Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Getting dumped by my healthcare provider
Old 06-24-2013, 04:33 PM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 944
Getting dumped by my healthcare provider

Got a letter today from Aetna that as of 12/31/13 - my family is on it's own....I had a feeling this would happen. Aetna was not part of the California Care program - this makes me sick and nervous.....I've been sending big $ to Aetna for years - over $1100 for the last couple years - starting at $360 7 years ago.
I am being pushed out and not sure where we will end up for sure....I will have some sleepless nights. I like having everything set up and this is a big "what if" for me.
I always feared that HC would be the wildcard in ER - anyone out there have a vicodin? Any words of wisdom - and a vicodin.
__________________
Freed at 49. You only live once - live it
Donzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-24-2013, 04:38 PM   #2
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Have you looked at the Covered Cal website yet? Individual and Family Health Insurance | Covered California?
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 04:40 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,431
Donzo,

Welcome to a Health Exchange...coming to your neighborhood soon. Starting Jan. 2014....http://www.healthexchange.ca.gov/Pages/Default.aspx

omni
omni550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 06:37 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gauss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,594
Donzo,

Getting dumped by your health care provider will have very different consequences than in the past.

Under PPACA (aka Obamacare) if you are in the individual market, starting in 2014
- insurer's will not be allowed to deny you coverage
- rates will not be allowed to vary based on your medical conditions

- rates will only be allowed to vary based on:
1 Age (max 3:1 ratio)
2 Tobacco use (max 1.5:1 ratio)
3 location (where you live)
4 number of people on your policy

As someone who has come down recently with a rather nasty case of Kidney Stones, I was alarmed to see that this could make me, under the old rules, uninsurable. After 1/1/2014, I should be able to purchase insurance in the individual market without price discrimination for the prior kidney stones episode.

After I realized this I now feel much relief.

-gauss
gauss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 07:46 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Accidental Retiree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,499
DH and I got the same letters today. We read a couple of weeks ago that Aetna was not going to be part of the Covered California exchange. We will just go the exchange and deal with it. That's all. The premiums are not too different.

We have pumped a lot of premium $$$$ into Aetna for the past few years, with little use of the policies, but that is what insurance is about, right? I'd rather NOT have had to use them than not have paid and then have had need of insurance.

DH has a pre-existing condition, so at least we're covered there, in 2014.
__________________
Chief Retirement Strategist
The AR Group
Accidental Retiree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 08:21 AM   #6
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 944
Thanks for the replies and links. I guess I should not be concerned as long as this program rolls out as expected! Almost seems to good to be true . This may be a better situation all around - will be interesting to see if the cost will have the same yearly jump as it has since 06 or be more stable.

Yes AccRet insurance is just that - pumping money in for years will get you nothing unless you have a claim (and piece of mind). I still hate to see them get off so easy

Good info gaus, thanks - sorry to hear of your stones.

I read the links carefully thanks MB and Omni!
__________________
Freed at 49. You only live once - live it
Donzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 08:39 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,796
Donzo-
You should be fine in CA with their Exchange in place with solid info on your '14 HI options. With only ~3mo left before scheduled open enrollment under ACA, in most states their Exchanges (whether Federal or fed/state partnerships) remain unfinalized with no exact details of insurers participating, plan features (beyond basic 'metal' descriptions), premiums, etc.
ERhoosier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 08:43 AM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Marco island
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by gauss
Donzo,

Getting dumped by your health care provider will have very different consequences than in the past.

Under PPACA (aka Obamacare) if you are in the individual market, starting in 2014
- insurer's will not be allowed to deny you coverage
- rates will not be allowed to vary based on your medical conditions

- rates will only be allowed to vary based on:
1 Age (max 3:1 ratio)
2 Tobacco use (max 1.5:1 ratio)
3 location (where you live)
4 number of people on your policy

As someone who has come down recently with a rather nasty case of Kidney Stones, I was alarmed to see that this could make me, under the old rules, uninsurable. After 1/1/2014, I should be able to purchase insurance in the individual market without price discrimination for the prior kidney stones episode.

