|
2016 Express Scripts & Caremark Drug Formulary Changes
08-06-2015, 01:17 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,174
|
2016 Express Scripts & Caremark Drug Formulary Changes
Express Scripts and CVS/Caremark have published their list of products that will be removed (excluded) from their 2016 drug formularies.
Link: Drug Channels: Here Come the 2016 PBM Formulary Exclusion Lists!
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-06-2015, 01:27 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,528
|
I just ordered the prescription that I use from CVS/Caremark a few minutes ago. I had no idea that they exclude certain drugs. I am glad to see that mine is not on that list.
|
|
|
08-06-2015, 01:42 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,509
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer
I just ordered the prescription that I use from CVS/Caremark a few minutes ago. I had no idea that they exclude certain drugs. I am glad to see that mine is not on that list.
|
most if not all HI has a drug formulary. This divides the drug world into several tiers with the worst being not covered. This was even true for me at megacorp and microcorp
|
|
|
08-06-2015, 02:11 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
|
It is interesting that there are several reasons to go first with generic drugs beyond just cost. One is the number of adds for lawyers that relate to bad happenings with non generic drugs, the idea becomes that by the time a drug gets generic most if not all bad things will have been seen and corrects (or even the drug removed from the market) because of the bad reactions. So beyond cost there is the reduction in the chance of bad reactions that generics make far less likely. (all the more reason to push back on your physician in favor of generic drugs as I do)
|
|
|
08-06-2015, 02:39 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,509
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by meierlde
It is interesting that there are several reasons to go first with generic drugs beyond just cost. One is the number of adds for lawyers that relate to bad happenings with non generic drugs, the idea becomes that by the time a drug gets generic most if not all bad things will have been seen and corrects (or even the drug removed from the market) because of the bad reactions. So beyond cost there is the reduction in the chance of bad reactions that generics make far less likely. (all the more reason to push back on your physician in favor of generic drugs as I do)
|
So if I get you right, other than cost another reason for using generics is that the original drug is that the original drug has been field tested ( used for years by patients) and corrections, removal, or other modifications have been made to the original drug and have gone into the formulation of the generic. So if you need drug X and there is no generic... you get drug X. If you need drug Z and there is a generic of drug Z called GZ. If cost was not a factor, you would buy GZ because it would not have the problems associated with the present formulation of Z?
My assumption is that the original drug co. makes mods to improve the drug or application of the drug during the exclusivity period and this gets wrapped up into the generics. But I could be wrong on this.
|
|
|
08-06-2015, 03:14 PM
|
#6
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 712
|
Yes, off patent drugs have been road-tested, but there is also a lot less money for the class-action lawyers in pursuing generic manufacturers!
|
|
|
08-06-2015, 07:00 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Huntsville, AL/Helen, GA
Posts: 6,002
|
The big news is that they excluded Viagra from the formulary--not that will affect me.
Since going on Medicare, I'm no longer using Express Scripts. A handful of doctors' samples might last someone a lifetime anyway.
|
|
|
08-06-2015, 07:14 PM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingybear
So if I get you right, other than cost another reason for using generics is that the original drug is that the original drug has been field tested ( used for years by patients) and corrections, removal, or other modifications have been made to the original drug and have gone into the formulation of the generic. So if you need drug X and there is no generic... you get drug X. If you need drug Z and there is a generic of drug Z called GZ. If cost was not a factor, you would buy GZ because it would not have the problems associated with the present formulation of Z?
My assumption is that the original drug co. makes mods to improve the drug or application of the drug during the exclusivity period and this gets wrapped up into the generics. But I could be wrong on this.
|
I guess I would say that if GZ and Z were the same drug then its a question of price. However in general the generic is cheaper that the branded drug even after the generics hit the market.
My main point is that you should push for a generic drug versus a drug still under patent since the longer time on the market would expose any problems that the drugs cause.
Quite often the " improvements" get new patents and reset the patent clock. One example in the statin area is to combine two drugs get a new patent and keep on trucking with money you are making.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|