I am 52 and in pretty good shape. For two months, persistent pain on the right side of my neck has interfered with my workouts, turning my head while driving, and working at my desk. Finally, I gave up and went to my primary physician. After many questions, and physically turning my neck this way and that, he opined I had muscle spasms, likely stemming from osteoarthritis in the cervical vertebrae, and sent me for X-rays.
Dr. called me with the good news that the radiologist's report came back "normal." Then he sent me to the physical therapist. I had my first PT session yesterday.
After many, many questions and manipulations of my neck, shoulder and arm, she opined that I have muscle spasms, likely stemming from osteoarthritis of the cervical vertebrae. When I said my neck X-rays were normal, she said "Normal doesn't necessarily mean you have no wear and tear. Some wear and tear is normal as we age, and you have classic osteoarthritic symptoms."
I don't get it. If there is wear and tear, age-related or not, shouldn't the radiologist report that to the Dr., and let the Dr. decide whether it's "normal" for his patient?
Dr. called me with the good news that the radiologist's report came back "normal." Then he sent me to the physical therapist. I had my first PT session yesterday.
After many, many questions and manipulations of my neck, shoulder and arm, she opined that I have muscle spasms, likely stemming from osteoarthritis of the cervical vertebrae. When I said my neck X-rays were normal, she said "Normal doesn't necessarily mean you have no wear and tear. Some wear and tear is normal as we age, and you have classic osteoarthritic symptoms."
I don't get it. If there is wear and tear, age-related or not, shouldn't the radiologist report that to the Dr., and let the Dr. decide whether it's "normal" for his patient?