Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Smaller housing to become more popular?
Old 06-13-2007, 11:26 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,323
Smaller housing to become more popular?

Feel free to call me a fool, but am I the only one who thinks there might be a new trend towards condos and smaller homes with boomers retiring and downsizing? I just started pondering this, and wondered if anyone else considers this a possibility?
So, instead of the 2,400 sq. ft. and UP, 2 car garage house, minimum 3 bedroom being the smallest of the most popular homes in the next 20 years or so, we might go to a trend of actually smaller places...or condos.
Any opinions from you experts out there?
__________________

__________________
Orchidflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-13-2007, 12:52 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 7,432
I'm already in the smaller house corner. Currently live in a 1200 sq ft house. Lower maintenance, taxes and insurance. Of course it's just me and the mutt so I don't need much sq footage.
__________________

__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Full time wuss.......
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 12:52 PM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 80
Actually the trend is in the opposite direction, retirees are not downsizing.
__________________
AzDreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 01:09 PM   #4
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Another hot topic is that builders are starting to build the smaller homes very, very upscale. Bottom line is that they want to maintain their profit margin so when size decreases, frills increase.

We're in a big house and I regret it at times. We'll downsize but the market is not ripe for selling now. Fortunately it's paid for and is a nice house so waiting it out is no hardship. But when it does sell, it should add a nice boost to the nest egg.

I do think smaller will be the trend in the long run.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 01:12 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
lazygood4nothinbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,895
i'd only have a smaller house and i still have two rooms i don't need. mom had a larger house and my brother has an even larger one than that, and with soaring ceilings, just the space you don't want to air-condition in florida.

i prefer intimate spaces afforded in smaller houses, i find them less intrusive and friendlier.
__________________
"off with their heads"~~dr. joseph-ignace guillotin

"life should begin with age and its privileges and accumulations, and end with youth and its capacity to splendidly enjoy such advantages."~~mark twain - letter to edward kimmitt 1901
lazygood4nothinbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 01:13 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,321
Here in our "55 or better" community of 800 single family houses, ours is among the smallest at 1840 sq ft. We are somewhat baffled by the couples (or even singles) who buy homes here with basements or lofts or even both! Some of these houses have well over 4000 sq ft. That isn't the kind of downsizing we sought.

We moved from a 4-bedroom, two story colonial to a one level, 2-bedroom and den house. It is plenty big enough for me and Mrs. Grumpy. I would have preferred a condo and could have been perfectly happy in 1500 sq. ft. or less by DW likes more space.

So, as far as the OP's thesis that retirees will seek smaller housing, we are not seeing that trend where we live.

Grumpy
__________________
grumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 01:37 PM   #7
Moderator
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,612
We downsized when we left Houston last year. We had a 2200 sf house there. When we moved to the country we bought a 1150 sf house on a half acre of land.

We could have afforded much more, but the summer cooling bills and high property taxes are the main reason we went much smaller. Maintenance and insurance bills are also lower. It also helps us resist the urge to accumulate more stuff; we had to get rid of a LOT of stuff (and store the rest in the garage) just to move!
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)

RIP to Reemy, my avatar dog (2003 - 9/16/2017)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 03:38 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,323
Guess I just do not get why anyone would want to get more house, more bills, more outside help and so forth when they get older. Have kids and grandkids who visit at the holidays, so you need the room? Obviously, nobody has ever heard of hotels and motels for that great once a year week of visits.
Regardless, I read that boomers are downsizing in some articles and going to condos...and the complete opposite in others (that boomers are buying the bigger houses with lots of extra luxuries).
Verrrry interesting...
__________________
Orchidflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 04:41 PM   #9
Moderator Emeritus
Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pine Island, Florida
Posts: 6,868
Send a message via AIM to Khan
My house is about 1000sf and it's too big.
__________________
"Knowin' no one nowhere's gonna miss us when we're gone..."
Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 04:51 PM   #10
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 53
The assessor says our house is 876 sqft, though that doesn't count the semi-finished basement room. Enough space for the two of us, but there wont be any downsizing in our future.

If anything we'd upsize to something with more than 1.0 baths, and I wouldn't mind having a garage at some point. At least we own it free and clear!
__________________
mja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 05:32 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
We will downsize. We have way too much. I am thinking of targeting somewhere around 1200 to 1500 sq ft. If we get a free standing house, it will be a ranch.
__________________
chinaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 05:51 PM   #12
Recycles dryer sheets
Culture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 491
I can't speak for the rest of the county, but I can speak for Houston. The problem here is neighborhoods. I would like to be in a smaller home, and so would others I know. The problems is that small equals cheaper, and the cheaper neighborhoods are areas that 95% of people are not willing to live in if they can afford better. Generally, most people are not willing to stop until they move up to at least the 2500 SF level (say ballpark $150k to $200k in the suburbs). Unfortunately, the lower the income, the higher the percentage of people who make poor neighbors. I have no idea why this is true, but IMHO it is.

