Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2016, 08:32 AM   #21
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Sojourner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,581
A bit OT, sorry... but reading through this thread just makes me really despondent about the future of health care insurance and coverage in this country. What an incredibly byzantine, cryptic, confusing system we have. Just sayin'.
Sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-18-2016, 08:35 AM   #22
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,953
The huge number of threads running currently just about healthcare is what I find depressing. I'm 25 months from Medicare and I can't tell you what a relief it will be to me to not have to worry about this for myself.
ivinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 08:54 AM   #23
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
CaliKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Ex-Cali
Posts: 1,236
I can't speak to ACA plans but we have been covered by HMO plans for years and had excellent care. In the couple instances we wanted second opinions we have been able to get in to UCSF and Stanford without long delays. We are in Nor Cal and maybe it's different than So Cal but I am not aware of doctors refusing ACA plans up here.

As for the decision to move to the OC. Life is so good there you won't even need to worry about your medical insurance! Seriously, weather, food, outdoor activities, life is good in the OC!
__________________
______________________
The plan was September 1, 2022 and I am 95% there. Still working a few hours a week at the real job.
CaliKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 08:59 AM   #24
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShokWaveRider View Post

Besides what is wrong with Keiser?
Spelling?
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 09:08 AM   #25
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 712
Orange County's MemorialCare page:
Covered California Health Benefits Exchange Plan | MemorialCare Health System | Orange County | Los Angeles County

San Diego County's Scripps Clinic:
https://www.scripps.org/patients-and...red-california

San Diego County's Sharp Healthcare:
How to Choose Sharp HealthCare Through Covered California - San Diego
AllDone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 09:22 AM   #26
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,171
I live in San Diego. Myself and my sons are on Kaiser Permanente HDHP's bought through the exchange. Completely happy with the coverage. I've never had any issue getting referrals to appropriate specialists.

My husband is on a Sharp HMO plan (see link above by Alldone)... Also purchased on CoveredCA. Sharp is, I believe, a San Diego specific chain. Same with Scripps. But I suspect there are similar plans in the OC.

Kaiser Permanente is a different model than many insurance models... It's closed network. The doctors are employees (vs private practice). You go to a Kaiser owned facility, see their doctors, nurses, PAs, etc. I've had long talks with my kids' pediatrician about this model - she LOVES it. Her hours are more reasonable, she has coverage when she gets sick or goes on vacation, she is allowed to spend part of her time pursuing her passion (NICU babies) and the rest of the time in her peds clinic practice. We've used her for 14 years. My primary also says the model is great for work/life balance for the doctors.... I've had my primary, also, for 15 years.

My husband made the change to Sharp when his primary retired.... the doc who took over the patients hadn't quite perfected bedside manner (young doc, new employee) and pissed of DH.... That could happen in any insurance model.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
rodi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 09:34 AM   #27
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
The anecdotes are real and I think there's no disagreement. That does not mean they represent the California individual health insurance market. The discussion in this thread is "doctors vs ACA", when it really should he "some health insurers behaviour".

Two large insurers were accused by state regulators of overstating their provider networks in 2014 and 2015. In addition to fines and refunds they are also subject to legal action by policyholder. Their actions led to numerous complaints that physicians listed in the network weren't taking the insurance. Investigation by state regulators showed this to be a systemic practice. The LA Times has covered this in great detail. One article
Quote:
California regulators fined two insurance giants for overstating their Obamacare doctor networks and said the companies will pay millions of dollars in refunds to patients who paid too much for care.The state’s Department of Managed Health Care levied fines of $350,000 against Blue Shield of California and $250,000 for Anthem Blue Cross.
At issue were the companies’ error-riddled provider directories that frustrated many consumers statewide as they tried to find doctors during the rollout of the Affordable Care Act in 2014. As a result, some patients incurred big unforeseen medical bills because they unwittingly went out of network for care. California fines top health insurers for overstating Obamacare networks - LA Times
This issue has quieted down over the past year. That might mean it was resolved, or only the media losing interest. I suspect regulators scrutiny helped and insurers cleaned up their provider network representations. So, in response to the OP question, in California it appears that the key consideration is not whether doctors accept "ACA plans", it is whether the insurance networks include the providers.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 09:49 AM   #28
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,953
Wow 250 to 350 thousand dollars that will teach them to behave...the consumers had the refunds coming away due to the deceptions by the insurance companies..How about a little more bite to that penalty..that's just a slap on the wrist.
ivinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 09:51 AM   #29
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,405
Small practices choose what insurance to accept. Most large health care organizations chose to work with the insurance companies and accept the ACA coverage from the beginning and modified their business and medical practices accordingly.

