Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
IRA-401k Trap :)
Old 05-18-2014, 11:13 AM   #1
gone traveling
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 153
IRA-401k Trap :)

So how many discovered that the tIRA and more so the 401k is a trap for people who are big savers-investors and need to convert to Roth inorder to control later tax consequences?
LongPrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-18-2014, 11:26 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongPrime View Post
So how many discovered that the tIRA and more so the 401k is a trap for people who are big savers-investors and need to convert to Roth inorder to control later tax consequences?
It's a major theme here, we've had several recent threads on it. Do a search for "Roth Conversion" for more info. The problem is accentuated when one spouse dies and the remaining spouse is still subject to the same RMDs but reduced standard deduction/reduced personal exemption, and the much lower brackets of Single vs MFJ.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 12:13 PM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,374
To me it reinforces the need to be diversified, not only across asset classes but also across tax attributes (taxable, tax-deferred and tax-free).

That said, I'm glad that I have a lot of tax deferred savings. I was solidly in the 25-28% marginal bracket or more when I was working and if I manage Roth conversions right should be in 15% land for most withdrawals, so I'm coming out ahead by a bunch. Worst case, if one of us dies, we'll pay taxes about equal to what we saved during accumulation so its not a huge problem IMO.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 12:13 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,903
Uncle Sam says, "You can pay me now, or you can pay me later."
GrayHare is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 02:43 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
RetireAge50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,660
For the most part paying later is better as they will probably take between zero and 15% instead of a for sure 25% or more (in our case).
RetireAge50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 03:05 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,228
I've heard a couple people complaining that they will be in a higher bracket withdrawing from their 401K/IRA than while earning, but I'm guessing not too many people maxed out their 401K while in the 15% bracket.

I also don't view Roth conversion as a "need" but rather a nice tool to smooth out income over my retirement. Certainly not a "trap". Looking at old tax tables, I find that I was almost always in the 30+% bracket except for the late 80s, and I don't see how I'll exceed 25% in retirement.

I think the common advice here has been to take full advantage of your employer 401K match, if they give one. After that max out a Roth IRA. After that you may want to invest in a taxable account with tax efficient investments such as index funds, and stick to long term capital gains, though if you are in a high bracket maxing out your 401K almost always makes sense.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 03:10 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
Something tells me that the OP has a product to sell that is a "solution" to this problem.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 03:16 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,903
The 401k employer match is free money and probably always worth doing. The potential tax trap area for big savers arises when adding to a 401k beyond the employer match.
GrayHare is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 03:51 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,242
I do not see it as a 'trap'... I am well aware of the future tax liability and plan for it accordingly....

In the end, I will save many 10s of thousands of dollars in taxes... so I do not see how it can be a trap....

I would say that the only people who get trapped are the ones who do not plan...
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 03:53 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum View Post
I've heard a couple people complaining that they will be in a higher bracket withdrawing from their 401K/IRA than while earning, but I'm guessing not too many people maxed out their 401K while in the 15% bracket.
As a lifelong LBYM'er I maxed out my 401k contributions while in the 15% tax bracket for many years. My DW and I slid into the 25% bracket for a few years, however this was offset by college costs for three kids. Now she has retired to take care of this tax problem.
We also maxed out our Roth contributions.
Now we could very well find ourselves in a higher tax bracket in retirement - but I'm not complaining.
__________________
Took SS at 62 and hope I live long enough to regret the decision.
foxfirev5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 04:09 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud View Post
I do not see it as a 'trap'... I am well aware of the future tax liability and plan for it accordingly....

In the end, I will save many 10s of thousands of dollars in taxes... so I do not see how it can be a trap....

I would say that the only people who get trapped are the ones who do not plan...
+1. I don't see it as a trap at all. I think it is highly unlikely we will be in as high a tax bracket when we are 70 and have to take out our RMDs than when we were younger and both had full time IT jobs, especially adding in state income tax.
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 05:47 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover View Post
Something tells me that the OP has a product to sell that is a "solution" to this problem.

Gee, ya think?

Personally, if this is a trap I have been hammering on the door for 20 years to get in. I will save six figures easily by jumping into this so-called "trap."
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 06:03 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayHare View Post
Uncle Sam says, "You can pay me now, or you can pay me later."
Yes. I take "later", please.

Is it not like we all have to die sooner or later, but the later the better, oui?

OK, just kidding as the analogy is not quite apt.

I can see myself being in a bit of a tight spot, if I do not have quite a bit of after-tax savings to live on until I can get my IRA and 401k penalty-free, and I do not like the 72t options.

On the other hand, while one has to pay taxes at some point, the tax-deferred nature of 401k and IRA has the advantage of "income smoothing", hence "tax smoothing", between the working and retiring phases of life.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 07:36 PM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud View Post
I do not see it as a 'trap'... I am well aware of the future tax liability and plan for it accordingly....

