Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
When to coast?
Old 06-12-2015, 12:49 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,069
When to coast?

I'm 37, planning to stop saving heavily at 40 and let compounding do the work while I either dial back work or dial up spending or both.

For others planning similar, how are you analyzing the numbers to decide when and how much you need?

Assumption, retirement funds go untouched, or slightly added to until some full retirement day in the 10-25 year future.


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
dallas27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-12-2015, 01:46 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallas27 View Post
I'm 37, planning to stop saving heavily at 40 and let compounding do the work while I either dial back work or dial up spending or both.

For others planning similar, how are you analyzing the numbers to decide when and how much you need?

Assumption, retirement funds go untouched, or slightly added to until some full retirement day in the 10-25 year future.
I guess I kind of did this by going part-time my last few years. I was probably already FI by then, but I wanted some padding, especially since I didn't have a full handle on non-annual possible expenses like major home repairs, nor was I very certain about health care insurance. I continued to max out my retirement and dipped into my taxable account a bit if I had to, since that was plentiful.

Those years turned out to be pretty flat in the market, so compounding didn't work very hard for me. Hopefully you'll do better. Don't forget that inflation is compounding your future expenses at the same time. Hard to forecast 10-25 years in the future plus another 20-30+ years in retirement beyond that. My take is that it's best to save whatever you can while not depriving yourself if possible, track expenses, predict retirement expenses, and as you get close you start making an exit plan. I just don't think there's any way you can calculate with confidence that in 18 years you're going to have $X and need $Y annually so saving $Z annually now is exactly what I need to do.

As far as dialing up spending, if you've been very stingy I'd say go for it, but otherwise it can be harder to dial it back down again if you have to for retirement. Might be best to stay with a LBYM lifestyle, but like I say I don't know your situation.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 01:52 PM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 898
It happened to us unintentionally.
We used to save quite a big chunk (probably about 40% take home at the peak), but then our priorities involving kids changed.
We gave up DW's salary and bought a house in a much better school district.
NW still goes slightly up (I'm maxing out 401k and mortgage principal payments also increase NW), but I'm anticipating augmenting our cash flow from my after-tax savings for next few years (until youngest one is out of Montessori school).

We certainly do not have enough to ER (little less than half way there).
We used financial calculators (Firecalc, I-ORP, Fidelity RIP, Quicken Lifetime planner and probably few other) to find out how much of savings we needed to support annual spending we wanted, but what happened to us is that our wants/needs increased with 3 of our kids (for planning purposes it came roughly to 25% increase if you discount inflation).

Why do you want to slow down? Are you in a stressful job?
Compounding might not be as good as it was in the past.
sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 02:47 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nash031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bonita (San Diego)
Posts: 1,795
I just turned 38. We're anywhere from 35-50% towards our number saving more than 40% of our gross income for retirement. I have no intention of "coasting" in your terms for a few reasons:

(1) I have no control over my returns other than to set my asset allocation, but I do have control over how much principal I put in. Thus, buying more shares of XXX and YYY virtually assures that whatever return I get will be magnified and increases the likelihood that I'll reach FI and RE as early as possible.

(2) I intend to increase my savings rate proportionally with my salary as well as allow a little bit more spending. Stopping the savings to increase spending somewhat means that I'll become accustomed to spending at a higher level going into retirement. That seems counterproductive to me. I'd rather settle into a spending level that allows me to live comfortably, travel well and frequently, and sleep well at night. YMMV: if you want to spend more while you're working and "live now", have at it. You're certainly not alone.

