Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Health insurance, a misnomer.
Old 08-22-2013, 10:16 AM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ls99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,499
Health insurance, a misnomer.

In the Wall Street Journal today is an article about getting surgery outside of the bounds of third parties, ie. insurers.


The upshot of the article is that what we call insurance is really an arrangement for providers to get a pre negotiated price for services rendered. Seems, if one has some elective medical work to be done and negotiates with the providers up front, a much lower cost is possible.

The author a doc says all the providers got proper compensation.

This obviously won't work in an emergency situation.

Jeffrey Singer: The Man Who Was Treated for $17,000 Less - WSJ.com

Edit add: By the way there are a lot of gems, previously unknow to me in the article. Ex. If using any form insurance or medicare, the doctor is prohibited by contract to offer a cash price service to that patient. Hmmmm.

The real kicker is at the end, in re: obamacare.
__________________
There must be moderation in everything, including moderation.
ls99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-22-2013, 10:32 AM   #2
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 17,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by ls99 View Post
In the Wall Street Journal today is an article about getting surgery outside of the bounds of third parties, ie. insurers.

The upshot of the article is that what we call insurance is really an arrangement for providers to get a pre negotiated price for services rendered. Seems, if one has some elective medical work to be done and negotiates with the providers up front, a much lower cost is possible.

The author a doc says all the providers got proper compensation.

This obviously won't work in an emergency situation.

Jeffrey Singer: The Man Who Was Treated for $17,000 Less - WSJ.com

Edit add: By the way there are a lot of gems, previously unknow to me in the article. Ex. If using any form insurance or medicare, the doctor is prohibited by contract to offer a cash price service to that patient. Hmmmm.

The real kicker is at the end, in re: obamacare.
The real kicker to me is that the total cost of the procedure was only $3000 (a cost the providers themselves came up with, as the patient could have paid more and was not negotiating). So why was $20,000 supposedly the cost with the insurance?
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 10:49 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ls99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestwifeever View Post
The real kicker to me is that the total cost of the procedure was only $3000 (a cost the providers themselves came up with, as the patient could have paid more and was not negotiating). So why was $20,000 supposedly the cost with the insurance?

The article says that hospitals and docs via AMA quote astronomical reatail prices to the insurers and full fare Freddies aka uninsured and self insured.

Don't know why that is. Someone in the medical underwriting business may be able to shed light on that little detail. Ahem, the may be prohibited from disclosing the details to the great unwashed.
__________________
There must be moderation in everything, including moderation.
ls99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 11:27 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
I've always wondered why the managed care organizations never productized the concept of "membership without insurance". It would have allowed savvy folks who chose not to purchase insurance to at least obtain the same pricing on a self-pay basis.

All irrelevant in the brave new world of ACA.
FinanceGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 03:17 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by ls99 View Post
The article says that hospitals and docs via AMA quote astronomical reatail prices to the insurers and full fare Freddies aka uninsured and self insured.

Don't know why that is. Someone in the medical underwriting business may be able to shed light on that little detail. Ahem, the may be prohibited from disclosing the details to the great unwashed.
Actually less than 20% of US docs are AMA members. Although AMA does lobby Congress, it has nothing to do with specific pricing/payment negotiations between individual HI co's & providers (doc's, hospitals, drug/equipment makers, etc).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americ...al_Association

The utterly silly current situation of uninsured folks being charged WAY more than insured has (IMHO) evolved from decades of HI co's demanding increasingly big % "discounts" from "retail", and providers raising their "retail" prices to match. Providers have claimed they cannot offer same discounts to uninsured due to potential contractual or "fraud" issues
Hospitals Charge Uninsured More - CBS News
Agree 100% that this has gotten far out of hand and needs to be fixed.
ERhoosier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 04:35 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,894
AMA is very much involved in setting the medicare fee schedules which most other insurance rates are based.

AMA’s Role in Setting Medicare Fees Battered

AMA has also been working for decades to limit the supply of DRs and are against using Nurse practitioners

USATODAY.com - Medical miscalculation creates doctor shortage
rbmrtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.