are still in school.

So millennials have increased the rolls of the lower income tier, but so what?
There will be an exponential decrease in taxes collected as the older working folks retire. They will be replaced by a lower income group, and a group that is not stigmatized to get government services rather than work.

There may be more people, but likely not more taxes collected when the boomers all retire. Of course, raising taxes solves that issue.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
Senator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 04:28 PM   #98
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
target2019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,686
Add in the govt contractors too. Raise your glass to dear Uncle Sam!
target2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 04:28 PM   #99
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
In the category of things that actually hurt recovery and employment growth since the last recession, here's a chart of Government Employment for the past two recoveries.

I'm guessing this is not what most people think happened.

The divergence from trend from 2009 to 2016 represents about 2.4MM jobs, or 1.5% difference in the unemployment rate.

So when people ask "why has recovery been so slow?" This is one big reason.

It also falls under the category of "When you're in a hole, Stop Digging!" as the unemployment rate reached as high as ~10% in 2009/10 when that attrition began.



P.S. Those blips in 2000 and 2010 are temporary census workers.
__________________
Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2016, 04:38 PM   #100
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
We have 22 million government workers out of about 120 million US workers. So, that's 18%.

I guess there's room to grow. France's number is 44%, and I just read that Saudi Arabia's is 70%. Nice! Roughly one Frenchman to oversee and regulate the other French worker, and in Saudi Arabia's case, 2 regulators per worker. Supernice! The more the merrier?

Everybody is employed.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thoughts on the economy David1961 FIRE and Money 89 09-19-2012 07:03 PM
Your Thoughts Pls: Paying for Tax Advice instead of for the Tax Return itself? (LONG) Amethyst FIRE and Money 37 02-21-2010 08:49 AM
Your Thoughts On PIMCO Total Return? Marcretire FIRE and Money 32 01-29-2009 08:24 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:38 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.