In short, increasing spending, decreasing savings, and relying on compounding may not be a road to financial ruin, but it increases the degree of difficulty and cracks the door ever so slightly to a few failure modes unnecessarily IMO. I'd rather err on the side that potentially leaves me with a lot MORE money than the side that potentially leaves me with less. So no, I don't intend to financially "coast" until I'm retired or no longer working full time, at least.
__________________
"So we beat to our own drummer in the sun;
We ask for nobody's permission to run.
I just wanna live in a world like that;
Now I'm gonna live in a world like that!" - World Like That, O.A.R.
nash031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:02 PM   #5
Full time employment: Posting here.
Whisper66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 957
My DW and I continued to save throughout my career. Never actually "coasted" but clearly got less frugal as money was more plentiful. Saving for the future was always a key objective. The issue that kept us saving was an uncertain future. One obvious concern was if I lost my job (single family income) and couldn't get a similar well paying role to replace it. Another was we had several children growing up. Never know if they will need significant financial life time assistance until they actually grow up and get out on their own two feet. Also didn't want to be left exposed to financial disaster if my DW or I had serious health issues. So we continued to save a pretty significant amount until retirement. Turned out well for us because I decided to retire a few years earlier than planned and the savings were there to support that decision.

Having said all that, life is for living. So if there are really things you want to do, I'm all for doing them. Just make sure you consider the possible consequences of not saving and be happy with the decisions you make.

Good luck with whatever you decide!
Whisper66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:27 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,401
I saved money right up until ER. In fact, when I became FI, I was morivated to save even more, and to evaluate expenses more critically. I wanted to be sure that my LBYM lifestyle was doable long term without feeling deprived.
Meadbh is offline   Reply With Quote
When to coast?
Old 06-12-2015, 05:57 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,069
When to coast?

So you all trust firecalc during accumulation and drawdown phases, but not to "coast?"

The way i calculate it, i want to get to 50% of target, then stop saving. I expect in 10-15 i will still save a little along the way, but only work enough to do the things i wish to do. Wake up one day 10-15 years later with retirement fully funded. Could it be faster or slower, sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
dallas27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 06:15 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallas27 View Post
So you all trust firecalc during accumulation and drawdown phases, but not to "coast?"
I do not recall mentioning Firecalc. Mathematical tools are decision aids, not prescriptions.
Meadbh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 06:31 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
MRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,078
I had the same idea at about 42 then Y2K happened. I had the same thoughts 8 years later till '08. I'm glad I kept saving till I retired. YMMV.
MRG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 06:44 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRG View Post
I had the same idea at about 42 then Y2K happened. I had the same thoughts 8 years later till '08. I'm glad I kept saving till I retired. YMMV.

Starting from the peak of 2000 to now has a real return of about 2% annum. At that rate i would hit my target on time, although at very low end of my acceptable range. Thank you for suggesting that period, makes me a lot more confident.


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
dallas27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 06:52 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nash031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bonita (San Diego)
Posts: 1,795
I don't know when FIREcalc was brought into this. It has nothing to do with my decision to coast or not. Simply put, I want to achieve FI ASAP with as few uncontrollable variables as possible. Once I'm there, I will evaluate reducing savings, loosening purse strings, etc. but I have no intention of coasting into that point.
__________________
"So we beat to our own drummer in the sun;
We ask for nobody's permission to run.
I just wanna live in a world like that;
Now I'm gonna live in a world like that!" - World Like That, O.A.R.
nash031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 06:54 PM   #12
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum View Post
As far as dialing up spending, if you've been very stingy I'd say go for it, but otherwise it can be harder to dial it back down again if you have to for retirement. Might be best to stay with a LBYM lifestyle, but like I say I don't know your situation.
Agreed. You can LBYM while still budgeting for some fun money for things you enjoy (be it travel, golf, books, gadgets, etc). Sure, it's nice to be able to retire early but what if you never get to the finish line?
hnzw_rui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 07:15 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
The last 5 years I was content with simply maxing the 401k and.collecting the match.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 07:38 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallas27 View Post
So you all trust firecalc during accumulation and drawdown phases, but not to "coast?"

The way i calculate it, i want to get to 50% of target, then stop saving. I expect in 10-15 i will still save a little along the way, but only work enough to do the things i wish to do. Wake up one day 10-15 years later with retirement fully funded. Could it be faster or slower, sure.
I never mentioned firecalc either, but now that you have, I don't think it's a tool for accumulation, is it? Been awhile since I ran it, but I don't recall any such option. Did you use it in your calcs for coasting?

