|
11-04-2018, 09:04 AM
|
#1
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
FireCalc question....
As I get closer to retirement (and more and more nervous!) I'm trying out many different scenarios on FireCalc. This time I tried putting in my pension and social security, which will come to about $40,000 per year together, and only put $10,000 in for my portfolio, to try to simulate having no portfolio. It gave a "100%" spending amount of $1,600 a year. That seems odd, considering I'll have a guaranteed income of $40,000 per year with the pension and social security.
Can anyone explain this to me?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
11-04-2018, 09:12 AM
|
#2
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,726
|
For pension and SS did you input monthly or annual amounts? FIRECalc looks for annual, not monthly.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:13 AM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
I put in annual amounts for each.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:21 AM
|
#4
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,726
|
Is the retirement date the same year as the SS and pension start dates? They also need to be in sync.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:29 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,110
|
Ah, Michael, that’s helpful! I noticed some weirdness with SS income as well, so I stopped including it and just added it into the max spend number it gave us. Not 100% kosher, as we’ll have several years without it if we ER, but a helpful data point.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:29 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,496
|
I think you ran into the issue described in this thread: Firecalc spending analysis
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...ad.php?t=93070
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged
"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
“There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:31 AM
|
#7
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
I've never put them in sync, just put in the actual dates of each even happening (retirement in 2019, SS starts in 2021, pension starts in 2020. I haven't seen anywhere that said they had to be in sync. I just assumed that FireCalc would make me take from my portfolio until I had the income from the pension, and then from the portfolio and the pension until SS starts. Is that a wrong assumption to make?
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:33 AM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: St. Charles
Posts: 3,919
|
FWIW, I just tried the same, and darned if I didn't get the same answer.
I used 10k portfolio, 20k pension (inflation adjusted), 20k ss, starting both in 2021, 30k spending and 30 year retirement. Investigate 100% success.
For kicks, I did a normal run, and it gave me 0% success.
I also re-ran my own numbers, and they look OK.
Something funky going on.
__________________
If your not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Never slow down, never grow old!
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:33 AM
|
#9
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,726
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CindyBlue
I've never put them in sync, just put in the actual dates of each even happening (retirement in 2019, SS starts in 2021, pension starts in 2020. I haven't seen anywhere that said they had to be in sync. I just assumed that FireCalc wold make me take from my portfolio until I had the income from the pension, and then from the portfolio and the pension until SS starts. Is that a wrong assumption to make?
|
There's a tab titled "not retired". The default retirement date is 2018, try changing it to 2019.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:39 AM
|
#10
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
Did that in my initial calculation...
I sure appreciate your responses - thank you for trying to help me figure this out!
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:42 AM
|
#11
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
I agree - I just read through the thread you sent me (thank you!) and it seems to be the same problem.
When I changed the portfolio to $100,000 it came out more to what I'd expect.
Edited to add: Whoops, I'd put in $1,000,000 - no wonder it came out well (smile!) I'm going back to try $100,000!
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:47 AM
|
#12
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
Just tried $100,000,and $200,000, and still am not up to the minimum that I'd be getting for just the SS and the pension...
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 09:49 AM
|
#13
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,362
|
Thread has been moved to the FIRECalc support forum.
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 10:37 AM
|
#14
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,726
|
So, trying to reproduce this issue. It happens when using the "Investigate" function and choosing "Search for settings that will get a success rate of as close to % as possible (usually within 1%) by changing..." It looks like it projecting a spending amount that is only portfolio and doesn't include the pensions. This is an error, I'll make sure to report it.
As a work-around, I would input my pension and SS amounts and dates, the retirement date, the minimum portfolio I expect, and then try different spending amounts to see where the 100% and 95% levels are. Then do the same with different portfolio levels. Change the portfolio, then look at different spending levels. It's a bit cumbersome but gets to the same result.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 01:44 PM
|
#15
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 807
|
Thank you for helping! I will try what you suggest, and I look forward to the fix (smile!)
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|