After I realized this I now feel much relief.

-gauss
Maybe the insurance companies are dumping those with chronic Illnesses now so they aren't locked into them after 2014. Without underwriting, premiums would have to be increased for everyone making it difficult to compete with the exchanges. Eventually, insurance costs should be identical whether inside or outside the exchanges. The only difference will be who offers the greatest subsidy. Your boss or Uncle Sam.
Gatordoc50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 08:47 AM   #9
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Never miss an opportunity to get in a dig.

Actually, the California exchange and FFE's may be at the same stage of development and policy offering for all we know. The Cal policies are still under negotiation, as are the FFE offerings, but one has chosen to share more details with the general public. More details shared does not mean more progress.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatordoc50 View Post
Maybe the insurance companies are dumping those with chronic Illnesses now so they aren't locked into them after 2014. Without underwriting, premiums would have to be increased for everyone making it difficult to compete with the exchanges. Eventually, insurance costs should be identical whether inside or outside the exchanges. The only difference will be who offers the greatest subsidy. Your boss or Uncle Sam.
Can't do that. Insurers can withdraw policy offerings from entire groups but not dump specific individuals because of medical condition.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 08:56 AM   #10
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Marco island
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Never miss an opportunity to get in a dig.

Actually, the California exchange and FFE's may be at the same stage of development and policy offering for all we know. The Cal policies are still under negotiation, as are the FFE offerings, but one has chosen to share more details with the general public. More details shared does not mean more progress.

Can't do that. Insurers can withdraw policy offerings from entire groups but not dump specific individuals because of medical condition.
Oh, I thought that individuals were being let go on this forum. The whole group is being dumped. That does make more sense. Still wonder why they are getting out, though.
Gatordoc50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 09:16 AM   #11
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
From the LA Times Aetna to exit a key market in California - Los Angeles Times

Quote:
Facing tougher price competition from a state-run marketplace, Aetna Inc. said it would exit California's individual health insurance market by year-end and leave nearly 50,000 customers searching for new coverage.

Aetna, the nation's third-largest health insurer, will maintain a major presence in California with a focus on large and small employers. But the move reflects how the federal healthcare law and its rollout in different states is rapidly reshaping the health insurance landscape for millions of consumers.

./.

"National companies that don't have a strong local presence may not be able to compete on price very well if they don't have the best networks or best discounts," said Gary Claxton, a vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan research group. "Aetna has places where it is stronger."
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 09:37 AM   #12
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Marco island
Posts: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Thanks for the link.
Gatordoc50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 09:58 AM   #13
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Marco island
Posts: 815
After doing some reading on large employer obligations, it seems that they will incur fines if employees opt for the exchange and get subsidized. In essence, large employees will have to offer insurance at lower cost to the employee than the exchanges, subsidies included. Is that correct?
Gatordoc50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 10:18 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatordoc50 View Post
After doing some reading on large employer obligations, it seems that they will incur fines if employees opt for the exchange and get subsidized. In essence, large employees will have to offer insurance at lower cost to the employee than the exchanges, subsidies included. Is that correct?
That is true, but larger companies that don't currently heavily subsidize their insurance coverage may choose not to do so in the future under the ACA. The penalties are $3000 per employee that chooses to use the exchange and get a subsidy. So a large corporation may contemplate the law and decide to efficiently breach the requirement to insure all employees. After all, it may cost them $10000-15000 per employee to offer reasonably affordable (compared to the exchanges) insurance to those employees with families. Some companies may view $3000 as quite Affordable and inform their employees that the exchanges exist and subsidies are available. I imagine most large companies are doing the math (or already have done the math) and will decide what course of action to take in their upcoming benefits offerings.
__________________
Retired in 2013 at age 33. Keeping busy reading, blogging, relaxing, gaming, and enjoying the outdoors with my wife and 3 kids (8, 13, and 15).
FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 11:24 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
Must have been interrupted when I was typing as my post did not get posted...


