Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Bifocals: Hold off as long as I can or just bit the bullet?
Old 06-06-2016, 12:34 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
YVRRocketSurgery's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 158
Bifocals: Hold off as long as I can or just bit the bullet?

The last time I went to see the optometrist about 2 years ago, she said I may want to start considering getting bifocals though I might be able hold off a bit longer. Over the last year, I'm occasionally struggle to focus reading on my phone close up, though all I do is flip my glasses up and problem solved.

Should I hold off another couple of years or just bite the bullet and get bifocals?
I'm turning 45 this year. When did you get bifocals?

"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around for a while, you could miss it."
YVRRocketSurgery is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-06-2016, 04:34 AM   #2
Gumby's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,214
Presbyopia set in when I was about 40. It started with an inability to read restaurant menus in dim light and progressively got worse. I've been using reading glasses ever since.

Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 05:48 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
RunningBum's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,719
I think I was in my early 40s. Long drive at night and had to pull out a map to take a detour in an unfamiliar city and couldn't read the highway numbers on the map. If you can read just fine without your glasses maybe you're fine unless it's a pain to flip them off.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:09 AM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 824
At 44, could no longer read without taking glasses off and read 6 inches from nose. In hindsight, I've no idea why I waited to get no line bifocals, foolishness of youth I guess.
RE2Boys is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:26 AM   #5
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 232
I have used progressive lenses since my mid-40s. I am under the impression that most folks use them these days rather than bifocals. For the vain among us, there's no line, so it's hard for anyone to tell we're wearing them.

More importantly, the prescription varies gradually, so it's a very natural vision correction.

The biggest disadvantage is that there is some distortion in the peripheral vision. I got used to it very quickly, so that now I turn my head without even thinking about it when I want to focus on something to the left or right.
Slow But Steady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:32 AM   #6
Recycles dryer sheets
Philliefan33's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 395
I got by from about age 45-49 just using reading glasses. I bought a pack of six cheaters from Costco and kept a pair at multiple key locations.

At age 50 I moved to progressive lenses. By then I need distance correction, and hadn't realized it. I adapted to the progressives after a week or two of adjustment. I still have to pay attention on staircases, though.
Philliefan33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:34 AM   #7
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 254
I recently had to fill out a form, with such small print that when I did my usual "hold it 12 away so I can read it"... well it was in focus but now too far to read (by anyone really, it was that small). I didn't have my readers with me as I wasn't expecting to need them, so I had to just wing it!

Yes it's time, progressives though will be my choice.
Aerides is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:45 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
braumeister's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,198
Originally Posted by Slow But Steady View Post
I have used progressive lenses since my mid-40s.
Me, too.
They were great. DW took about a week to get used to them, but I had no trouble at all.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:52 AM   #9
MichaelB's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the road again
Posts: 21,108
Glasses are no big deal. Being able to see and read clearly has always been my top priority. I used glasses for distance for many years, finally stopped when my cataracts were removed 2 years ago. The next day, of course, is when I started needing glasses to read. I buy inexpensive reader multipacks and have spares everywhere.

Besides, aesthetically speaking (in my case), glasses cannot detract from what is not already there.
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 07:20 AM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
DFW_M5's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,622
I went to progressives in my late 40s. Same as MichaelB, after cataract surgery, now only need reading glasses for close up, and nothing for distance. Very liberating.
Doing things today that others won't, to do things tomorrow that others can't. Of course I'm referring to workouts, not robbing banks.
DFW_M5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 07:26 AM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908
Same story. Get some progressives and see.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Early Retirement Forum mobile app
MRG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 07:34 AM   #12
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 315
Mine is actually tri-focal: far distance for driving (1), computer distance (2) and short distance for reading (3).

I did not realize I needed this until I received my first bi-focal from Costco. I could see far to drive (1) and read books (3), but I could not see the computer well. So, I went back to Costco and got a second pair for driving (1) and computer (2).

Both progressive. So no lines. I eventually learned how to rely on my first pair of glasses for 3 tasks.
fh2000 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 07:49 AM   #13
W2R's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 34,801
I got bifocals in my early 40's. They improved my vision considerably at that time. So, I'd recommend getting them if there is any room for improvement.

It took me less than a half day to adjust to them; be careful stepping off curbs or climbing stairs, the first day.

I am older now so I have gone through the bifocal stage, followed by the trifocal stage ($$$), cataract surgery, and now my only glasses are readers for near vision.

