2 Different Spending Models but Same Result...What Up?
I am toying with our friend FireCalc & thinking I must be doing something wrong.
I am comparing a 100,000 constant annual spending rate with a manual spending rate (100,000 for 2 years, 130,000 for next 6 years, then returning to 100,000). Both methods (no other entry changes) are indicating the exact same success rate (80.2%) & average remaining portfolio.
Any thoughts on what would prevent these from yielding different results?