Every year the insurance companies threaten to drop Sutter Health from their networks here because they are too expensive, i.e. they are more aggressive in treating medical conditions and in monitoring their patients than the cheaper mega providers. Every year a deal gets worked out because Sutter is too big a player to cut off. The mega providers are starting to get better control of the situation. The little practices can't make it work, so they decline to participate.

Whether it's on Nextdoor or in a social setting, I routinely hear the same stories about providers not being in network or not accepting exchange policies (or Medicare) and having to find new providers if they can. Nothing has changed, except the war between the insurance companies and the mega providers is becoming more sophisticated.
Another Reader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 09:51 AM   #30
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodi View Post
My husband made the change to Sharp when his primary retired.... the doc who took over the patients hadn't quite perfected bedside manner (young doc, new employee) and pissed of DH.... That could happen in any insurance model.
Can't a Kaiser patient request a new primary? My woman friend is covered in Seattle by Group Health, which has recently been acquired by Kaiser Permanente. She can request, and get, another doctor. Though there must be some controls or the docs who gave away the store would wind up with all the patients.

I think one thing in favor of a true HMO like Group Health or Kaiser has to do with specialists, especially surgeons. Surgery is like baseball, the more balls you take in batting practice, the better average you are likely to have in games. Many urban surgeons are under-employed, at least early in their careers, a time when their skills are likely near their max. In a big HMO, bad surgical outcomes other than death are likely to raise costs considerably. The managers really do not want this. Thus busy surgeons are likely to have better batting averages overall, and under-active surgeons are not part of an HMO business plan.

Ha
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 10:07 AM   #31
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
The insurers have lists on their sites of the doctors and hospitals that are in-network. We check these lists before signing up for Covered California insurance every year. One family member needs a certain specialist so we pick a different plan for him that has the specialist on the list. It does mean if he needs hospitalization he cannot go to the closest hospital which is under 5 miles but has to go to one that is 10 miles away. But both plans have well regarded hospitals on their lists and pretty wide doctor networks, though not every doctor and hospital is on every plan.

California is a big state. If it were a country in terms of economic output it would be equal to France. Even with a plan network of 1/8 the doctors in the state you might be getting a larger network than if you lived in a smaller state where every doctor accepted every plan. As others have said you would need to know the overall statistics - anecdotes will not give you a comprehensive picture.
__________________
Even clouds seem bright and breezy, 'Cause the livin' is free and easy, See the rat race in a new way, Like you're wakin' up to a new day (Dr. Tarr and Professor Fether lyrics, Alan Parsons Project, based on an EA Poe story)
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 10:21 AM   #32
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort View Post
California is a big state. If it were a country in terms of economic output it would be equal to France. Even with a plan network of 1/8 the doctors in the state you might be getting a larger network than if you lived in a smaller state where every doctor accepted every plan. As others have said you would need to know the overall statistics - anecdotes will not give you a comprehensive picture.
The question is, are those 1/8 doctors the top 1/8 or the bottom 1/8? Since insurance companies pick based on how cheap and how malleable providers are, my guess is the average of the 1/8 is below the median.
Another Reader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 11:16 AM   #33
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Another Reader View Post
The question is, are those 1/8 doctors the top 1/8 or the bottom 1/8? Since insurance companies pick based on how cheap and how malleable providers are, my guess is the average of the 1/8 is below the median.
How do you know if any doctor is in the top 1/8 or bottom 1/8 regardless of insurance? And top of what? What is your criteria?
__________________
Even clouds seem bright and breezy, 'Cause the livin' is free and easy, See the rat race in a new way, Like you're wakin' up to a new day (Dr. Tarr and Professor Fether lyrics, Alan Parsons Project, based on an EA Poe story)
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 11:31 AM   #34
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort View Post
How do you know if any doctor is in the top 1/8 or bottom 1/8 regardless of insurance? And top of what? What is your criteria?
For sure. I'd bet that half of them are below average.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 11:38 AM   #35
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover View Post
For sure. I'd bet that half of them are below average.
This is probably an old joke but it was new to me. A dental student friend asked me what do you call the person who graduates last in his dental class? The answer was a dentist.
__________________
Even clouds seem bright and breezy, 'Cause the livin' is free and easy, See the rat race in a new way, Like you're wakin' up to a new day (Dr. Tarr and Professor Fether lyrics, Alan Parsons Project, based on an EA Poe story)
daylatedollarshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 12:10 PM   #36
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
photoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Another Reader View Post
Every year the insurance companies threaten to drop Sutter Health from their networks here because they are too expensive, i.e. they are more aggressive in treating medical conditions and in monitoring their patients than the cheaper mega providers. Every year a deal gets worked out because Sutter is too big a player to cut off. The mega providers are starting to get better control of the situation. The little practices can't make it work, so they decline to participate.
(1) Is Sutter health more actually more aggressive in treatment plans by any quantitative measure? or is this a conclusion based on anecdote?