For me, as for many people that I know, multi-focals (progressives) were a complete disaster and a waste of a huge amount of money. I wore them for a year and never could adjust to them to the point that I could see. I'd suggest getting used to bifocals first, before trying them. Those who can wear multi-focals really like them, but in my case I felt like I was "conned" because I hated them so much.
"You can never cross the ocean until you have the courage to lose sight of the shore." - - - C. Columbus
W2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 07:53 AM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,157
My first bifocals were in my mid-late forties. I tried progressives but with my strong prescription I had just a thin vertical space in the center that was in focus and too much peripheral that was not in focus.

I thought it was very counter productive for me to give up any sharp vision so that people looking at me didn't see my bifocal line! That just goes against my personal policy of not caring what other people think.

In my early 50's I had to go to trifocals, the middle space is used for the computer screen, my car dashboard when driving and sometimes I use it for reading, depending on if I'm seated or lying down.

For a while frame styles were very small and it was hard to find frames that would accommodate trifocals with enough area where I needed it. Current styles are great for this, I just got new frames and trifocals and had plenty of nice options.

The only time that bifocals/trifocals just don't work for me is when sweeping/mopping/vaccuming a floor. I can only focus on the floor directly under me with the top visual space and to do that I have to crane my neck too far. So these tasks are just a little out of focus.
Married, both 61. DH retired June, 2010. I have a pleasant little part time job.
Sue J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 09:43 AM   #15
Recycles dryer sheets
Beldar's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 220
You may consider readers if you don't mind carrying and changing 2 pairs of glasses all the time (depends on your lifestyle of course).

I've had progressives for about 10 yrs and they are just find. Variable focus just by bobbing my head up and down...I must look like a drunk or stoner some times.

Seriously, try the simple fix (readers), and if that's too much of a hassle try the progressives. They DO take some getting used to but once thats done it's just second nature.

Old geezerdom

Beldar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 09:56 AM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
easysurfer's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,461
The 40's is the age I started to get bifocals also. At first, I thought, no way.. but then after finding myself squinting to see smaller print, I waved the white flag and surrendered.

Today's bifocals aren't all like your father's. They don't have to have that slit on the lens to show everyone that you wear bifocals. But for me, I like having a larger lens as after having a pair with a smaller lens, I was having trouble getting good focus...I think from either seeing too much on the bifocal area or outside of the entire lens.
Have you ever seen a headstone with these words
"If only I had spent more time at work" ... from "Busy Man" sung by Billy Ray Cyrus
easysurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 10:06 AM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Sunset's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,610
If you can read find without glasses, and just need them for distance, why change ?
Sunset is offline   Reply With Quote
Bifocals: Hold off as long as I can or just bit the bullet?
Old 06-06-2016, 10:09 AM   #18
Full time employment: Posting here.
RetireAge50's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 871
Bifocals: Hold off as long as I can or just bit the bullet?

If you have about $2k and 10 minutes they can fix your distance vision.
RetireAge50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 10:44 AM   #19
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 52
I've been near-sighted most of my life, and I couldn't ever read with my distance vision glasses on. I waited until I started having too much trouble reading small print to get progressive bifocals (at 53), and now of course wear my glasses a lot more. In my case, as I got older my distance vision improved, and my correction for distance vision has been reduced a few times.
niven is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 10:50 AM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 10,661
I started needing glasses at age 45, and I bought +1.25 glasses (not bifocals) from the optometrist when he examined my eyes. However, I never replaced them, and have relied on cheater/reading glasses for 18 years now. I gradually reached +2.50. I don't see any need to buy bifocals when cheaters are so much less. YMMV

However, I DID buy bifocal sunglasses for $60 - but they were online non-prescription, and they have served me perfectly well.

No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 60% equity funds / 35% bond funds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 2.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cat management bites the bullet REWahoo Other topics 5 12-23-2008 07:54 AM
Just Got My Rate Increase Notice. A Bit of Rant MJ Health and Early Retirement 19 09-15-2007 10:09 AM
Additions to budget: Bullet-proof vest and a case of mace MooreBonds Other topics 5 10-31-2006 04:14 AM
Save the Last Bullet for Yourself 2B Other topics 16 06-11-2006 12:02 PM
I'm Ready to Bite the Bullet- jackalope Life after FIRE 7 03-06-2004 12:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.