Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation
Old 08-20-2006, 08:46 AM   #1
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 18
Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation

Can the group please share with me the thoughts on running FireCalc with actual asset allocation vs. the Monte Carlo method.

In what ways is one superior/inferior to the other?

Is one method considered any more accurate than the other?

Thanks
al4trade is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation
Old 08-20-2006, 12:35 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa
Posts: 3,588
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation

Neither will predict the future.

Stock, bond and inflation results are correlated to each other and to the recent past in complex ways that cannot be captured by mathematical formula. Historical simulation gets around this problem by simply using real data. Whatever the correlation was, historical simulation captures it. Monte carlo simulation typically ignores the correlations or, at best, provides a poor approximation of some of the relationships. Historical simulation is limited to asset classes that have been accurately tracked and tabulated for 130 years. This is a serious limitation if you want to invest in real-estate, commodities, small-caps, . . . or anything other than the S&P 500 and bond indexes. Monte Carlo simulation can take whatever historical returns are currently available, assume the future will provide a similar distribution of returns and examine portfolios that include that asset class.

The best answer: Use both and try to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each. If they do not provide answers that are at least in the same ballpark, you or the simulation is doing something wrong. And getting in the ballpark is all either simulator is going to do as far as predicting your future.
sgeeeee is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation
Old 10-07-2006, 08:32 AM   #3
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 18
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation

Here's an article from Marketwatch comparing historical-based projections vs Monte Carlo.
http://tinyurl.com/gwgo7




Al4

(moderator shrunk URL)
al4trade is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation
Old 10-07-2006, 08:50 AM   #4
Early-Retirement.org Founder
Developer of FIRECalc
dory36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,840
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation

The article compares monte carlo simulation with dependence on average rates of returns. The author says:
Quote:
Way back then, many of those Americans probably calculated how much they could withdraw from their retirement accounts using historical rates of return as their guide, the ones that show that large-company stocks gaining on average 10% per year since 1926, small-company stocks gaining 12%, bonds gaining nearly 6%, and U.S. Treasury bills gaining 3.7%.
In fact, historical simulation (instead of averages) with a start year of 1926, as he suggests, gets a safe withdrawal rate of about 3.5% (depending on your allocation), not the much higher 6-8% he uses.

His point is good -- a simulation that addresses volatility beats using averages. But monte carlo misses the correlations that sgeeee pointed out.
__________________
Often uninformed, seldom undecided.

Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. Mark Twain
dory36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation
Old 10-07-2006, 09:45 PM   #5
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
Re: Monte Carlo vs. Asset Allocation

Dory,

This article was also posted by FundAlarm's "Ted" and I made some comments over there (before seeing it again over here). One of the other posters responded at length and in part: "Thanks particularly for your update on FIRECalc. I examined it many years ago and was unimpressed with its sophistication or methodology. Based on your comments I plan to revisit that tool."

FundAlarm's owner, Roy Weitz, was impressed with the exchange. If you send him an e-mail about the new version then he may write it up in his "Highlights & Commentary" article that he publishes at the beginning of each month. It's widely read and he's always looking for fresh material...
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
Asset Allocation


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asset Allocation: Effective but not feasible? Hillbilly FIRE and Money 20 04-28-2007 10:02 PM
Asset Allocation Question - Deferred Compensation b3bobster FIRE and Money 1 11-06-2006 03:51 PM
Retiree Asset Allocation WilliamG FIRE and Money 37 08-29-2006 10:14 PM
Asset Allocation AV8 FIRE and Money 17 02-25-2006 07:13 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.