Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
mixed portfolio volatility assumptions?
Old 12-06-2010, 09:30 PM   #1
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
mixed portfolio volatility assumptions?

People who plug in their own asset allocation presumably have already picked a portfolio volatility. But it would be nice to have the program calculate its own number to verify it is treating the inputs as the user presumes.

Also be nice to ask it to give you a volatility range by making the optimum changes to the allocations which the user has input -- ie it would fine tune or re-balance the input portfolio.
__________________

__________________
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-07-2010, 12:31 AM   #2
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
I just did a run using Random Performance with a return of 7.5%, SD 15% and inflation 5%, to get a 2.5% overall growth rate.

The scenario has retirement starting in 13 years. The earliest failure is in about year 20. Eyeballing it seems to show a 50% chance of lasting at least to year 25, but almost 100% failure by year 30. Wish the program would actually give that data.

So somehow we need to evaluate the chance of the "new normal" reverting to "historical normal" in time to reverse the failure...

If we knew the portfolio value at whatever year the "historical normal" began again...

So can it be modified to change the market yield inputs in a given year?

From there it is trivial to allow numerous changes...
__________________

__________________
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 12:57 AM   #3
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
OK, I changed the input to 6.5% yield and 5% SD to simulate everything in bonds. That shows failure between about year 24 and 30. But the decline didn't start until the end of year 20.

There needs to be a horizontal line showing your starting money; this is hard to interpolate...

The worst loss is pretty much a horizontal line at about 27%.

So I could re-run starting in the year of the 'return to normalcy' using 83% of my actual money and see if it recovers or not. At least, by how much it delays the failure date.
__________________
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 01:07 AM   #4
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
OK, for the next 18 years there is 46% failure with Mixed, and 30% with a 65% stock : 35% 5 YR Treas.

Just to finish my example. So if there is a 20 year "generational long" New Normal of poor returns, there is a significant risk of failure even if you act 100% defensively now.

And of course I should run the 100% Defense numbers from the start, to see how long I have to recognize normal markets & switch over to prevent failure from low growth...

This is very interesting.
__________________
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 01:15 AM   #5
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Wow. 100% 30Yr Treas and 5% inflation worked 100% and I still have half my initial money under the mattress when I croak.

This is too easy... I must be doing something wrong, or Firecalc is making some bad assumptions about something...
__________________
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Mixed Portfolio? Sam FIRECalc support 35 08-12-2007 11:22 AM
Best Mixed Portfolio? Sam FIRE and Money 32 08-10-2007 06:46 PM
Best Portfolio to Achieve 8% Annualized Return with Low Volatility Bailing-Bob FIRE and Money 47 01-15-2007 08:10 PM
Mixed portfolio data set - allow change of starting year? wasdana FIRECalc support 0 08-12-2006 04:10 PM
Volatility in your Portfolio ESRBob FIRE and Money 5 03-03-2005 10:09 AM

 

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.