ambition187
Dryer sheet wannabe
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2007
- Messages
- 17
Hi all,
I was wondering what everyone thought were FIRE-friendly careers.
By FIRE-friendly, I specifically mean:
-Lucrative
-Non-status dependent (culture promotes high spending, ex i-banking)
-Non-big city dependent
The reason I ask is, I am about to venture off into my first engineering job. However, I've heard engineering gigs can be kind of disappointing career wise (hard to get promoted, bureaucracy, hard work doesn't get you much). If I stay this path I would be interested in going on the mgmt instead of technical track. Not sure if that changes much.
Maybe that statement isn't true (feel free to refute) and I will have to investigate myself as I start work soon.
But if it is, I would be open to a career change.
I have heard finance can be lucrative, but from what I can tell its also very status-oriented (nice car, nice suits, nice watch, etc.) so the more you make the more you spend. I am not interested in an environment where that is the case (for obvious FIRE reasons!) Has anyone taken this career path and managed to avoid the "Rat race"?
I would consider Actuarial work, maybe life, leading up to CFP designation and becoming a financial planner in my 30's (heh this could actually be useful for my personal ER!). From what I can tell this is a pretty lucrative path for a moderate amount of work (although some might call it boring work).
Has anyone taken this route or something similar? In fact, maybe I could become a FIRE-consultant heh heh heh
Well hoping to get some comments from engineers, actuaries, or even others on this topic!
Thx,
ambition187
I was wondering what everyone thought were FIRE-friendly careers.
By FIRE-friendly, I specifically mean:
-Lucrative
-Non-status dependent (culture promotes high spending, ex i-banking)
-Non-big city dependent
The reason I ask is, I am about to venture off into my first engineering job. However, I've heard engineering gigs can be kind of disappointing career wise (hard to get promoted, bureaucracy, hard work doesn't get you much). If I stay this path I would be interested in going on the mgmt instead of technical track. Not sure if that changes much.
Maybe that statement isn't true (feel free to refute) and I will have to investigate myself as I start work soon.
But if it is, I would be open to a career change.
I have heard finance can be lucrative, but from what I can tell its also very status-oriented (nice car, nice suits, nice watch, etc.) so the more you make the more you spend. I am not interested in an environment where that is the case (for obvious FIRE reasons!) Has anyone taken this career path and managed to avoid the "Rat race"?
I would consider Actuarial work, maybe life, leading up to CFP designation and becoming a financial planner in my 30's (heh this could actually be useful for my personal ER!). From what I can tell this is a pretty lucrative path for a moderate amount of work (although some might call it boring work).
Has anyone taken this route or something similar? In fact, maybe I could become a FIRE-consultant heh heh heh
Well hoping to get some comments from engineers, actuaries, or even others on this topic!
Thx,
ambition187