No estate as of yet to think of, but he's thinking of later on.
I think the application of a Whole Life Insurance policy as any sort of 'remedy' to Estate Taxes is way overstated.
1) Whole Life is a long term commitment, due to the cost of getting out of the policy.
2) You can't predict the future. Estate Tax regs change, your estate value changes. IMO, long term commitments of questionable value don't make sense when applied to long term unknowns.
3) Most of the stated benefits of Whole Life fall apart unless you also assume it is a good investment vehicle. There is very little support for that, outside of the people who profit from selling it.
4) Liquidity *may* be a valid use of Whole Life, to pay an Estate Tax that is due. But, since you don't even know if you will have an Estate issue, and you further don't know if you would have a liquidity issue on top of that, it seems like an expensive way to cover a 'what if, and what if, AND what if....', scenario. I suspect there are cheaper ways to get or plan for liquidity if you need it.
One more suggestion - stay out of 'arguments' with the insurance salesperson. They are experts at defending their products (else they would starve), and will make the deal sound good to uninformed people. Then, you will look like you are the one contradicting the expert. I would suggest you explain to DH the cons and show evidence and do it away from the salesperson. Then just inform the salesperson you have chosen not to use their services. There really is no good in discussing it with them, just inform them of your decision.
My two cents.
-ERD50