Cataract Surgery

[ShokWaveRider]

I did mine for reading and wear glasses to drive. I have done that all my like anyway so it seemed like a no brainer. I am not wearing glasses as I am typing this, so far so good. I spend a lot more time on my computer than I do driving. After 6 years all good.

 

[W2R]

I didn't mention why I chose the distance lenses instead of multifocal or monovision or toric lenses.

Multifocal: My surgeon and his office specialize in cataract surgery. They didn't push this option, and said that they had better results usually with other types of lenses. I had multifocal eyeglasses back in the 1970's and absolutely hated them; I have an unusually long neck, and I needed more fine muscle coordination in my neck than I have, in order to use exactly the right part of the multifocal lens to see whatever-it-is that I want to see. Since I hate multifocal glasses, it was easy for me to say "No!" to multifocal lens implants during cataract surgery.

A progressive lens in eyeglasses is nothing like the Tecnics IOL lens implanted for cataract surgery.

I'm sure. My surgeon was not a fan, though (see above). Like I said several times already, I'm glad you found a lens you like and people need to talk to the surgeon and look into what is right for them as individuals, not follow the crowd.

 

[bobandsherry]

I'm sure. My surgeon was not a fan, though (see above). Like I said several times already, I'm glad you found a lens you like and people need to talk to the surgeon and look into what is right for them as individuals, not follow the crowd.

Your surgeon was not a fan of Tecnis Symfony lens or multifocal in general? Asking as the Tecnis is a newer lens. My surgeon was not a fan of previous multifocal offerings. He has seen great results with Tecnis lens.

I likewise am glad that you found what works for you individually. But I did feel it important to correct misinformation you were sharing. But do agree that everyone needs to talk to their surgeon on options. But more importantly first find one that is skilled and also stays up on advances being made with IOL lens and techniques.

 

[Peter]

I gave careful consideration to the Tecnis symfony. What put me off were many reports on the web of halos and other artifacts at night. My surgeon did confirm that this was a possible side effect, although he left the final decision up to me.

So instead I went for what my surgeon calls 'blended vision'; this is like monovision, but the difference between the two lenses is quite small, 0.5 diopter in my case. This gives me 20/20 from distance down to about 3 feet. Computer screen is OK without glasses, iPhone very marginal. I confess that this is a bit inconvenient at times.

One thing I noticed after both eyes had settled down was that my perception of distance was much improved. The world is back to being a 3-D place! It seems that one of my eyes was so bad that my brain couldn't process its image with that from the other eye to give good depth perception.

 

[bobandsherry]

I gave careful consideration to the Tecnis symfony. What put me off were many reports on the web of halos and other artifacts at night. My surgeon did confirm that this was a possible side effect, although he left the final decision up to me.

So instead I went for what my surgeon calls 'blended vision'; this is like monovision, but the difference between the two lenses is quite small, 0.5 diopter in my case. This gives me 20/20 from distance down to about 3 feet. Computer screen is OK without glasses, iPhone very marginal. I confess that this is a bit inconvenient at times.

One thing I noticed after both eyes had settled down was that my perception of distance was much improved. The world is back to being a 3-D place! It seems that one of my eyes was so bad that my brain couldn't process its image with that from the other eye to give good depth perception.

Good example of why important for everyone to speak to their surgeon. What's good for one person may not be good for another. I'm sure you made right decision for you.

I read same information as you. Spoke to my surgeon and he said his experience has been very good with the lens. He also told me if it was him, he'd go with the the Tecnis.

I also considered that people usually only post things when they have something bad or to complain. This is reason I'm sharing my positive experience.

I do see a slight starburst from bright light at night, but in comparing description with my wife it's same as she experiences with her contacts. I don't have halos or other artifacts at night. And its much less intrusive than what I saw with same lights with my cataracts. And if I think back, it's also less intrusive as what I experienced after I had my LASIK many years ago.

I had my surgery on right eye two weeks ago and surgeon said there's a good chance I will improve over next few weeks as lens settles into place and eye heals. I will say I have noticed an improvement from last week. Had left eye done today so I'll see how that goes.

 

[Bestwifeever]

Your surgeon was not a fan of Tecnis Symfony lens or multifocal in general? Asking as the Tecnis is a newer lens. My surgeon was not a fan of previous multifocal offerings. He has seen great results with Tecnis lens.

I likewise am glad that you found what works for you individually. But I did feel it important to correct misinformation you were sharing. But do agree that everyone needs to talk to their surgeon on options. But more importantly first find one that is skilled and also stays up on advances being made with IOL lens and techniques.