Essentially, my point is this. You can live in Houston in a $50k home. They are widely available. Go to realtor.com and there are 11 available in zip code 77093, in the heart of the city. Do you really want to? I don't.

The counter to this is to make a neighborhood of expensive small homes. However, most people, myself included, would rather have a 2500 SF/$200,000 house than a 1200 SF/$200,000 house if they are both available in the same area. Expensive for the sake of expensive does not generally attract buyers.
__________________
Culture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 06:42 PM   #13
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Culture View Post
The counter to this is to make a neighborhood of expensive small homes. However, most people, myself included, would rather have a 2500 SF/$200,000 house than a 1200 SF/$200,000 house if they are both available in the same area. Expensive for the sake of expensive does not generally attract buyers.
I'm in some agreement with that. Our 876sf is right on the edge as far as neighborhoods go. Not too bad, but most folks would probably go elsewhere. For the record, our house could probably sell for $140-150k.

It can be hard to find the balance; my ideal would be around 1200sf in a lovely old neighborhood, but those are often $300k+ here. Hard for me to justify double the price for 1/3 more sqft. The only suitable alternatives are in the smaller nearby cities, or in tract-house sprawl. This is in Madison, WI, BTW.
__________________
mja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 07:24 PM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 135
If it is anything like my uncle's recent downsizing from 5000 sq ft to 4000 sq ft, a trend perhaps could be starting. On the other hand, my house could be his cottage...

Hillbilly
__________________
Hillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 07:31 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
tryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,449
Problem with smaller n'cheaper is that the surroundings are usually less desirable.

A friend - broker - is developing a 55+ community. No smaller n'cheaper trend here. All 400k+ and "loaded" (cherry cabinets, granite counters, ...).
__________________
FIRE'd since 2005
tryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 07:57 PM   #16
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 27
I know my parents (boomers) are looking to downsize...or at least find something on one level.

However, I think for the most part, we will not see a trend downward. A person's psycology doesn't change (much) with age. And unfortunately for most Americans a house is a status symbol.

"I live in <fill in your local high-end neighborhood>" or "I have 'x' acres with 100 year old oak trees" are badges of honor, which far too many people wear with pride. With the exception of my parents, most the boomers I know are actually upsizing. They are at the peak of their career/income, and the nest is empty. Why not buy/build their dream home?
__________________
-Warthog
Warthog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 09:22 PM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,304
It might be different for posters on this board, but I believe the trend is towards McMansions and luxury digs, not downsizing... the houses that are currently selling are the high end of the Million dollar (more than entry level $1M) plus homes, where the people that are buying them still have mucho dinero to spend.
__________________
Life is GREAT!
megacorp-firee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 09:52 PM   #18
Full time employment: Posting here.
Lakedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchidflower View Post
Guess I just do not get why anyone would want to get more house, more bills, more outside help and so forth when they get older. ..
Definitely agree -- I live on a large lake but chose a small (1450 sqft) house when I moved here about ten years ago. Even though most properties on this lake are second homes, the average house is over twice that size. I could never understand why anyone would want to take care of a large house, esp. a vacation home.
__________________
Lakedog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 11:36 PM   #19
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 188
My wife and I are planning a retirement home in Texas. What we can't agree on is the size. I think 1800 square feet or less is fine; she thinks anything less than 3000 will be impossible. I suppose it's what you get used to, but I find it hard to justify two extra bedrooms for grown children who might leave the opposite coasts at Christmas (but probably won't).
__________________
playaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2007, 12:16 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Telly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,448
Here's our house. A few more rooms and fireplaces than we really need these days. Yeah yeah I know, some of the shingles look a bit dicey, but you know... none worse shod than the shoemaker!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TS_house2.jpg (94.8 KB, 2 views)
__________________

__________________
-- Telly, the D-I-Y guy --
Two fools dancing on the hands of time
Telly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
long term housing..rent or buy ambition187 Young Dreamers 53 05-18-2007 02:39 PM
'Worry-Free' Housing Billy Life after FIRE 74 04-16-2007 09:54 PM
Sizing the Housing Bubble wabmester FIRE and Money 434 04-06-2007 11:14 PM
alternative housing tikitoast Young Dreamers 24 05-04-2006 05:04 PM
Retirement Housing Choices poocher Life after FIRE 15 01-08-2004 07:01 PM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.