FreeAtLast
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 702
I just retired a few months ago and I plan to cancel my term life this month.
If there is no need for insurance and keeping the coverage is being viewed as an "investment", then the probability of death in any given year of the remaining term would need to be greater than the annual premium divided by the face amount. I think in most cases the insured would need to be in pretty poor health for it to be a wise investment.
Hamlet said:I was looking at the Social Security Actuarial Life Table here--
Actuarial Life Table
It's pretty interesting. Say that an average male is 40 years old when they buy a 20-year term policy. Their yearly risk of death in the first year is 0.002323, and in the last it is 0.010584. So in the last year of the policy, they are 4 times more likely to die than in the first year of the policy.
If the policy was $100k, it would make sense to keep it if the premium was less than about $1000/year. I think that is fairly likely to be the case for a lot of people in this situation.
For people who buy term life relatively late in life, it may make sense to keep it the last few years, regardless of the insurance need.
I think it says something about me that I think I would feel better about dying early if I knew it was costing an insurance company a lot of money
Come to mention it, I've never had one pay out on me. Yes, I realize that's purely anecdotal, but still...Only 3% of term life contracts are ever paid out on. YMMV..........
Only 3% of term life contracts are ever paid out on. YMMV..........