It's your life, live it how you like. Your plan might work. Too many variables for me to say. I'll butt out since you didn't seem to like or appreciate my answer.

edit: I guess Firecalc does have a Future Retirement option. I may have used it when I was 95% or so there, but I'd have less confidence using it for coasting or accumulation if I was many years away.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 08:40 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
growing_older's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,657
I had a similar plan to consider a semi-ER at 40 or put in just a couple more years and firmly retire at 42-43. Then an unexpected divorce scuttled all those plans and a couple market setbacks squashed what was left of the accounts. Now my plan is LBYM and focus on saving until I actually do have enough to ER. Too many ways for a less focused plan to fall apart.
growing_older is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 09:29 PM   #16
Full time employment: Posting here.
cooch96's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lakewood
Posts: 916
I think you have the right idea, Dallas. Once I'm at Stage 1 ER (I believe you were the guy to call it that), I plan on asking megacorp to put me on at part time (3.5-4.5 days per week).

I figure there's a 1% chance I'll get canned outright, a 9% chance they'll actually agree to the idea, and a 90% chance they'll laugh in my face and tell me to go back to work. If I get put on part time at a reduced salary, then I'd continue saving a bit but spending more on my days off at the range or ski slopes or whatever. If I get canned, I'll look for a better job (closer to home, lower stress, almost certainly lower pay) while collecting unemployment. And for the most likely course of action, I'll definitely let myself enjoy some big purchases: new rig, home remodel, etc, while the nest egg grows with just dividends and maxing out Ira and 401k contributions. I feel those are all versions of coasting.

In the meantime, I'll keep my ears open and keep handing out my resume (2 call backs in 10 months).
__________________
Why be normal when you can be yourself?
cooch96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 06:46 AM   #17
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadbh View Post
I saved money right up until ER. In fact, when I became FI, I was morivated to save even more, and to evaluate expenses more critically. I wanted to be sure that my LBYM lifestyle was doable long term without feeling deprived.
+1

I felt FI (could coast) as soon as portfolio dividend yield of 2.2% was higher then our current expenses.

But in retirement we will need to pay for Medical Insurance so our expenses will go up. Hence we continue to LBYM to increase portfolio for few more years.
eta2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 08:28 AM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by eta2020 View Post

I felt FI (could coast) as soon as portfolio dividend yield of 2.2% was higher then our current expenses.
In my models, I would consider that a failure to discount money against time properly. 2% would result in years wasted working.
dallas27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 08:53 AM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Lakewood90712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallas27 View Post

Assumption, retirement funds go untouched, or slightly added to until some full retirement day in the 10-25 year future.
IMO , 10 year and 25 year time horizon is apples to oranges. Large corrections, along with recovery is almost assured during both, but I would have a lot less confidence using the 10 year assumption. Other than those issues, It could indeed work.
Lakewood90712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 09:38 PM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,027
This is a really interesting strategy. I am not gutsy enough to try it however. I am the sole bread winner in our household, and I'm not completely clear about what kid expenses will be in the future.

My only concern would be that if I stop saving and eventually make more money I would be spending more money. If I get used to spending more, then my original estimate is way too low...
If you set a spending cap then it might work. Any income above a certain level would go to investments.
NgineER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cover your ears...coast to coast freebird5825 Other topics 13 03-17-2009 07:23 PM
This is one nasty east coast storm dumpster56 Other topics 9 04-16-2007 01:16 PM
Social Security if you coast last few years Rich_by_the_Bay FIRE and Money 21 02-25-2007 12:29 AM
"Beautiful Bellingham, on Washington's Coast" Ed_The_Gypsy FIRE and Money 1 03-07-2006 09:40 PM
Before & after pics of MS Coast Dawg52 Life after FIRE 6 03-02-2006 07:22 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.