![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Recycles dryer sheets
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 112
|
W/O SS still 4.27% SWR
Hello, I was running firecals and discovered that the withdrawal rate does not change with or without SS. For example; Principal 750,000, withdrawal 33,000 with a 66.3 percent success rate. At a 4.27 percent withdrawal rate.
Principal 750,000, withdrawl 33,000, SS 11,000. This is 100 percent success rate. With a 4.27 withdrawal rate. Can some one explain? Thanks runnerr |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator Emeritus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 11,515
|
Re: W/O SS still 4.27% SWR
Need more information on the version of FIRECalc you are using (Advanced?) and all the inputs/settings for both the with and without SS runs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Recycles dryer sheets
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 112
|
Re: W/O SS still 4.27% SWR
I forgot to add that I was under the assumption that a 4% withdrawal rate was considered a safe rate. 750,000 x .04 = 30,000. That along with 11,000 should = 41,000. What is up with that? I realize it is just an assumption.
runnerr |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Recycles dryer sheets
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 112
|
Re: W/O SS still 4.27% SWR
The advanced version and the only two input boxes I changed was expenses, 32,00 which I kept the same through both examples. The other box was SS. One example I added 11,000 starting in 2011 the other I entered 0. Success rate went from 100% with to 66.3% without SS. But the percentage of the with drawl rate remained the same at 4.27% How can it remain the same with SS if I am reducing the withdrawal rate by 11,000 to equal the original expenses of 32,000.
If the withdraw rate was to remain the same and I was still taking 32,000 before SS then when I started collecting SS my monies for expenses should rise to 41,000. Which I forgot to post in the original posting. Thanks Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator Emeritus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 11,515
|
Re: W/O SS still 4.27% SWR
In both cases FIRECalc results say:
"Your plan is to spend $32,000 a year, or 4.27% of your starting portfolio." This is correct in that you start with a $750,000 portfolio in both runs. In the SS version you don't start withdrawing until four years after your "starting portfolio", which has no impact on the initial withdrawal percentage. It does decrease your withdrawal rate at the four year point and the result is an improved success rate. I show a 100% success rate for the run with SS and a 91.5% success rate for the run without SS. In terms of the 4.27% SWR rule of thumb, I'd say those numbers aren't outside what you would expect them to be. The devil is in the details... ![]() EDIT: Of course the information Dory posted 6 seconds after I hit the enter key might be more accurate than my infomation. He did write the program after all. But I stand by my "devil is in the details" comment. 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Early-Retirement.org Founder
Developer of FIRECalc ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,823
|
Re: W/O SS still 4.27% SWR
The adjustments affect the success rate, not the reported percentage of the portfolio it takes for you to live.
The percentage is the "base" percentage, showing how much you need to live on as a percentage of your portfolio. Without adjustments, all will come from your portfolio. Adjustments from SS and others will change the amount you need to withdraw from your portfolio, but the assumption is that you are still needing that 4% to live on.
__________________
Often uninformed, seldom undecided. Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. Mark Twain |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the S&P 500 the best data set to base our 4% SWR on? | Dorus | FIRECalc support | 9 | 08-12-2006 02:12 AM |
| Another SWR Question? | mb | FIRE and Money | 14 | 01-06-2006 08:55 AM |
| Implications of SWR | GDH | FIRE and Money | 13 | 10-26-2004 07:53 AM |
| SWR, terminal values, TIPS, I-bnds & comm paper | sgeeeee | FIRE and Money | 144 | 02-25-2004 04:35 PM |
|
Other
Social Knowledge
forum communities: Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 |