(2) Does that aggressive treatment actually lead to be better outcomes or just more billing? There are lots of examples in medical literature where treatments don't actually help long term outcomes but of course result in greater remuneration.

(3) Is Sutter health more expensive due to point #1 (more aggressive treatment)? Or is it simply due to less competition at the provider level and more aggressive negotation with insurance companies? CoveredCA claims the greater rate increases in Norcal is due to less provider competition and not more treatment for the same problem. Of course CoveredCA might be biased but their argument based on the relative numbers of providers in Norcal/Socal makes sense.
photoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 12:26 PM   #37
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Brat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,111
In Portland Metro there are two highly rated Medicare Advantage plans: Kaiser and Providence. Kaiser NW includes much of SW Washington and now has a clinic in Eugene.

One of the members of my 50+ dragon boat paddling club had a serious accident (riding a motorcycle!!) near Bellingham about a year ago. He is a Kaiser NW Medicare Advantage insured. Kaiser life-flighted him from near the CN border to Oregon Health Sciences University Hospital where he spent several weeks. Then he was moved to a Kaiser owned rehabilitation facility in Portland where he spent a month or so. His road rash gave him MERSA in his wrist which has been dealt with. He talked to a couple Kaiser ortho specialists and feels that the best that could be done has been done and will leave well enough alone. The paddler was a hospital lab (not Kaiser) manager before retirement and is in a position to evaluate his care. He is back paddling.

We are using Kaiser and we can select physicians in their group. Some specialists require a referral but that hasn't been an issue with us. In fact my internal medicine doc insists that I see a couple of specialists even when I am inclined not to bother. Now they call me to lasso me in. If you want glasses or hearing aids (which you can purchase with a co-pay at Kaiser) you must see an optician or audiologist first, sometimes with a couple week's wait. My husband likes a particular dermatologist who must be kicking 70 and is working part time. He has been offered others but says he will wait until her schedule is posted. She has quite a following, and an attitude, which makes husband's appointments interesting.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
Brat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 12:34 PM   #38
Moderator
rodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha View Post
Can't a Kaiser patient request a new primary?
Ha
They can - but he chose to bail to Sharp. I argued against switching because I prefer the Kaiser model. There are good doctors and bad doctors under any insurance model... he just hit a bad one and chose to change insurers, rather than doctors.
__________________
Retired June 2014. No longer an enginerd - now I'm just a nerd.
micro pensions 6%, rental income 20%
rodi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 01:10 PM   #39
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 26
Thank you to everyone for your thoughtful replies. At the very least, it sounds like it is far less certain in California that most any doctor or hospital will accept Covered Ca plans, although there certainly seems to be a wide variety that do. I guess the real test and challenge is that circumstance when you get a serious illness, and want the BEST care for that type of illness. One Boston hospital here, advertises that " Your doctor may have seen your type of cancer, but WE see it everyday!"
That is where I get nervous. What if your ideal specialist is at Cedar Sinai and you live in South OC?

Regarding Kaiser, I am curious, we do not have anything like them here. They are well rated on the Covered CA website, yet my sister while lives in CA, has story after story about people who were denied the care they needed, ( and one died).

I guess where my concern lies is not so much with the day to day, but the serious cases ( that we pray we never get). The fact that even " some" of the posters have had experiences where Drs do not accept Obamacare can make one nervous-
Salty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2016, 01:47 PM   #40
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Brat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,111
I have not come across anyone who has personal experience with a friend or family member who has been denied needed care by Kaiser. Back in the day I would hear of a friend of a friend whose aunt said... but back then the AMA was fighting the Kaiser model. Now if you think Laetrile is a cure for cancer (as did a co-worker) Kaiser probably is not the health care provider for you.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
Brat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BCBSTX Canceling PPO Plans for 2016 eytonxav Health and Early Retirement 63 12-01-2015 06:11 AM
Doctors not accepting Obamacare? jesaco Health and Early Retirement 80 11-18-2014 09:50 AM
Covered vs. Non-Covered Shares PERSonalTime FIRE and Money 3 07-06-2014 08:25 PM
"Charges not covered" Bikerdude Life after FIRE 27 11-26-2007 09:55 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.