Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Firecalc bug?
Old 12-06-2006, 10:20 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 174
Firecalc bug?

entered these parameters into advanced FC:

Portfolio -- 100% S&P-500, 1 million
start retirement in 2018

plan ends in 40 years -- SWR is 64,951 for 100% success

plan ends in 45 years -- SWR is 72,666 for 100% success

Seems implausible that the longer plan should heve the higher WD . . .

jeff2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: Firecalc bug?
Old 12-06-2006, 12:15 PM   #2 Founder
Developer of FIRECalc
dory36's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,824
Re: Firecalc bug?

If you select "End-of-year portfolio balances (text)" you will see that retirements starting in ~1961 - ~1965 failed, while others succeeded, when using your figures and a $65,000 withdrawal rate.

Those would not be picked up by a 45 year retirement because there were not 45 years of data available starting after ~1961, so the last cycle tested would have started in about 1960.

By the way -- your input implies you are investing a million today and letting it grow until 2018, not that you hope to get to 1 million by 2018. You probably realize this, but others might not.

Often uninformed, seldom undecided.

Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. Mark Twain
dory36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Firecalc bug?
Old 12-06-2006, 05:08 PM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 174
Re: Firecalc bug?

Hi, Dory -- thanks very much for the explanation. I understand what you're saying. Best regards . . .
jeff2006 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Firecalc slays a strawman, deceives many hankjoy FIRE and Money 46 11-30-2010 03:14 PM
Handling pensions and SS in Firecalc SecondCor521 FIRE and Money 5 04-19-2007 11:21 AM
FIRECalc data dumps or saved runs for referencing during posts? Nords FIRECalc support 6 01-25-2007 06:09 AM
dory36: old vs. new firecalc results? halo FIRECalc support 31 05-29-2006 09:31 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:00 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.