In the end, I will save many 10s of thousands of dollars in taxes... so I do not see how it can be a trap....

I would say that the only people who get trapped are the ones who do not plan...
I totally agree, I do not see it as a trap. In our case, for many years we assumed we would retire to a lower (than 28%) tax bracket, so we utilized tax deferred 401ks and spousal IRAs heavily. Now at 57, it is becoming clear that we will likely retire to a similar tax bracket as when we were working due to some rental investments that are doing quite well.

So... now we will likely pay taxes on these deferred accounts at a similar tax rate. It seems to me that it is still better to have had the use of those deferred tax $$ over the years, and pay the taxes later. If one somehow knew one would retire to a higher tax bracket, that might be a different story.

But I don't see the value of converting to Roth in my situation, unless I am missing something?
__________________
Best!
-AJ
ajs56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 07:54 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,019
Another benefit for DW and I is that without the 401k contributions reducing out income, our income would have been too high to be eligible to contribute to a Roth. That's probably true for many others.
Which Roger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 09:41 PM   #16
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cocoa Beach
Posts: 414
I don't see it as a "trap"?
I max out my 401k annually (get a 9% employer match, use a ROTH within it (just started to use this year and will fill the +17K max), and fill the rest up to the after-tax +50K limit.
Save everything else available into taxable accounts.
Will use the taxable accounts to support us from 2017 to 2027 (retiring at age 50) while doing ROTH conversions within the 401K.
Use the 401K to support us from 2027 onwards.
How could it be considered to be a "bad" thing?
Lucantes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 10:13 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajs56 View Post
But I don't see the value of converting to Roth in my situation, unless I am missing something?
Something to consider, and a possible reason to convert some money to a Roth: Take a quick look to see what the situation would be like for you (or your spouse) if the other were to pass away after age 70. Look at the RMDs, SS, pensions, etc, then at the tax brackets, standard deduction, etc for a single person. If the couple is MFJ and near the top of the 15% bracket, a single surviving souse can find herself well into the 25% bracket--paying 10% more taxes on the RMDs and also losing all the zero-tax CG and dividends--it can be a big hit. This can be one reason to pay taxes now to convert tIRA funds to a Roth IRA, even at the same tax rate--to lower the RMDs for the surviving spouse and provide a pot of taxes-already-paid money if that person would be in a higher bracket.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sell me the solution.
Old 05-18-2014, 11:14 PM   #18
gone traveling
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 153
Please sell me the solution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover View Post
Something tells me that the OP has a product to sell that is a "solution" to this problem.
In 2008 and in 2012 , when we bought and transfered tIRA annuities, I didn't give much thought to RMA or conversions because it was 10-5 years ahead, and I was more focused on preserving the funds. Now, with the run up in the stock market, I too am looking a conversion. We did some in 2013. FA advised us to not to do anymore without careful analysis .

The other issue is that I have some loser stock in tIRA. I don't get any tax benefit from losses vs a taxable situation if I increase the tIRA in good stock selection.

Since this is a free forum, I hope to get some free ideas.
travelover, can you please sell a free idea or one that I can beat the system.
LongPrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 06:10 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongPrime View Post
............travelover, can you please sell a free idea or one that I can beat the system.
Ask again when you have as many posts as I do.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 07:12 AM   #20
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
Something to consider, and a possible reason to convert some money to a Roth: Take a quick look to see what the situation would be like for you (or your spouse) if the other were to pass away after age 70. Look at the RMDs, SS, pensions, etc, then at the tax brackets, standard deduction, etc for a single person. If the couple is MFJ and near the top of the 15% bracket, a single surviving souse can find herself well into the 25% bracket--paying 10% more taxes on the RMDs and also losing all the zero-tax CG and dividends--it can be a big hit. This can be one reason to pay taxes now to convert tIRA funds to a Roth IRA, even at the same tax rate--to lower the RMDs for the surviving spouse and provide a pot of taxes-already-paid money if that person would be in a higher bracket.
Thanks very much for the reply samclem. I had not considered this scenario at all. So... the main change in the event of one of us passing with respect to this discussion is the switch from MFJ tax tables to single tax tables, correct? We are in the 25% bracket now and will liklely be similar at age 70, but I will look to see where within that bracket we are.
__________________
Best!
-AJ
ajs56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speed Trap listings for your area here! Orchidflower Other topics 16 12-07-2007 10:39 PM
Avoiding the middle-management trap soupcxan Young Dreamers 24 05-13-2005 03:41 AM
Book report:  The Two-Income Trap Nords Other topics 38 04-06-2005 12:57 PM
The DBP Trap JonnyM Hi, I am... 12 11-20-2004 07:59 AM
Is Academia A Loan TRAP? Tommy_Dolitte Young Dreamers 34 08-25-2004 08:11 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.