Hedge Fund Collapse..........

FinanceDude

Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
12,483
read in the WSJ the other day that Aranth (spelling?) Advisors took a big bet and lost.........and have lost 65% of their value............or 6.5 billion dollars............... :LOL:

Brewer, any comment:confused:
 
They were idiots with little/no risk controls. Plain and simple.
 
brewer12345 said:
They were idiots with little/no risk controls.  Plain and simple.

Makes sense.............what about LTCM? Those guys on paper were not idiots...... :D
 
FinanceDude said:
Makes sense.............what about LTCM?  Those guys on paper were not idiots...... :D

Caveat Emptor, as with all investments.
 
A good idea about why more common folks are headed into Hedge Funds from The Economist:
http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7912700

In part:
"And yet investors may be willing to gamble, despite the higher fees, because they desperately need high returns. The bear market between 2000 and 2002 brought a sober reassessment of the future returns likely from equities and bonds. With bonds yielding 4-5% and equities returning perhaps 3% on top, composite future returns of 6% or so looked inadequate. Peter Harrison, chief executive of MPC, a fund manager, says that American pension funds have analysed their liabilities. “They need more than 6% to make up the shortfalls in their funds. Whether they earn alpha or not, they have to roll the dice and try to get it."
 
FinanceDude said:
Makes sense.............what about LTCM?  Those guys on paper were not idiots...... :D
Bill Sharpe also says that it's a good thing the Nobel Committee can't reclaim their awards.
 
yakers said:
A good idea about why more common folks are headed into Hedge Funds from The Economist:
http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7912700

In part:
"And yet investors may be willing to gamble, despite the higher fees, because they desperately need high returns. The bear market between 2000 and 2002 brought a sober reassessment of the future returns likely from equities and bonds. With bonds yielding 4-5% and equities returning perhaps 3% on top, composite future returns of 6% or so looked inadequate. Peter Harrison, chief executive of MPC, a fund manager, says that American pension funds have analysed their liabilities. “They need more than 6% to make up the shortfalls in their funds. Whether they earn alpha or not, they have to roll the dice and try to get it."

Haven't they heard of Vanguard?? :D
 
FinanceDude said:
Haven't they heard of Vanguard?? :D

I think The Economist article does somewhat explain why there is such a flow of money into hedge funds, even by some who should know better. And it is indeed a backhand endorsement of the Vanguard approach.
 
Back
Top Bottom