I don’t see any misinformation in W2R’s posts, and as someone whose grandparent went blind from cataract surgery, she probably did a lot more research than 99 percent of the rest of us into finding a skilled surgeon who stays up on IOL advances and techniques. Good for you finding a lens and a doctor you are happy with, though.

 

[eytonxav]

Monofocal - I got this which was the cheapest way for me to correct my distance vision. I have not heard of too many that opt for this to correct for close-up, as reading glasses for that are cheap.

Monovision - This means getting a distance lens in one eye and a lens for closeup in the other. Not everyone is a candidate for this and you should try contacts for a few weeks to see if its an option for you.

Multi-focal - Seems there are more new options coming out yearly in this area that will allow for correction of both distance and closeup. It costs more, and may produce more starbursts at night than the other choices, and as I understand it, requires some eye training as well. I also was told that distance vision might be a little better with Monofocal vs the Multi-focal, and as a softball player, I did not want to compromise my distance vision.

 

[bobandsherry]

Multi-focal - Seems there are more new options coming out yearly in this area that will allow for correction of both distance and closeup. It costs more, and may produce more starbursts at night than the other choices, and as I understand it, requires some eye training as well. I also was told that distance vision might be a little better with Monofocal vs the Multi-focal, and as a softball player, I did not want to compromise my distance vision.

As one of the newest members of the Multifocal community, 2nd eye was done 2 days ago, you are right on cost. But at 56 I hope to have many years of enjoyment from them.

Just a couple points from my experience. I don't know about all multifocal lens, but with lens I chose there is no eye training required. There is nothing given up on distant vision either. Speaking to my surgeon he said my distant vision would be same with either choice. Perhaps not the case for everyone so def worth talking to their surgeon on options.

After wearing readers for the last 13 years, I was ready to dump them, worth the cost of admission for me. Nice to just pick up my phone and type this reply without looking for my readers. [emoji41]

 

[Amethyst]

With multifocal contact lenses, my brain and eyes did go through a brief period of learning to work together, to match the appropriate concentric ring on the lenses with the task at hand. Distance (driving) was intuitive; mid-range and close-up required some concentration, at first.

So perhaps this is the "eye training" you refer to.

Multi-focal - Seems there are more new options coming out yearly in this area that will allow for correction of both distance and closeup. It costs more, and may produce more starbursts at night than the other choices, and as I understand it, requires some eye training as well.

 

[bobandsherry]

With multifocal contact lenses, my brain and eyes did go through a brief period of learning to work together, to match the appropriate concentric ring on the lenses with the task at hand. Distance (driving) was intuitive; mid-range and close-up required some concentration, at first.

So perhaps this is the "eye training" you refer to.

Contacts and glasses operate that way, but no IOL lens. No distance between eye and lens so it's all seem less. Right after surgery I could see distant and near without any thought of brain to eyes, maybe that because I have no brains. [emoji41]

 

[eytonxav]

With multifocal contact lenses, my brain and eyes did go through a brief period of learning to work together, to match the appropriate concentric ring on the lenses with the task at hand. Distance (driving) was intuitive; mid-range and close-up required some concentration, at first.

So perhaps this is the "eye training" you refer to.

Possibly, one of my friends recently got multifocals and I believe he indicated he was given some exercises to speed up adaptation.

 

[bobandsherry]

Possibly, one of my friends recently got multifocals and I believe he indicated he was given some exercises to speed up adaptation.

Was that for contact lens or IOL lens for cataract replacement?

 

[eytonxav]

Was that for contact lens or IOL lens for cataract replacement?

IOL, not sure which brand he got.

 

[bobandsherry]

IOL, not sure which brand he got.

Interesting, thanks

 

[bobandsherry]

IOL, not sure which brand he got.

I had a follow-up today with my eye surgeon, I asked him about different multi-focus lens. The lens that my surgeon offers is a newer multi-focal, doesn't require any training as it's continuous vision. He did say that there are lens that would be like a step in each focal point. He doesn't offer this so he never discussed with me.

He had a chart that showed the differences. The lens I have is on top, it shows that it's just a smooth continuous transition from near to far. The other lens in the middle has designated focal points.

 

[TromboneAl]

My friend thanks you for your help. Her response:

Since the "near" vision is much worse than my "distance" vision, I am going to have my left eye near vision "corrected." This will allow me to read your books without glasses (hopefully?) and that's a good thing, isn't it? I will be able to read recipes and view the computer without reaching out for my glasses. However, the down side in that decision is that I cannot make out faces until they're practically right in front of me.

My optometrist still advocates a hybrid version - correct near in one eye and distance in the other. I'm still not sure about that but for now I'm going toward correcting my near vision.


I did view your links but what it comes down to is a very individual thing and that's what I've discovered after all my research.


Domo arigato gozaimasu for your assistance.​