I find in interesting that people think that past insurance payments means a locked in policy for life... why

I have lost insurance a number of times... twice due to companies deciding to get out of a market... they moved on.... I moved on.... it is a business decision....

So, you contract for a year for insurance... at the end of the year you can decide to go with another company.... they can also... (now, there are laws etc that would not allow this for various reasons... but normally)...

it is not like they are kicking you out because they have to pay big bills... so why do past premiums come into play
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 12:08 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post

Actually, the California exchange and FFE's may be at the same stage of development and policy offering for all we know. The Cal policies are still under negotiation, as are the FFE offerings, but one has chosen to share more details with the general public. More details shared does not mean more progress.
Not sure I agree. CA, and a few other states, have published which firms have been accepted to offer HI thru Exchange along with (at least prelim) rates. For some of us, we do not even know which companies will participate in Exchange- let alone any rate info. To me this all suggests CA is MUCH closer to an operational Exchange. Being close to FIRE with no pension nor retiree HI, this is more than an academic difference to me.

Re- employer subsidies: This has traditionally been part of benefit package to attract the best talent. Unfortunately many employers have been cutting their HI subsidy over past few yrs so folks are paying a higher proportion of the total premium. For some who are now paying 50+% of their premiums, HI becomes less of a reason to stick around
ERhoosier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 04:18 PM   #17
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gauss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud View Post
I find in interesting that people think that past insurance payments means a locked in policy for life... why
Maybe they have been sold universal/whole life policies in the past (as opposed to term life insurance which would be a better analogy) where the model was to pay more in the early years for the right to pay less in the later years.

-gauss
gauss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 10:16 AM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,183
Aetna dropping out of the California individual health market is very interesting. I was an Aetna individual health insurance customer from the time I FIREd in 2007 until October, 2012.

From my personal experience, they offered teaser rates and then their rates inflated rapidly for existing subscribers. Maybe this was a bid to get into the market with a significant market share. I am in my 40s, and my personal experience was an annual premium increase rate of about 22% per annum over that 5.4 year time frame.

Anyway, this makes me glad that I got out last year as I live overseas and the only real reason for me to stay was because my grandfathered plan might be better than other options. But that turned out not to be the case, I would have been dropped anyway. I have always believed that the PPACA will lead to a quick end to most grandfathered plans and that was one of my incentives for leaving the system. I no longer maintain USA health insurance and just buy temporary USA insurance for my USA visits.
kramer is offline   Reply With Quote
Covered California rates not that good at all...
Old 07-08-2013, 06:01 PM   #19
Confused about dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Indio
Posts: 1
Covered California rates not that good at all...

I also am an early retiree and recently received the same letter from Aetna. But for my situation, the Covered California exchange is not offering me any bargains. I am just over the limit to qualify for federal subsidies, so my insurance premium under Covered California will increase nearly $325 a month! And I have no preconditions, and take no medicines whatsoever! So much for Obama's promise that "... The insurance policy you have today, you will still have tomorrow". The politicians obviously live in a different world.
tld999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 06:17 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by tld999 View Post
I also am an early retiree and recently received the same letter from Aetna. But for my situation, the Covered California exchange is not offering me any bargains. I am just over the limit to qualify for federal subsidies, so my insurance premium under Covered California will increase nearly $325 a month! And I have no preconditions, and take no medicines whatsoever! So much for Obama's promise that "... The insurance policy you have today, you will still have tomorrow". The politicians obviously live in a different world.
Welcome to the "War on the Bros", as I am a proud member also. Google the term if you are curious. Take some solace in the fact that when we start to push 60, the 3-1 premium ratio over young people will eventually work back in our favor and mitigate some of the losses before Medicare. Provided of course that doesn't change!
Mulligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.